Cargando…

Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces

The overselling of health apps that may provide little benefit and even harm needs the health community’s immediate attention. With little formal regulation, a light-touch approach to consumer protection is now warranted to give customers a modicum of information to help them choose from the vast ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wykes, Til, Schueller, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31045497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12390
_version_ 1783418904249368576
author Wykes, Til
Schueller, Stephen
author_facet Wykes, Til
Schueller, Stephen
author_sort Wykes, Til
collection PubMed
description The overselling of health apps that may provide little benefit and even harm needs the health community’s immediate attention. With little formal regulation, a light-touch approach to consumer protection is now warranted to give customers a modicum of information to help them choose from the vast array of so-called health apps. We suggest 4 guiding principles that should be adopted to provide the consumer with information that can guide their choice at the point of download. We call these the Transparency for Trust (T4T) principles, which are derived from experimental studies, systematic reviews, and reports of patient concerns. The T4T principles are (1) privacy and data security, (2) development characteristics, (3) feasibility data, and (4) benefits. All our questions are in a simple form so that all consumers can understand them. We suggest that app stores should take responsibility for providing this information and store it with any app marketed as a health app. Even the absence of information would provide consumers with some understanding and fuel their choice. This would also provide some commercial impetus for app developers to consider this requested information from the outset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6521210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65212102019-06-07 Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces Wykes, Til Schueller, Stephen J Med Internet Res Viewpoint The overselling of health apps that may provide little benefit and even harm needs the health community’s immediate attention. With little formal regulation, a light-touch approach to consumer protection is now warranted to give customers a modicum of information to help them choose from the vast array of so-called health apps. We suggest 4 guiding principles that should be adopted to provide the consumer with information that can guide their choice at the point of download. We call these the Transparency for Trust (T4T) principles, which are derived from experimental studies, systematic reviews, and reports of patient concerns. The T4T principles are (1) privacy and data security, (2) development characteristics, (3) feasibility data, and (4) benefits. All our questions are in a simple form so that all consumers can understand them. We suggest that app stores should take responsibility for providing this information and store it with any app marketed as a health app. Even the absence of information would provide consumers with some understanding and fuel their choice. This would also provide some commercial impetus for app developers to consider this requested information from the outset. JMIR Publications 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6521210/ /pubmed/31045497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12390 Text en ©Til Wykes, Stephen Schueller. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.05.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Wykes, Til
Schueller, Stephen
Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces
title Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces
title_full Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces
title_fullStr Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces
title_full_unstemmed Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces
title_short Why Reviewing Apps Is Not Enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) Principles of Responsible Health App Marketplaces
title_sort why reviewing apps is not enough: transparency for trust (t4t) principles of responsible health app marketplaces
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31045497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12390
work_keys_str_mv AT wykestil whyreviewingappsisnotenoughtransparencyfortrustt4tprinciplesofresponsiblehealthappmarketplaces
AT schuellerstephen whyreviewingappsisnotenoughtransparencyfortrustt4tprinciplesofresponsiblehealthappmarketplaces