Cargando…

The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials

The material-weight illusion (MWI) occurs when an object that looks heavy (e.g., stone) and one that looks light (e.g., Styrofoam) have the same mass. When such stimuli are lifted, the heavier-looking object feels lighter than the lighter-looking object, presumably because well-learned priors about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulun, Vivian C., Buckingham, Gavin, Goodale, Melvyn A., Fleming, Roland W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00199.2018
_version_ 1783418774978822144
author Paulun, Vivian C.
Buckingham, Gavin
Goodale, Melvyn A.
Fleming, Roland W.
author_facet Paulun, Vivian C.
Buckingham, Gavin
Goodale, Melvyn A.
Fleming, Roland W.
author_sort Paulun, Vivian C.
collection PubMed
description The material-weight illusion (MWI) occurs when an object that looks heavy (e.g., stone) and one that looks light (e.g., Styrofoam) have the same mass. When such stimuli are lifted, the heavier-looking object feels lighter than the lighter-looking object, presumably because well-learned priors about the density of different materials are violated. We examined whether a similar illusion occurs when a certain weight distribution is expected (such as the metal end of a hammer being heavier), but weight is uniformly distributed. In experiment 1, participants lifted bipartite objects that appeared to be made of two materials (combinations of stone, Styrofoam, and wood) but were manipulated to have a uniform weight distribution. Most participants experienced an inverted MWI (i.e., the heavier-looking side felt heavier), suggesting an integration of incoming sensory information with density priors. However, a replication of the classic MWI was found when the objects appeared to be uniformly made of just one of the materials (experiment 2). Both illusions seemed to be independent of the forces used when the objects were lifted. When lifting bipartite objects but asked to judge the weight of the whole object, participants experienced no illusion (experiment 3). In experiment 4, we investigated weight perception in objects with a nonuniform weight distribution and again found evidence for an integration of prior and sensory information. Taken together, our seemingly contradictory results challenge most theories about the MWI. However, Bayesian integration of competing density priors with the likelihood of incoming sensory information may explain the opposing illusions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We report a novel weight illusion that contradicts all current explanations of the material-weight illusion: When lifting an object composed of two materials, the heavier-looking side feels heavier, even when the true weight distribution is uniform. The opposite (classic) illusion is found when the same materials are lifted in two separate objects. Identifying the common mechanism underlying both illusions will have implications for perception more generally. A potential candidate is Bayesian inference with competing priors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6520622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65206222020-03-01 The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials Paulun, Vivian C. Buckingham, Gavin Goodale, Melvyn A. Fleming, Roland W. J Neurophysiol Research Article The material-weight illusion (MWI) occurs when an object that looks heavy (e.g., stone) and one that looks light (e.g., Styrofoam) have the same mass. When such stimuli are lifted, the heavier-looking object feels lighter than the lighter-looking object, presumably because well-learned priors about the density of different materials are violated. We examined whether a similar illusion occurs when a certain weight distribution is expected (such as the metal end of a hammer being heavier), but weight is uniformly distributed. In experiment 1, participants lifted bipartite objects that appeared to be made of two materials (combinations of stone, Styrofoam, and wood) but were manipulated to have a uniform weight distribution. Most participants experienced an inverted MWI (i.e., the heavier-looking side felt heavier), suggesting an integration of incoming sensory information with density priors. However, a replication of the classic MWI was found when the objects appeared to be uniformly made of just one of the materials (experiment 2). Both illusions seemed to be independent of the forces used when the objects were lifted. When lifting bipartite objects but asked to judge the weight of the whole object, participants experienced no illusion (experiment 3). In experiment 4, we investigated weight perception in objects with a nonuniform weight distribution and again found evidence for an integration of prior and sensory information. Taken together, our seemingly contradictory results challenge most theories about the MWI. However, Bayesian integration of competing density priors with the likelihood of incoming sensory information may explain the opposing illusions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We report a novel weight illusion that contradicts all current explanations of the material-weight illusion: When lifting an object composed of two materials, the heavier-looking side feels heavier, even when the true weight distribution is uniform. The opposite (classic) illusion is found when the same materials are lifted in two separate objects. Identifying the common mechanism underlying both illusions will have implications for perception more generally. A potential candidate is Bayesian inference with competing priors. American Physiological Society 2019-03-01 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6520622/ /pubmed/30673359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00199.2018 Text en Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US) : © the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paulun, Vivian C.
Buckingham, Gavin
Goodale, Melvyn A.
Fleming, Roland W.
The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
title The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
title_full The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
title_fullStr The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
title_full_unstemmed The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
title_short The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
title_sort material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00199.2018
work_keys_str_mv AT paulunvivianc thematerialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials
AT buckinghamgavin thematerialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials
AT goodalemelvyna thematerialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials
AT flemingrolandw thematerialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials
AT paulunvivianc materialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials
AT buckinghamgavin materialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials
AT goodalemelvyna materialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials
AT flemingrolandw materialweightillusiondisappearsorinvertsinobjectsmadeoftwomaterials