Cargando…

A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective analysis compares the probability of target attainment (PTA) for ceftriaxone, levofloxacin and ceftaroline fosamil against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in a representative patient population with moderate-to-severe commun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cristinacce, Andrew, Wright, James G., Stone, Gregory G., Hammond, Jennifer, McFadyen, Lynn, Raber, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30963520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0243-4
_version_ 1783419148272926720
author Cristinacce, Andrew
Wright, James G.
Stone, Gregory G.
Hammond, Jennifer
McFadyen, Lynn
Raber, Susan
author_facet Cristinacce, Andrew
Wright, James G.
Stone, Gregory G.
Hammond, Jennifer
McFadyen, Lynn
Raber, Susan
author_sort Cristinacce, Andrew
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This retrospective analysis compares the probability of target attainment (PTA) for ceftriaxone, levofloxacin and ceftaroline fosamil against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in a representative patient population with moderate-to-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, and an existing model for ceftaroline, were used with standard dosage regimens for simulating individual PK data with covariates representative of patients with CAP (5000 patients/drug regimen). PTA for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets was calculated from steady state PK profiles for a range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) were also calculated using MIC distributions from 2012 to 2017 global surveillance data. RESULTS: Ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg q12 h) achieved > 90% PTA at all exposure targets for each pathogen at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) susceptibility breakpoints, and CFRs were > 99%. Ceftriaxone, but not levofloxacin, achieved 100% PTA and > 90% CFR against S. pneumoniae. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone achieved high PTA and CFR against H. influenzae. Levofloxacin achieved PTAs < 90% at EUCAST/CLSI breakpoints and ceftriaxone achieved PTAs < 90% at MICs up to 2 mg/L against S. aureus; both agents produced generally low CFRs against S. aureus (except levofloxacin against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus), reflecting the lack of activity of these agents against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. CONCLUSION: Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated higher overall PTA rates than levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, in particular against S. aureus. These results provide insight regarding the potential comparative efficacy of the described antibiotics for moderate-to-severe CAP. FUNDING: Pfizer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6522587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65225872019-06-05 A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators Cristinacce, Andrew Wright, James G. Stone, Gregory G. Hammond, Jennifer McFadyen, Lynn Raber, Susan Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This retrospective analysis compares the probability of target attainment (PTA) for ceftriaxone, levofloxacin and ceftaroline fosamil against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in a representative patient population with moderate-to-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, and an existing model for ceftaroline, were used with standard dosage regimens for simulating individual PK data with covariates representative of patients with CAP (5000 patients/drug regimen). PTA for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets was calculated from steady state PK profiles for a range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) were also calculated using MIC distributions from 2012 to 2017 global surveillance data. RESULTS: Ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg q12 h) achieved > 90% PTA at all exposure targets for each pathogen at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) susceptibility breakpoints, and CFRs were > 99%. Ceftriaxone, but not levofloxacin, achieved 100% PTA and > 90% CFR against S. pneumoniae. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone achieved high PTA and CFR against H. influenzae. Levofloxacin achieved PTAs < 90% at EUCAST/CLSI breakpoints and ceftriaxone achieved PTAs < 90% at MICs up to 2 mg/L against S. aureus; both agents produced generally low CFRs against S. aureus (except levofloxacin against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus), reflecting the lack of activity of these agents against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. CONCLUSION: Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated higher overall PTA rates than levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, in particular against S. aureus. These results provide insight regarding the potential comparative efficacy of the described antibiotics for moderate-to-severe CAP. FUNDING: Pfizer. Springer Healthcare 2019-04-08 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6522587/ /pubmed/30963520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0243-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cristinacce, Andrew
Wright, James G.
Stone, Gregory G.
Hammond, Jennifer
McFadyen, Lynn
Raber, Susan
A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators
title A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators
title_full A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators
title_fullStr A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators
title_short A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators
title_sort retrospective analysis of probability of target attainment in community-acquired pneumonia: ceftaroline fosamil versus comparators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30963520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0243-4
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinacceandrew aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT wrightjamesg aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT stonegregoryg aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT hammondjennifer aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT mcfadyenlynn aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT rabersusan aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT cristinacceandrew retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT wrightjamesg retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT stonegregoryg retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT hammondjennifer retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT mcfadyenlynn retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators
AT rabersusan retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators