Cargando…
A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults
The measurement of food literacy has recently gained momentum globally. The aim of this paper is to review the literature in order to describe and analyse the measurement of adult food literacy. The objectives are to i) identify tools that explicitly measure food literacy in adults; ii) summarise th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30965628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040801 |
_version_ | 1783418812847095808 |
---|---|
author | Amouzandeh, Claudia Fingland, Donna Vidgen, Helen Anna |
author_facet | Amouzandeh, Claudia Fingland, Donna Vidgen, Helen Anna |
author_sort | Amouzandeh, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The measurement of food literacy has recently gained momentum globally. The aim of this paper is to review the literature in order to describe and analyse the measurement of adult food literacy. The objectives are to i) identify tools that explicitly measure food literacy in adults; ii) summarise their psychometric properties; and iii) critique tool items against the four domains and 11 components of food literacy, as conceptualised by Vidgen and Gallegos. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a search of seven databases (PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, EBSCOhost, A+ Education, and ProQuest) was undertaken. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Papers reported on either the development of a tool to explicitly measure food literacy or a part thereof (n = 5); food literacy strategy indicators (n = 1); tools developed to evaluate a food literacy intervention (n = 3); or tools to measure food literacy as a characteristic within a broader study (n = 3). Six tools captured all four domains. None measured all components. Items measuring the same component varied considerably. Most tools referenced a theoretical framework, were validated and reliable. This review will assist practitioners select and develop tools for the measurement of food literacy in their context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6520792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65207922019-05-31 A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults Amouzandeh, Claudia Fingland, Donna Vidgen, Helen Anna Nutrients Review The measurement of food literacy has recently gained momentum globally. The aim of this paper is to review the literature in order to describe and analyse the measurement of adult food literacy. The objectives are to i) identify tools that explicitly measure food literacy in adults; ii) summarise their psychometric properties; and iii) critique tool items against the four domains and 11 components of food literacy, as conceptualised by Vidgen and Gallegos. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a search of seven databases (PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, EBSCOhost, A+ Education, and ProQuest) was undertaken. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Papers reported on either the development of a tool to explicitly measure food literacy or a part thereof (n = 5); food literacy strategy indicators (n = 1); tools developed to evaluate a food literacy intervention (n = 3); or tools to measure food literacy as a characteristic within a broader study (n = 3). Six tools captured all four domains. None measured all components. Items measuring the same component varied considerably. Most tools referenced a theoretical framework, were validated and reliable. This review will assist practitioners select and develop tools for the measurement of food literacy in their context. MDPI 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6520792/ /pubmed/30965628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040801 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Amouzandeh, Claudia Fingland, Donna Vidgen, Helen Anna A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults |
title | A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults |
title_full | A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults |
title_fullStr | A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults |
title_short | A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults |
title_sort | scoping review of the validity, reliability and conceptual alignment of food literacy measures for adults |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30965628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amouzandehclaudia ascopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults AT finglanddonna ascopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults AT vidgenhelenanna ascopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults AT amouzandehclaudia scopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults AT finglanddonna scopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults AT vidgenhelenanna scopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults |