Cargando…

An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa

INTRODUCTION: Past endeavours to deal with the obstacle of expensive Cluster of Difference 4 (CD4(+)) count diagnostics in resource-limited settings have left a long trail of suggested continuous CD4(+) count clinical covariates that turned out to be a potentially important integral part of the huma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinarwo, Partson, Zewotir, Temesgen, Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla, Garrett, Nigel J., North, Delia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30756260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0235-4
_version_ 1783419145671409664
author Tinarwo, Partson
Zewotir, Temesgen
Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla
Garrett, Nigel J.
North, Delia
author_facet Tinarwo, Partson
Zewotir, Temesgen
Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla
Garrett, Nigel J.
North, Delia
author_sort Tinarwo, Partson
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Past endeavours to deal with the obstacle of expensive Cluster of Difference 4 (CD4(+)) count diagnostics in resource-limited settings have left a long trail of suggested continuous CD4(+) count clinical covariates that turned out to be a potentially important integral part of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment process during disease progression. However, an evaluation to determine the strongest candidates among these CD4(+) count covariates has not been well documented. METHODS: The Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) initially enrolled HIV-negative (phase 1) patients into different study cohorts. The patients who seroconverted (237) during follow-up care were enrolled again into a post-HIV infection cohort where they were further followed up with weekly to fortnightly visits up to 3 months (phase 2: acute infection), monthly visits from 3–12 months (phase 3: early infection) and quarterly visits thereafter (phase 4: established infection) until antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation (phase 5). The CD4(+) count and 46 covariates were repeatedly measured at each phase of the HIV disease progression. A multilevel partial least squares approach was applied as a variable reduction technique to determine the strongest CD4(+) count covariates. RESULTS: Only 18 of the 46 investigated clinical attributes were the strongest CD4(+) count covariates and the top 8 were positively and independently associated with the CD4(+) count. Besides the confirmatory lymphocytes, these were basophils, albumin, haematocrit, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelets, potassium and monocytes. Overall, electrolytes, proteins and red blood cells were the dominant categories for the strongest covariates. CONCLUSION: Only a few of the many previously suggested continuous CD4(+) count clinical covariates showed the potential to become an important integral part of the treatment process. Prolonging the pre-treatment period of the HIV disease progression by effectively incorporating and managing the covariates for long-term influence on the CD4(+) cell response has the potential to delay challenges associated with ART side effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-019-0235-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6522572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65225722019-06-05 An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa Tinarwo, Partson Zewotir, Temesgen Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla Garrett, Nigel J. North, Delia Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Past endeavours to deal with the obstacle of expensive Cluster of Difference 4 (CD4(+)) count diagnostics in resource-limited settings have left a long trail of suggested continuous CD4(+) count clinical covariates that turned out to be a potentially important integral part of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment process during disease progression. However, an evaluation to determine the strongest candidates among these CD4(+) count covariates has not been well documented. METHODS: The Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) initially enrolled HIV-negative (phase 1) patients into different study cohorts. The patients who seroconverted (237) during follow-up care were enrolled again into a post-HIV infection cohort where they were further followed up with weekly to fortnightly visits up to 3 months (phase 2: acute infection), monthly visits from 3–12 months (phase 3: early infection) and quarterly visits thereafter (phase 4: established infection) until antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation (phase 5). The CD4(+) count and 46 covariates were repeatedly measured at each phase of the HIV disease progression. A multilevel partial least squares approach was applied as a variable reduction technique to determine the strongest CD4(+) count covariates. RESULTS: Only 18 of the 46 investigated clinical attributes were the strongest CD4(+) count covariates and the top 8 were positively and independently associated with the CD4(+) count. Besides the confirmatory lymphocytes, these were basophils, albumin, haematocrit, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelets, potassium and monocytes. Overall, electrolytes, proteins and red blood cells were the dominant categories for the strongest covariates. CONCLUSION: Only a few of the many previously suggested continuous CD4(+) count clinical covariates showed the potential to become an important integral part of the treatment process. Prolonging the pre-treatment period of the HIV disease progression by effectively incorporating and managing the covariates for long-term influence on the CD4(+) cell response has the potential to delay challenges associated with ART side effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-019-0235-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-02-12 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6522572/ /pubmed/30756260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0235-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tinarwo, Partson
Zewotir, Temesgen
Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla
Garrett, Nigel J.
North, Delia
An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa
title An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa
title_full An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa
title_fullStr An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa
title_short An Evaluation to Determine the Strongest CD4 Count Covariates during HIV Disease Progression in Women in South Africa
title_sort evaluation to determine the strongest cd4 count covariates during hiv disease progression in women in south africa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30756260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0235-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tinarwopartson anevaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT zewotirtemesgen anevaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT yendezumanonhlanhla anevaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT garrettnigelj anevaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT northdelia anevaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT tinarwopartson evaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT zewotirtemesgen evaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT yendezumanonhlanhla evaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT garrettnigelj evaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica
AT northdelia evaluationtodeterminethestrongestcd4countcovariatesduringhivdiseaseprogressioninwomeninsouthafrica