Cargando…

Timely, consistent, transparent assessment of market access evidence: implementing tools based on the HTA Core Model® in a pharmaceutical company

OBJECTIVES: Evidence requirements and assessment methods access differ between health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The HTA Core Model(®) provides a standardized approach to HTA, targeting evidence sharing and collaboration between participating HTA bodies. It is fit for purpose from an indu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ducournau, Pierre, Irl, Cornelia, Tatt, Iain, McCarvil, Mary, Gyldmark, Marlene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30789111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462318003653
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Evidence requirements and assessment methods access differ between health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The HTA Core Model(®) provides a standardized approach to HTA, targeting evidence sharing and collaboration between participating HTA bodies. It is fit for purpose from an industry perspective and was used by pharmaceutical company Roche to develop a framework for internal assessment of evidence required for market access and coverage/reimbursement (“access evidence”). METHODS: Tools were developed to systematically scope, assess, plan, and summarize access evidence generation. The tools were based mainly on the first four HTA Core Model(®) domains and rolled-out in selected development teams in 2017. Five months after full implementation, the impact of tools was assessed in an internal survey. RESULTS: Systematic access evidence generation started with the Access Evidence Questionnaire, to scope evidence requirements and identify evidence gaps. Findings were summarized in the Access Evidence Metric, which assessed the alignment of available/planned evidence against HTA bodies’ requirements and developed scope mitigation strategies. The Access Evidence Plan was then used to plan and document (additional) evidence generation. Once generated, evidence was summarized in the Access Evidence Dossier. A survey of twenty-seven Roche employees involved in evidence generation showed that the tools made discussions around access strategies and evidence more efficient and transparent. CONCLUSIONS: The HTA Core Model(®) provided a useful framework around which to optimize internal evidence generation and assessment. The benefits of using a standardized HTA approach in industry mirror those expected from implementing the HTA Core Model® in HTA agencies.