Cargando…

The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure

BACKGROUND: The purpose of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to restore stability to the knee. Persistent rotational laxity following ACLR has been correlated with poor outcome and graft failure. We hypothesize that anterolateral complex reconstruction by way of a Modified Lemaire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Getgood, Alan, Bryant, Dianne, Firth, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2589-x
_version_ 1783418981654200320
author Getgood, Alan
Bryant, Dianne
Firth, Andrew
author_facet Getgood, Alan
Bryant, Dianne
Firth, Andrew
author_sort Getgood, Alan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to restore stability to the knee. Persistent rotational laxity following ACLR has been correlated with poor outcome and graft failure. We hypothesize that anterolateral complex reconstruction by way of a Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET) in combination with single bundle ACLR would reduce the risk of persistent rotatory laxity in young individuals who are deemed as being at high risk of failure. We will conduct a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing standard single bundle hamstring ACLR with combined ACLR and LET. METHODS: Six-hundred patients (300 per group) aged 25 years or less with an ACL deficient knee that meet two of the following three criteria will be included: 1) Grade 2 pivot shift or greater; 2) Returning to high risk cutting or pivoting sports; 3) Generalized ligamentous laxity. Participants will be seen at 3-months, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months post-operatively. The primary outcome measure is graft failure requiring revision ACLR or symptomatic instability associated with a positive asymmetric pivot shift indicating persistent rotational laxity. Patients will complete secondary outcome measures at each follow-up visit including patient-reported outcome measures, functional and biomechanical testing, and magnetic resonance imaging. DISCUSSION: This protocol is the first adequately powered randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of augmenting ACLR with an LET in patients at high-risk of graft failure. The successful completion of this trial has the potential to change surgical practice and provide evidence for the role of the LET in ACLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02018354, 23-12-2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6521537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65215372019-05-23 The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure Getgood, Alan Bryant, Dianne Firth, Andrew BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The purpose of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to restore stability to the knee. Persistent rotational laxity following ACLR has been correlated with poor outcome and graft failure. We hypothesize that anterolateral complex reconstruction by way of a Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET) in combination with single bundle ACLR would reduce the risk of persistent rotatory laxity in young individuals who are deemed as being at high risk of failure. We will conduct a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing standard single bundle hamstring ACLR with combined ACLR and LET. METHODS: Six-hundred patients (300 per group) aged 25 years or less with an ACL deficient knee that meet two of the following three criteria will be included: 1) Grade 2 pivot shift or greater; 2) Returning to high risk cutting or pivoting sports; 3) Generalized ligamentous laxity. Participants will be seen at 3-months, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months post-operatively. The primary outcome measure is graft failure requiring revision ACLR or symptomatic instability associated with a positive asymmetric pivot shift indicating persistent rotational laxity. Patients will complete secondary outcome measures at each follow-up visit including patient-reported outcome measures, functional and biomechanical testing, and magnetic resonance imaging. DISCUSSION: This protocol is the first adequately powered randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of augmenting ACLR with an LET in patients at high-risk of graft failure. The successful completion of this trial has the potential to change surgical practice and provide evidence for the role of the LET in ACLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02018354, 23-12-2013. BioMed Central 2019-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6521537/ /pubmed/31092226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2589-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Getgood, Alan
Bryant, Dianne
Firth, Andrew
The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure
title The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure
title_full The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure
title_fullStr The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure
title_full_unstemmed The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure
title_short The Stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure
title_sort stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without lateral extra-articular tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2589-x
work_keys_str_mv AT getgoodalan thestabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure
AT bryantdianne thestabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure
AT firthandrew thestabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure
AT thestabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure
AT getgoodalan stabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure
AT bryantdianne stabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure
AT firthandrew stabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure
AT stabilitystudyaprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithandwithoutlateralextraarticulartenodesisinindividualswhoareathighriskofgraftfailure