Cargando…

Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making

Perceptual decision making is an active process where animals move their sense organs to extract task-relevant information. To investigate how the brain translates sensory input into decisions during active sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be preci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campagner, Dario, Evans, Mathew H., Chlebikova, Katarina, Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea, Loft, Michaela S.E., Fox, Sarah, Pettifer, David, Humphries, Mark D., Svoboda, Karel, Petersen, Rasmus S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2217-18.2019
_version_ 1783418752571801600
author Campagner, Dario
Evans, Mathew H.
Chlebikova, Katarina
Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea
Loft, Michaela S.E.
Fox, Sarah
Pettifer, David
Humphries, Mark D.
Svoboda, Karel
Petersen, Rasmus S.
author_facet Campagner, Dario
Evans, Mathew H.
Chlebikova, Katarina
Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea
Loft, Michaela S.E.
Fox, Sarah
Pettifer, David
Humphries, Mark D.
Svoboda, Karel
Petersen, Rasmus S.
author_sort Campagner, Dario
collection PubMed
description Perceptual decision making is an active process where animals move their sense organs to extract task-relevant information. To investigate how the brain translates sensory input into decisions during active sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be precisely measured and that challenges animals to use multiple mechanosensory cues. Male mice were trained to localize a pole using a single whisker and to report their decision by selecting one of three choices. Using high-speed imaging and machine vision, we estimated whisker–object mechanical forces at millisecond resolution. Mice solved the task by a sensory-motor strategy where both the strength and direction of whisker bending were informative cues to pole location. We found competing influences of immediate sensory input and choice memory on mouse choice. On correct trials, choice could be predicted from the direction and strength of whisker bending, but not from previous choice. In contrast, on error trials, choice could be predicted from previous choice but not from whisker bending. This study shows that animal choices during active tactile decision making can be predicted from mechanosensory and choice-memory signals, and provides a new task well suited for the future study of the neural basis of active perceptual decisions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Due to the difficulty of measuring the sensory input to moving sense organs, active perceptual decision making remains poorly understood. The whisker system provides a way forward since it is now possible to measure the mechanical forces due to whisker–object contact during behavior. Here we train mice in a novel behavioral task that challenges them to use rich mechanosensory cues but can be performed using one whisker and enables task-relevant mechanical forces to be precisely estimated. This approach enables rigorous study of how sensory cues translate into action during active, perceptual decision making. Our findings provide new insight into active touch and how sensory/internal signals interact to determine behavioral choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6520515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65205152019-05-17 Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making Campagner, Dario Evans, Mathew H. Chlebikova, Katarina Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea Loft, Michaela S.E. Fox, Sarah Pettifer, David Humphries, Mark D. Svoboda, Karel Petersen, Rasmus S. J Neurosci Research Articles Perceptual decision making is an active process where animals move their sense organs to extract task-relevant information. To investigate how the brain translates sensory input into decisions during active sensation, we developed a mouse active touch task where the mechanosensory input can be precisely measured and that challenges animals to use multiple mechanosensory cues. Male mice were trained to localize a pole using a single whisker and to report their decision by selecting one of three choices. Using high-speed imaging and machine vision, we estimated whisker–object mechanical forces at millisecond resolution. Mice solved the task by a sensory-motor strategy where both the strength and direction of whisker bending were informative cues to pole location. We found competing influences of immediate sensory input and choice memory on mouse choice. On correct trials, choice could be predicted from the direction and strength of whisker bending, but not from previous choice. In contrast, on error trials, choice could be predicted from previous choice but not from whisker bending. This study shows that animal choices during active tactile decision making can be predicted from mechanosensory and choice-memory signals, and provides a new task well suited for the future study of the neural basis of active perceptual decisions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Due to the difficulty of measuring the sensory input to moving sense organs, active perceptual decision making remains poorly understood. The whisker system provides a way forward since it is now possible to measure the mechanical forces due to whisker–object contact during behavior. Here we train mice in a novel behavioral task that challenges them to use rich mechanosensory cues but can be performed using one whisker and enables task-relevant mechanical forces to be precisely estimated. This approach enables rigorous study of how sensory cues translate into action during active, perceptual decision making. Our findings provide new insight into active touch and how sensory/internal signals interact to determine behavioral choices. Society for Neuroscience 2019-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6520515/ /pubmed/30850514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2217-18.2019 Text en Copyright © 2019 Campagner, Evans et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Campagner, Dario
Evans, Mathew H.
Chlebikova, Katarina
Colins-Rodriguez, Andrea
Loft, Michaela S.E.
Fox, Sarah
Pettifer, David
Humphries, Mark D.
Svoboda, Karel
Petersen, Rasmus S.
Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making
title Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making
title_full Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making
title_fullStr Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making
title_short Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making
title_sort prediction of choice from competing mechanosensory and choice-memory cues during active tactile decision making
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2217-18.2019
work_keys_str_mv AT campagnerdario predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT evansmathewh predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT chlebikovakatarina predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT colinsrodriguezandrea predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT loftmichaelase predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT foxsarah predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT pettiferdavid predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT humphriesmarkd predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT svobodakarel predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking
AT petersenrasmuss predictionofchoicefromcompetingmechanosensoryandchoicememorycuesduringactivetactiledecisionmaking