Cargando…
Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
BACKGROUND: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column decancellation (VCD) are frequently used methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there are limited reports performed to evaluate the difference of loss of correction and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1170-5 |
_version_ | 1783418972127887360 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yao Xue, Chao Song, Kai Wang, Tianhao Hu, Wenhao Hu, Fanqi Hao, Yongyu Zhang, Zhifa Wang, Chunguo Yang, Xiaoxi Fan, Tianqi Zheng, Guoquan Wang, Zheng Wang, Yan Zhang, Xuesong |
author_facet | Wang, Yao Xue, Chao Song, Kai Wang, Tianhao Hu, Wenhao Hu, Fanqi Hao, Yongyu Zhang, Zhifa Wang, Chunguo Yang, Xiaoxi Fan, Tianqi Zheng, Guoquan Wang, Zheng Wang, Yan Zhang, Xuesong |
author_sort | Wang, Yao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column decancellation (VCD) are frequently used methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there are limited reports performed to evaluate the difference of loss of correction and the effectiveness of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively estimate the effectiveness of correction and loss of correction of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 61 consecutive AS kyphosis patients undergoing PSO or VCD surgery from March 2012 to April 2015. The patients were divided into PSO group (n = 25) and VCD group (n = 36) according to the types of osteotomies. Measurement of the radiographic parameters was performed and the change was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean loss of correction in the global kyphosis was 2.31° in the PSO group and 2.29° in VCD group at the last follow-up, respectively, with no significant difference. Progressive junctional kyphosis occurred in both groups. VCD obtained a significantly larger correction than PSO while sharing a similar incidence of complications. No serious complications were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The PSO osteotomy and VCD osteotomy are both safe and effective methods in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. Mild loss of correction mainly occurred in the global kyphosis in both techniques with no significant difference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6521496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65214962019-05-23 Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up Wang, Yao Xue, Chao Song, Kai Wang, Tianhao Hu, Wenhao Hu, Fanqi Hao, Yongyu Zhang, Zhifa Wang, Chunguo Yang, Xiaoxi Fan, Tianqi Zheng, Guoquan Wang, Zheng Wang, Yan Zhang, Xuesong J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column decancellation (VCD) are frequently used methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there are limited reports performed to evaluate the difference of loss of correction and the effectiveness of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively estimate the effectiveness of correction and loss of correction of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 61 consecutive AS kyphosis patients undergoing PSO or VCD surgery from March 2012 to April 2015. The patients were divided into PSO group (n = 25) and VCD group (n = 36) according to the types of osteotomies. Measurement of the radiographic parameters was performed and the change was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean loss of correction in the global kyphosis was 2.31° in the PSO group and 2.29° in VCD group at the last follow-up, respectively, with no significant difference. Progressive junctional kyphosis occurred in both groups. VCD obtained a significantly larger correction than PSO while sharing a similar incidence of complications. No serious complications were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The PSO osteotomy and VCD osteotomy are both safe and effective methods in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. Mild loss of correction mainly occurred in the global kyphosis in both techniques with no significant difference. BioMed Central 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6521496/ /pubmed/31097011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1170-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Yao Xue, Chao Song, Kai Wang, Tianhao Hu, Wenhao Hu, Fanqi Hao, Yongyu Zhang, Zhifa Wang, Chunguo Yang, Xiaoxi Fan, Tianqi Zheng, Guoquan Wang, Zheng Wang, Yan Zhang, Xuesong Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up |
title | Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up |
title_full | Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up |
title_fullStr | Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up |
title_short | Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up |
title_sort | comparison of loss of correction between pso and vcd technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1170-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT xuechao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT songkai comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT wangtianhao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT huwenhao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT hufanqi comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT haoyongyu comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT zhangzhifa comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT wangchunguo comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT yangxiaoxi comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT fantianqi comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT zhengguoquan comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT wangzheng comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT wangyan comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup AT zhangxuesong comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup |