Cargando…
Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
INTRODUCTION: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been sh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5 |
_version_ | 1783419144972009472 |
---|---|
author | Claeys, Kimberly C. Zasowski, Evan J. Trinh, Trang D. Casapao, Anthony M. Pogue, Jason M. Bhatia, Nitin Mynatt, Ryan P. Wilson, Suprat S. Arthur, Crystal Welch, Robert Sherwin, Robert Hafeez, Wasif Levine, Donald P. Kaye, Keith S. Delgado, George Giuliano, Christopher A. Takla, Robert Rieck, Colleen Johnson, Leonard B. Murray, Kyle P. Gordon, James Reyes, Kate Hartman, Pamela Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. |
author_facet | Claeys, Kimberly C. Zasowski, Evan J. Trinh, Trang D. Casapao, Anthony M. Pogue, Jason M. Bhatia, Nitin Mynatt, Ryan P. Wilson, Suprat S. Arthur, Crystal Welch, Robert Sherwin, Robert Hafeez, Wasif Levine, Donald P. Kaye, Keith S. Delgado, George Giuliano, Christopher A. Takla, Robert Rieck, Colleen Johnson, Leonard B. Murray, Kyle P. Gordon, James Reyes, Kate Hartman, Pamela Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. |
author_sort | Claeys, Kimberly C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin and may result in faster resolution of signs of infection. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial of ceftaroline versus vancomycin for the treatment of adult patients admitted for management of ABSSSIs from April 2012 to May 2016; 166 patients in the clinically evaluable (CE) group were needed to determine a 20% difference in primary outcome of clinical response at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Clinical response was defined as cessation of spread of lesion and improvement in systemic signs/symptoms of infection. A secondary outcome was a ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 108 were CE. Among CE patients, 54 were randomized to ceftaroline and 54 to vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the ceftaroline arm were older and had a non-significantly higher degree of comorbidities (median Charlson score 2 vs. 4, respectively). Cellulitis was the most common type of ABSSSI (85.2% vs. 79.6%, respectively). Rapid diagnostic testing of available cultures (n = 55) demonstrated high agreement with clinical microbiology for identification of Staphylococcus aureus (100%) and MRSA (100%). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of day 2 or 3 clinical response (50.0% vs. 51.9%). CONCLUSION: Early clinical response between vancomycin- and ceftaroline-treated ABSSSIs was similar. Patients with ABSSSIs rarely remained hospitalized for > 2–3 days, thus limiting our ability to critically assess clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02582203. FUNDING: Allergan plc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6522568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65225682019-06-05 Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Claeys, Kimberly C. Zasowski, Evan J. Trinh, Trang D. Casapao, Anthony M. Pogue, Jason M. Bhatia, Nitin Mynatt, Ryan P. Wilson, Suprat S. Arthur, Crystal Welch, Robert Sherwin, Robert Hafeez, Wasif Levine, Donald P. Kaye, Keith S. Delgado, George Giuliano, Christopher A. Takla, Robert Rieck, Colleen Johnson, Leonard B. Murray, Kyle P. Gordon, James Reyes, Kate Hartman, Pamela Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin and may result in faster resolution of signs of infection. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial of ceftaroline versus vancomycin for the treatment of adult patients admitted for management of ABSSSIs from April 2012 to May 2016; 166 patients in the clinically evaluable (CE) group were needed to determine a 20% difference in primary outcome of clinical response at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Clinical response was defined as cessation of spread of lesion and improvement in systemic signs/symptoms of infection. A secondary outcome was a ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 108 were CE. Among CE patients, 54 were randomized to ceftaroline and 54 to vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the ceftaroline arm were older and had a non-significantly higher degree of comorbidities (median Charlson score 2 vs. 4, respectively). Cellulitis was the most common type of ABSSSI (85.2% vs. 79.6%, respectively). Rapid diagnostic testing of available cultures (n = 55) demonstrated high agreement with clinical microbiology for identification of Staphylococcus aureus (100%) and MRSA (100%). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of day 2 or 3 clinical response (50.0% vs. 51.9%). CONCLUSION: Early clinical response between vancomycin- and ceftaroline-treated ABSSSIs was similar. Patients with ABSSSIs rarely remained hospitalized for > 2–3 days, thus limiting our ability to critically assess clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02582203. FUNDING: Allergan plc. Springer Healthcare 2019-03-27 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6522568/ /pubmed/30915685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Claeys, Kimberly C. Zasowski, Evan J. Trinh, Trang D. Casapao, Anthony M. Pogue, Jason M. Bhatia, Nitin Mynatt, Ryan P. Wilson, Suprat S. Arthur, Crystal Welch, Robert Sherwin, Robert Hafeez, Wasif Levine, Donald P. Kaye, Keith S. Delgado, George Giuliano, Christopher A. Takla, Robert Rieck, Colleen Johnson, Leonard B. Murray, Kyle P. Gordon, James Reyes, Kate Hartman, Pamela Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title | Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_full | Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_fullStr | Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_full_unstemmed | Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_short | Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_sort | open-label randomized trial of early clinical outcomes of ceftaroline fosamil versus vancomycin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections at risk of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claeyskimberlyc openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT zasowskievanj openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT trinhtrangd openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT casapaoanthonym openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT poguejasonm openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT bhatianitin openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT mynattryanp openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT wilsonsuprats openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT arthurcrystal openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT welchrobert openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT sherwinrobert openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT hafeezwasif openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT levinedonaldp openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT kayekeiths openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT delgadogeorge openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT giulianochristophera openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT taklarobert openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT rieckcolleen openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT johnsonleonardb openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT murraykylep openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT gordonjames openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT reyeskate openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT hartmanpamela openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT davissusanl openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT rybakmichaelj openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus |