Cargando…

A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults

The measurement of food literacy has recently gained momentum globally. The aim of this paper is to review the literature in order to describe and analyse the measurement of adult food literacy. The objectives are to i) identify tools that explicitly measure food literacy in adults; ii) summarise th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amouzandeh, Claudia, Fingland, Donna, Vidgen, Helen Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30965628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040801
_version_ 1783418812847095808
author Amouzandeh, Claudia
Fingland, Donna
Vidgen, Helen Anna
author_facet Amouzandeh, Claudia
Fingland, Donna
Vidgen, Helen Anna
author_sort Amouzandeh, Claudia
collection PubMed
description The measurement of food literacy has recently gained momentum globally. The aim of this paper is to review the literature in order to describe and analyse the measurement of adult food literacy. The objectives are to i) identify tools that explicitly measure food literacy in adults; ii) summarise their psychometric properties; and iii) critique tool items against the four domains and 11 components of food literacy, as conceptualised by Vidgen and Gallegos. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a search of seven databases (PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, EBSCOhost, A+ Education, and ProQuest) was undertaken. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Papers reported on either the development of a tool to explicitly measure food literacy or a part thereof (n = 5); food literacy strategy indicators (n = 1); tools developed to evaluate a food literacy intervention (n = 3); or tools to measure food literacy as a characteristic within a broader study (n = 3). Six tools captured all four domains. None measured all components. Items measuring the same component varied considerably. Most tools referenced a theoretical framework, were validated and reliable. This review will assist practitioners select and develop tools for the measurement of food literacy in their context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6520792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65207922019-05-31 A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults Amouzandeh, Claudia Fingland, Donna Vidgen, Helen Anna Nutrients Review The measurement of food literacy has recently gained momentum globally. The aim of this paper is to review the literature in order to describe and analyse the measurement of adult food literacy. The objectives are to i) identify tools that explicitly measure food literacy in adults; ii) summarise their psychometric properties; and iii) critique tool items against the four domains and 11 components of food literacy, as conceptualised by Vidgen and Gallegos. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a search of seven databases (PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, EBSCOhost, A+ Education, and ProQuest) was undertaken. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Papers reported on either the development of a tool to explicitly measure food literacy or a part thereof (n = 5); food literacy strategy indicators (n = 1); tools developed to evaluate a food literacy intervention (n = 3); or tools to measure food literacy as a characteristic within a broader study (n = 3). Six tools captured all four domains. None measured all components. Items measuring the same component varied considerably. Most tools referenced a theoretical framework, were validated and reliable. This review will assist practitioners select and develop tools for the measurement of food literacy in their context. MDPI 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6520792/ /pubmed/30965628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040801 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Amouzandeh, Claudia
Fingland, Donna
Vidgen, Helen Anna
A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults
title A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults
title_full A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults
title_fullStr A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults
title_full_unstemmed A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults
title_short A Scoping Review of the Validity, Reliability and Conceptual Alignment of Food Literacy Measures for Adults
title_sort scoping review of the validity, reliability and conceptual alignment of food literacy measures for adults
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30965628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11040801
work_keys_str_mv AT amouzandehclaudia ascopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults
AT finglanddonna ascopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults
AT vidgenhelenanna ascopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults
AT amouzandehclaudia scopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults
AT finglanddonna scopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults
AT vidgenhelenanna scopingreviewofthevalidityreliabilityandconceptualalignmentoffoodliteracymeasuresforadults