Cargando…
Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers
PURPOSE: The caregiver roles and responsibilities scale (CRRS) was developed to facilitate formal assessment of broad life impacts for informal (i.e. unpaid) caregivers to people with cancer. Here we report the development and initial validation. METHODS: The CRRS was developed from the thematic ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02154-4 |
_version_ | 1783419119852322816 |
---|---|
author | Shilling, Valerie Starkings, Rachel Jenkins, Valerie Cella, David Fallowfield, Lesley |
author_facet | Shilling, Valerie Starkings, Rachel Jenkins, Valerie Cella, David Fallowfield, Lesley |
author_sort | Shilling, Valerie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The caregiver roles and responsibilities scale (CRRS) was developed to facilitate formal assessment of broad life impacts for informal (i.e. unpaid) caregivers to people with cancer. Here we report the development and initial validation. METHODS: The CRRS was developed from the thematic analysis of two interview studies with cancer patients (stage III-IV breast, gynaecological, lung or melanoma) and caregivers. In the evaluation studies, participants completed the CRRS alongside the Caregiver Quality of Life—Cancer, the main criterion measure for concurrent validity, and the WHOQOL-BREF for additional convergent validity data. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, 7-days and 2-months. Demographic data and patient characteristics were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Two-hundred and forty-five caregivers to people with stage I-IV breast, colorectal, gynaecological, head and neck, lung or renal cancer or melanoma completed the CRRS at least once. The final 41 core items selected comprised five subscales: Support and Impact, Lifestyle, Emotional Health and Wellbeing, Self-care and Financial Wellbeing as well as three standalone items. Missing data rate was low (0.6%); there were no ceiling or floor effects for total scores. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92 for the CRRS-41; 0.75–0.87 for the subscales. CRRS showed good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91), sensitivity to change and the predicted pattern of correlation with validation measures r = 0.75–0.89. The standalone 7-item jobs and careers subscale requires further validation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evaluation shows the CRRS has good validity and reliability and is a promising tool for the assessment of the effects of cancer and cancer treatment on the lives and wellbeing of informal caregivers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02154-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6522459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65224592019-06-05 Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers Shilling, Valerie Starkings, Rachel Jenkins, Valerie Cella, David Fallowfield, Lesley Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The caregiver roles and responsibilities scale (CRRS) was developed to facilitate formal assessment of broad life impacts for informal (i.e. unpaid) caregivers to people with cancer. Here we report the development and initial validation. METHODS: The CRRS was developed from the thematic analysis of two interview studies with cancer patients (stage III-IV breast, gynaecological, lung or melanoma) and caregivers. In the evaluation studies, participants completed the CRRS alongside the Caregiver Quality of Life—Cancer, the main criterion measure for concurrent validity, and the WHOQOL-BREF for additional convergent validity data. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, 7-days and 2-months. Demographic data and patient characteristics were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Two-hundred and forty-five caregivers to people with stage I-IV breast, colorectal, gynaecological, head and neck, lung or renal cancer or melanoma completed the CRRS at least once. The final 41 core items selected comprised five subscales: Support and Impact, Lifestyle, Emotional Health and Wellbeing, Self-care and Financial Wellbeing as well as three standalone items. Missing data rate was low (0.6%); there were no ceiling or floor effects for total scores. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92 for the CRRS-41; 0.75–0.87 for the subscales. CRRS showed good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91), sensitivity to change and the predicted pattern of correlation with validation measures r = 0.75–0.89. The standalone 7-item jobs and careers subscale requires further validation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evaluation shows the CRRS has good validity and reliability and is a promising tool for the assessment of the effects of cancer and cancer treatment on the lives and wellbeing of informal caregivers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02154-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-18 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6522459/ /pubmed/30887387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02154-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Shilling, Valerie Starkings, Rachel Jenkins, Valerie Cella, David Fallowfield, Lesley Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers |
title | Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers |
title_full | Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers |
title_short | Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers |
title_sort | development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02154-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shillingvalerie developmentandvalidationofthecaregiverrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancercaregivers AT starkingsrachel developmentandvalidationofthecaregiverrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancercaregivers AT jenkinsvalerie developmentandvalidationofthecaregiverrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancercaregivers AT celladavid developmentandvalidationofthecaregiverrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancercaregivers AT fallowfieldlesley developmentandvalidationofthecaregiverrolesandresponsibilitiesscaleincancercaregivers |