Cargando…
A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators
INTRODUCTION: This retrospective analysis compares the probability of target attainment (PTA) for ceftriaxone, levofloxacin and ceftaroline fosamil against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in a representative patient population with moderate-to-severe commun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30963520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0243-4 |
_version_ | 1783419148272926720 |
---|---|
author | Cristinacce, Andrew Wright, James G. Stone, Gregory G. Hammond, Jennifer McFadyen, Lynn Raber, Susan |
author_facet | Cristinacce, Andrew Wright, James G. Stone, Gregory G. Hammond, Jennifer McFadyen, Lynn Raber, Susan |
author_sort | Cristinacce, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This retrospective analysis compares the probability of target attainment (PTA) for ceftriaxone, levofloxacin and ceftaroline fosamil against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in a representative patient population with moderate-to-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, and an existing model for ceftaroline, were used with standard dosage regimens for simulating individual PK data with covariates representative of patients with CAP (5000 patients/drug regimen). PTA for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets was calculated from steady state PK profiles for a range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) were also calculated using MIC distributions from 2012 to 2017 global surveillance data. RESULTS: Ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg q12 h) achieved > 90% PTA at all exposure targets for each pathogen at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) susceptibility breakpoints, and CFRs were > 99%. Ceftriaxone, but not levofloxacin, achieved 100% PTA and > 90% CFR against S. pneumoniae. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone achieved high PTA and CFR against H. influenzae. Levofloxacin achieved PTAs < 90% at EUCAST/CLSI breakpoints and ceftriaxone achieved PTAs < 90% at MICs up to 2 mg/L against S. aureus; both agents produced generally low CFRs against S. aureus (except levofloxacin against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus), reflecting the lack of activity of these agents against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. CONCLUSION: Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated higher overall PTA rates than levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, in particular against S. aureus. These results provide insight regarding the potential comparative efficacy of the described antibiotics for moderate-to-severe CAP. FUNDING: Pfizer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6522587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65225872019-06-05 A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators Cristinacce, Andrew Wright, James G. Stone, Gregory G. Hammond, Jennifer McFadyen, Lynn Raber, Susan Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This retrospective analysis compares the probability of target attainment (PTA) for ceftriaxone, levofloxacin and ceftaroline fosamil against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in a representative patient population with moderate-to-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, and an existing model for ceftaroline, were used with standard dosage regimens for simulating individual PK data with covariates representative of patients with CAP (5000 patients/drug regimen). PTA for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets was calculated from steady state PK profiles for a range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) were also calculated using MIC distributions from 2012 to 2017 global surveillance data. RESULTS: Ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg q12 h) achieved > 90% PTA at all exposure targets for each pathogen at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) susceptibility breakpoints, and CFRs were > 99%. Ceftriaxone, but not levofloxacin, achieved 100% PTA and > 90% CFR against S. pneumoniae. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone achieved high PTA and CFR against H. influenzae. Levofloxacin achieved PTAs < 90% at EUCAST/CLSI breakpoints and ceftriaxone achieved PTAs < 90% at MICs up to 2 mg/L against S. aureus; both agents produced generally low CFRs against S. aureus (except levofloxacin against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus), reflecting the lack of activity of these agents against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. CONCLUSION: Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated higher overall PTA rates than levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, in particular against S. aureus. These results provide insight regarding the potential comparative efficacy of the described antibiotics for moderate-to-severe CAP. FUNDING: Pfizer. Springer Healthcare 2019-04-08 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6522587/ /pubmed/30963520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0243-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cristinacce, Andrew Wright, James G. Stone, Gregory G. Hammond, Jennifer McFadyen, Lynn Raber, Susan A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators |
title | A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators |
title_full | A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators |
title_short | A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of probability of target attainment in community-acquired pneumonia: ceftaroline fosamil versus comparators |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30963520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0243-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cristinacceandrew aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT wrightjamesg aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT stonegregoryg aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT hammondjennifer aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT mcfadyenlynn aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT rabersusan aretrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT cristinacceandrew retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT wrightjamesg retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT stonegregoryg retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT hammondjennifer retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT mcfadyenlynn retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators AT rabersusan retrospectiveanalysisofprobabilityoftargetattainmentincommunityacquiredpneumoniaceftarolinefosamilversuscomparators |