Cargando…

Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

INTRODUCTION: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claeys, Kimberly C., Zasowski, Evan J., Trinh, Trang D., Casapao, Anthony M., Pogue, Jason M., Bhatia, Nitin, Mynatt, Ryan P., Wilson, Suprat S., Arthur, Crystal, Welch, Robert, Sherwin, Robert, Hafeez, Wasif, Levine, Donald P., Kaye, Keith S., Delgado, George, Giuliano, Christopher A., Takla, Robert, Rieck, Colleen, Johnson, Leonard B., Murray, Kyle P., Gordon, James, Reyes, Kate, Hartman, Pamela, Davis, Susan L., Rybak, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5
_version_ 1783419144972009472
author Claeys, Kimberly C.
Zasowski, Evan J.
Trinh, Trang D.
Casapao, Anthony M.
Pogue, Jason M.
Bhatia, Nitin
Mynatt, Ryan P.
Wilson, Suprat S.
Arthur, Crystal
Welch, Robert
Sherwin, Robert
Hafeez, Wasif
Levine, Donald P.
Kaye, Keith S.
Delgado, George
Giuliano, Christopher A.
Takla, Robert
Rieck, Colleen
Johnson, Leonard B.
Murray, Kyle P.
Gordon, James
Reyes, Kate
Hartman, Pamela
Davis, Susan L.
Rybak, Michael J.
author_facet Claeys, Kimberly C.
Zasowski, Evan J.
Trinh, Trang D.
Casapao, Anthony M.
Pogue, Jason M.
Bhatia, Nitin
Mynatt, Ryan P.
Wilson, Suprat S.
Arthur, Crystal
Welch, Robert
Sherwin, Robert
Hafeez, Wasif
Levine, Donald P.
Kaye, Keith S.
Delgado, George
Giuliano, Christopher A.
Takla, Robert
Rieck, Colleen
Johnson, Leonard B.
Murray, Kyle P.
Gordon, James
Reyes, Kate
Hartman, Pamela
Davis, Susan L.
Rybak, Michael J.
author_sort Claeys, Kimberly C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin and may result in faster resolution of signs of infection. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial of ceftaroline versus vancomycin for the treatment of adult patients admitted for management of ABSSSIs from April 2012 to May 2016; 166 patients in the clinically evaluable (CE) group were needed to determine a 20% difference in primary outcome of clinical response at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Clinical response was defined as cessation of spread of lesion and improvement in systemic signs/symptoms of infection. A secondary outcome was a ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 108 were CE. Among CE patients, 54 were randomized to ceftaroline and 54 to vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the ceftaroline arm were older and had a non-significantly higher degree of comorbidities (median Charlson score 2 vs. 4, respectively). Cellulitis was the most common type of ABSSSI (85.2% vs. 79.6%, respectively). Rapid diagnostic testing of available cultures (n = 55) demonstrated high agreement with clinical microbiology for identification of Staphylococcus aureus (100%) and MRSA (100%). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of day 2 or 3 clinical response (50.0% vs. 51.9%). CONCLUSION: Early clinical response between vancomycin- and ceftaroline-treated ABSSSIs was similar. Patients with ABSSSIs rarely remained hospitalized for > 2–3 days, thus limiting our ability to critically assess clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02582203. FUNDING: Allergan plc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6522568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65225682019-06-05 Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Claeys, Kimberly C. Zasowski, Evan J. Trinh, Trang D. Casapao, Anthony M. Pogue, Jason M. Bhatia, Nitin Mynatt, Ryan P. Wilson, Suprat S. Arthur, Crystal Welch, Robert Sherwin, Robert Hafeez, Wasif Levine, Donald P. Kaye, Keith S. Delgado, George Giuliano, Christopher A. Takla, Robert Rieck, Colleen Johnson, Leonard B. Murray, Kyle P. Gordon, James Reyes, Kate Hartman, Pamela Davis, Susan L. Rybak, Michael J. Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin and may result in faster resolution of signs of infection. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial of ceftaroline versus vancomycin for the treatment of adult patients admitted for management of ABSSSIs from April 2012 to May 2016; 166 patients in the clinically evaluable (CE) group were needed to determine a 20% difference in primary outcome of clinical response at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Clinical response was defined as cessation of spread of lesion and improvement in systemic signs/symptoms of infection. A secondary outcome was a ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 108 were CE. Among CE patients, 54 were randomized to ceftaroline and 54 to vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the ceftaroline arm were older and had a non-significantly higher degree of comorbidities (median Charlson score 2 vs. 4, respectively). Cellulitis was the most common type of ABSSSI (85.2% vs. 79.6%, respectively). Rapid diagnostic testing of available cultures (n = 55) demonstrated high agreement with clinical microbiology for identification of Staphylococcus aureus (100%) and MRSA (100%). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of day 2 or 3 clinical response (50.0% vs. 51.9%). CONCLUSION: Early clinical response between vancomycin- and ceftaroline-treated ABSSSIs was similar. Patients with ABSSSIs rarely remained hospitalized for > 2–3 days, thus limiting our ability to critically assess clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02582203. FUNDING: Allergan plc. Springer Healthcare 2019-03-27 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6522568/ /pubmed/30915685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Claeys, Kimberly C.
Zasowski, Evan J.
Trinh, Trang D.
Casapao, Anthony M.
Pogue, Jason M.
Bhatia, Nitin
Mynatt, Ryan P.
Wilson, Suprat S.
Arthur, Crystal
Welch, Robert
Sherwin, Robert
Hafeez, Wasif
Levine, Donald P.
Kaye, Keith S.
Delgado, George
Giuliano, Christopher A.
Takla, Robert
Rieck, Colleen
Johnson, Leonard B.
Murray, Kyle P.
Gordon, James
Reyes, Kate
Hartman, Pamela
Davis, Susan L.
Rybak, Michael J.
Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_short Open-Label Randomized Trial of Early Clinical Outcomes of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections at Risk of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort open-label randomized trial of early clinical outcomes of ceftaroline fosamil versus vancomycin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections at risk of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0242-5
work_keys_str_mv AT claeyskimberlyc openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT zasowskievanj openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT trinhtrangd openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT casapaoanthonym openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT poguejasonm openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT bhatianitin openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT mynattryanp openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT wilsonsuprats openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT arthurcrystal openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT welchrobert openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT sherwinrobert openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT hafeezwasif openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT levinedonaldp openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT kayekeiths openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT delgadogeorge openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT giulianochristophera openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT taklarobert openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT rieckcolleen openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT johnsonleonardb openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT murraykylep openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT gordonjames openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT reyeskate openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT hartmanpamela openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT davissusanl openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT rybakmichaelj openlabelrandomizedtrialofearlyclinicaloutcomesofceftarolinefosamilversusvancomycinforthetreatmentofacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsatriskofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus