Cargando…
Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making
Perceptual decision making is an active process where animals move their sense organs to extract task-relevant information. To investigate how the brain translates sensory input into decisions during active sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be preci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2217-18.2019 |
_version_ | 1783418752571801600 |
---|---|
author | Campagner, Dario Evans, Mathew H. Chlebikova, Katarina Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea Loft, Michaela S.E. Fox, Sarah Pettifer, David Humphries, Mark D. Svoboda, Karel Petersen, Rasmus S. |
author_facet | Campagner, Dario Evans, Mathew H. Chlebikova, Katarina Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea Loft, Michaela S.E. Fox, Sarah Pettifer, David Humphries, Mark D. Svoboda, Karel Petersen, Rasmus S. |
author_sort | Campagner, Dario |
collection | PubMed |
description | Perceptual decision making is an active process where animals move their sense organs to extract task-relevant information. To investigate how the brain translates sensory input into decisions during active sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be precisely measured and that challenges animals to use multiple mechanosensory cues. Male mice were trained to localize a pole using a single whisker and to report their decision by selecting one of three choices. Using high-speed imaging and machine vision, we estimated whisker–object mechanical forces at millisecond resolution. Mice solved the task by a sensory-motor strategy where both the strength and direction of whisker bending were informative cues to pole location. We found competing influences of immediate sensory input and choice memory on mouse choice. On correct trials, choice could be predicted from the direction and strength of whisker bending, but not from previous choice. In contrast, on error trials, choice could be predicted from previous choice but not from whisker bending. This study shows that animal choices during active tactile decision making can be predicted from mechanosensory and choice-memory signals, and provides a new task well suited for the future study of the neural basis of active perceptual decisions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Due to the difficulty of measuring the sensory input to moving sense organs, active perceptual decision making remains poorly understood. The whisker system provides a way forward since it is now possible to measure the mechanical forces due to whisker–object contact during behavior. Here we train mice in a novel behavioral task that challenges them to use rich mechanosensory cues but can be performed using one whisker and enables task-relevant mechanical forces to be precisely estimated. This approach enables rigorous study of how sensory cues translate into action during active, perceptual decision making. Our findings provide new insight into active touch and how sensory/internal signals interact to determine behavioral choices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6520515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65205152019-05-17 Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making Campagner, Dario Evans, Mathew H. Chlebikova, Katarina Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea Loft, Michaela S.E. Fox, Sarah Pettifer, David Humphries, Mark D. Svoboda, Karel Petersen, Rasmus S. J Neurosci Research Articles Perceptual decision making is an active process where animals move their sense organs to extract task-relevant information. To investigate how the brain translates sensory input into decisions during active sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be precisely measured and that challenges animals to use multiple mechanosensory cues. Male mice were trained to localize a pole using a single whisker and to report their decision by selecting one of three choices. Using high-speed imaging and machine vision, we estimated whisker–object mechanical forces at millisecond resolution. Mice solved the task by a sensory-motor strategy where both the strength and direction of whisker bending were informative cues to pole location. We found competing influences of immediate sensory input and choice memory on mouse choice. On correct trials, choice could be predicted from the direction and strength of whisker bending, but not from previous choice. In contrast, on error trials, choice could be predicted from previous choice but not from whisker bending. This study shows that animal choices during active tactile decision making can be predicted from mechanosensory and choice-memory signals, and provides a new task well suited for the future study of the neural basis of active perceptual decisions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Due to the difficulty of measuring the sensory input to moving sense organs, active perceptual decision making remains poorly understood. The whisker system provides a way forward since it is now possible to measure the mechanical forces due to whisker–object contact during behavior. Here we train mice in a novel behavioral task that challenges them to use rich mechanosensory cues but can be performed using one whisker and enables task-relevant mechanical forces to be precisely estimated. This approach enables rigorous study of how sensory cues translate into action during active, perceptual decision making. Our findings provide new insight into active touch and how sensory/internal signals interact to determine behavioral choices. Society for Neuroscience 2019-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6520515/ /pubmed/30850514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2217-18.2019 Text en Copyright © 2019 Campagner, Evans et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Campagner, Dario Evans, Mathew H. Chlebikova, Katarina Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea Loft, Michaela S.E. Fox, Sarah Pettifer, David Humphries, Mark D. Svoboda, Karel Petersen, Rasmus S. Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making |
title | Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making |
title_full | Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making |
title_fullStr | Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making |
title_short | Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making |
title_sort | prediction of choice from competing mechanosensory and choice-memory cues during active tactile decision making |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2217-18.2019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campagnerdario predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT evansmathewh predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT chlebikovakatarina predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT colinsrodriguezandrea predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT loftmichaelase predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT foxsarah predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT pettiferdavid predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT humphriesmarkd predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT svobodakarel predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking AT petersenrasmuss predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking |