Cargando…
Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) experiments can generate 1000s of concentration-response profiles to screen compounds for potentially adverse effects. However, potency estimates for a single compound can vary considerably in study designs incorporating multiple concentration-response p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00387 |
_version_ | 1783418761747890176 |
---|---|
author | Shockley, Keith R. Gupta, Shuva Harris, Shawn F. Lahiri, Soumendra N. Peddada, Shyamal D. |
author_facet | Shockley, Keith R. Gupta, Shuva Harris, Shawn F. Lahiri, Soumendra N. Peddada, Shyamal D. |
author_sort | Shockley, Keith R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) experiments can generate 1000s of concentration-response profiles to screen compounds for potentially adverse effects. However, potency estimates for a single compound can vary considerably in study designs incorporating multiple concentration-response profiles for each compound. We introduce an automated quality control procedure based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify and filter out compounds with multiple cluster response patterns and improve potency estimation in qHTS assays. Our approach, called Cluster Analysis by Subgroups using ANOVA (CASANOVA), clusters compound-specific response patterns into statistically supported subgroups. Applying CASANOVA to 43 publicly available qHTS data sets, we found that only about 20% of compounds with response values outside of the noise band have single cluster responses. The error rates for incorrectly separating true clusters and incorrectly clumping disparate clusters were both less than 5% in extensive simulation studies. Simulation studies also showed that the bias and variance of concentration at half-maximal response (AC(50)) estimates were usually within 10-fold when using a weighted average approach for potency estimation. In short, CASANOVA effectively sorts out compounds with “inconsistent” response patterns and produces trustworthy AC(50) values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6520559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65205592019-05-29 Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data Shockley, Keith R. Gupta, Shuva Harris, Shawn F. Lahiri, Soumendra N. Peddada, Shyamal D. Front Genet Genetics Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) experiments can generate 1000s of concentration-response profiles to screen compounds for potentially adverse effects. However, potency estimates for a single compound can vary considerably in study designs incorporating multiple concentration-response profiles for each compound. We introduce an automated quality control procedure based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify and filter out compounds with multiple cluster response patterns and improve potency estimation in qHTS assays. Our approach, called Cluster Analysis by Subgroups using ANOVA (CASANOVA), clusters compound-specific response patterns into statistically supported subgroups. Applying CASANOVA to 43 publicly available qHTS data sets, we found that only about 20% of compounds with response values outside of the noise band have single cluster responses. The error rates for incorrectly separating true clusters and incorrectly clumping disparate clusters were both less than 5% in extensive simulation studies. Simulation studies also showed that the bias and variance of concentration at half-maximal response (AC(50)) estimates were usually within 10-fold when using a weighted average approach for potency estimation. In short, CASANOVA effectively sorts out compounds with “inconsistent” response patterns and produces trustworthy AC(50) values. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6520559/ /pubmed/31143201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00387 Text en Copyright © 2019 Shockley, Gupta, Harris, Lahiri and Peddada. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Shockley, Keith R. Gupta, Shuva Harris, Shawn F. Lahiri, Soumendra N. Peddada, Shyamal D. Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data |
title | Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data |
title_full | Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data |
title_fullStr | Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data |
title_short | Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data |
title_sort | quality control of quantitative high throughput screening data |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00387 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shockleykeithr qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata AT guptashuva qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata AT harrisshawnf qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata AT lahirisoumendran qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata AT peddadashyamald qualitycontrolofquantitativehighthroughputscreeningdata |