Cargando…

Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data

Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) experiments can generate 1000s of concentration-response profiles to screen compounds for potentially adverse effects. However, potency estimates for a single compound can vary considerably in study designs incorporating multiple concentration-response p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shockley, Keith R., Gupta, Shuva, Harris, Shawn F., Lahiri, Soumendra N., Peddada, Shyamal D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00387
_version_ 1783418761747890176
author Shockley, Keith R.
Gupta, Shuva
Harris, Shawn F.
Lahiri, Soumendra N.
Peddada, Shyamal D.
author_facet Shockley, Keith R.
Gupta, Shuva
Harris, Shawn F.
Lahiri, Soumendra N.
Peddada, Shyamal D.
author_sort Shockley, Keith R.
collection PubMed
description Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) experiments can generate 1000s of concentration-response profiles to screen compounds for potentially adverse effects. However, potency estimates for a single compound can vary considerably in study designs incorporating multiple concentration-response profiles for each compound. We introduce an automated quality control procedure based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify and filter out compounds with multiple cluster response patterns and improve potency estimation in qHTS assays. Our approach, called Cluster Analysis by Subgroups using ANOVA (CASANOVA), clusters compound-specific response patterns into statistically supported subgroups. Applying CASANOVA to 43 publicly available qHTS data sets, we found that only about 20% of compounds with response values outside of the noise band have single cluster responses. The error rates for incorrectly separating true clusters and incorrectly clumping disparate clusters were both less than 5% in extensive simulation studies. Simulation studies also showed that the bias and variance of concentration at half-maximal response (AC(50)) estimates were usually within 10-fold when using a weighted average approach for potency estimation. In short, CASANOVA effectively sorts out compounds with “inconsistent” response patterns and produces trustworthy AC(50) values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6520559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65205592019-05-29 Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data Shockley, Keith R. Gupta, Shuva Harris, Shawn F. Lahiri, Soumendra N. Peddada, Shyamal D. Front Genet Genetics Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) experiments can generate 1000s of concentration-response profiles to screen compounds for potentially adverse effects. However, potency estimates for a single compound can vary considerably in study designs incorporating multiple concentration-response profiles for each compound. We introduce an automated quality control procedure based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify and filter out compounds with multiple cluster response patterns and improve potency estimation in qHTS assays. Our approach, called Cluster Analysis by Subgroups using ANOVA (CASANOVA), clusters compound-specific response patterns into statistically supported subgroups. Applying CASANOVA to 43 publicly available qHTS data sets, we found that only about 20% of compounds with response values outside of the noise band have single cluster responses. The error rates for incorrectly separating true clusters and incorrectly clumping disparate clusters were both less than 5% in extensive simulation studies. Simulation studies also showed that the bias and variance of concentration at half-maximal response (AC(50)) estimates were usually within 10-fold when using a weighted average approach for potency estimation. In short, CASANOVA effectively sorts out compounds with “inconsistent” response patterns and produces trustworthy AC(50) values. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6520559/ /pubmed/31143201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00387 Text en Copyright © 2019 Shockley, Gupta, Harris, Lahiri and Peddada. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Shockley, Keith R.
Gupta, Shuva
Harris, Shawn F.
Lahiri, Soumendra N.
Peddada, Shyamal D.
Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
title Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
title_full Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
title_fullStr Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
title_full_unstemmed Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
title_short Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
title_sort quality control of quantitative high throughput screening data
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00387
work_keys_str_mv AT shockleykeithr qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata
AT guptashuva qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata
AT harrisshawnf qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata
AT lahirisoumendran qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata
AT peddadashyamald qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata