Cargando…

Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up

BACKGROUND: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column decancellation (VCD) are frequently used methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there are limited reports performed to evaluate the difference of loss of correction and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yao, Xue, Chao, Song, Kai, Wang, Tianhao, Hu, Wenhao, Hu, Fanqi, Hao, Yongyu, Zhang, Zhifa, Wang, Chunguo, Yang, Xiaoxi, Fan, Tianqi, Zheng, Guoquan, Wang, Zheng, Wang, Yan, Zhang, Xuesong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1170-5
_version_ 1783418972127887360
author Wang, Yao
Xue, Chao
Song, Kai
Wang, Tianhao
Hu, Wenhao
Hu, Fanqi
Hao, Yongyu
Zhang, Zhifa
Wang, Chunguo
Yang, Xiaoxi
Fan, Tianqi
Zheng, Guoquan
Wang, Zheng
Wang, Yan
Zhang, Xuesong
author_facet Wang, Yao
Xue, Chao
Song, Kai
Wang, Tianhao
Hu, Wenhao
Hu, Fanqi
Hao, Yongyu
Zhang, Zhifa
Wang, Chunguo
Yang, Xiaoxi
Fan, Tianqi
Zheng, Guoquan
Wang, Zheng
Wang, Yan
Zhang, Xuesong
author_sort Wang, Yao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column decancellation (VCD) are frequently used methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there are limited reports performed to evaluate the difference of loss of correction and the effectiveness of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively estimate the effectiveness of correction and loss of correction of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 61 consecutive AS kyphosis patients undergoing PSO or VCD surgery from March 2012 to April 2015. The patients were divided into PSO group (n = 25) and VCD group (n = 36) according to the types of osteotomies. Measurement of the radiographic parameters was performed and the change was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean loss of correction in the global kyphosis was 2.31° in the PSO group and 2.29° in VCD group at the last follow-up, respectively, with no significant difference. Progressive junctional kyphosis occurred in both groups. VCD obtained a significantly larger correction than PSO while sharing a similar incidence of complications. No serious complications were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The PSO osteotomy and VCD osteotomy are both safe and effective methods in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. Mild loss of correction mainly occurred in the global kyphosis in both techniques with no significant difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6521496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65214962019-05-23 Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up Wang, Yao Xue, Chao Song, Kai Wang, Tianhao Hu, Wenhao Hu, Fanqi Hao, Yongyu Zhang, Zhifa Wang, Chunguo Yang, Xiaoxi Fan, Tianqi Zheng, Guoquan Wang, Zheng Wang, Yan Zhang, Xuesong J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column decancellation (VCD) are frequently used methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there are limited reports performed to evaluate the difference of loss of correction and the effectiveness of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively estimate the effectiveness of correction and loss of correction of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 61 consecutive AS kyphosis patients undergoing PSO or VCD surgery from March 2012 to April 2015. The patients were divided into PSO group (n = 25) and VCD group (n = 36) according to the types of osteotomies. Measurement of the radiographic parameters was performed and the change was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean loss of correction in the global kyphosis was 2.31° in the PSO group and 2.29° in VCD group at the last follow-up, respectively, with no significant difference. Progressive junctional kyphosis occurred in both groups. VCD obtained a significantly larger correction than PSO while sharing a similar incidence of complications. No serious complications were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The PSO osteotomy and VCD osteotomy are both safe and effective methods in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. Mild loss of correction mainly occurred in the global kyphosis in both techniques with no significant difference. BioMed Central 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6521496/ /pubmed/31097011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1170-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yao
Xue, Chao
Song, Kai
Wang, Tianhao
Hu, Wenhao
Hu, Fanqi
Hao, Yongyu
Zhang, Zhifa
Wang, Chunguo
Yang, Xiaoxi
Fan, Tianqi
Zheng, Guoquan
Wang, Zheng
Wang, Yan
Zhang, Xuesong
Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
title Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
title_full Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
title_fullStr Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
title_short Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
title_sort comparison of loss of correction between pso and vcd technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2 years follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1170-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT xuechao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT songkai comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT wangtianhao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT huwenhao comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT hufanqi comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT haoyongyu comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT zhangzhifa comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT wangchunguo comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT yangxiaoxi comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT fantianqi comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT zhengguoquan comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT wangzheng comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT wangyan comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup
AT zhangxuesong comparisonoflossofcorrectionbetweenpsoandvcdtechniqueintreatingthoracolumbarkyphosissecondarytoankylosingspondylitisaminimum2yearsfollowup