Cargando…
Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress
Pacing behaviour, the most frequent stereotypic behaviour displayed by laboratory rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) is often used as an indicator of stress. In this study, we investigated how reliable this welfare indicator is at detecting acute stress by testing the reaction of macaques to the stres...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43695-5 |
_version_ | 1783419151159656448 |
---|---|
author | Poirier, Colline Oliver, Caitlin J. Castellano Bueno, Janire Flecknell, Paul Bateson, Melissa |
author_facet | Poirier, Colline Oliver, Caitlin J. Castellano Bueno, Janire Flecknell, Paul Bateson, Melissa |
author_sort | Poirier, Colline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pacing behaviour, the most frequent stereotypic behaviour displayed by laboratory rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) is often used as an indicator of stress. In this study, we investigated how reliable this welfare indicator is at detecting acute stress by testing the reaction of macaques to the stressful event of being exposed to an agonistic interaction between conspecifics housed in the same room but in a different cage. Pacing, agitated locomotion, and stress-related displacement behaviours were quantified before, during and after agonistic interaction exposure, based on video recordings of 13 socially-housed macaques in their home cage. Displacement behaviours increased after agonistic interaction exposure, confirming that the events were experienced as stressful by the focal individuals. The occurrence of pacing did not increase during or after the agonistic interactions. Instead, agitated locomotion increased during the agonistic interactions. These results suggest either, that pacing as an indicator of acute stress is prone to false negative results, increasing in some stressful situations but not others, or that agitated locomotion has been mistaken for pacing in previous studies and that pacing is in fact unrelated to current acute stress. Both interpretations lead to the conclusion that pacing is unreliable as an indicator of acute stress in laboratory rhesus macaques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6522602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65226022019-05-28 Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress Poirier, Colline Oliver, Caitlin J. Castellano Bueno, Janire Flecknell, Paul Bateson, Melissa Sci Rep Article Pacing behaviour, the most frequent stereotypic behaviour displayed by laboratory rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) is often used as an indicator of stress. In this study, we investigated how reliable this welfare indicator is at detecting acute stress by testing the reaction of macaques to the stressful event of being exposed to an agonistic interaction between conspecifics housed in the same room but in a different cage. Pacing, agitated locomotion, and stress-related displacement behaviours were quantified before, during and after agonistic interaction exposure, based on video recordings of 13 socially-housed macaques in their home cage. Displacement behaviours increased after agonistic interaction exposure, confirming that the events were experienced as stressful by the focal individuals. The occurrence of pacing did not increase during or after the agonistic interactions. Instead, agitated locomotion increased during the agonistic interactions. These results suggest either, that pacing as an indicator of acute stress is prone to false negative results, increasing in some stressful situations but not others, or that agitated locomotion has been mistaken for pacing in previous studies and that pacing is in fact unrelated to current acute stress. Both interpretations lead to the conclusion that pacing is unreliable as an indicator of acute stress in laboratory rhesus macaques. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6522602/ /pubmed/31097776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43695-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Poirier, Colline Oliver, Caitlin J. Castellano Bueno, Janire Flecknell, Paul Bateson, Melissa Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress |
title | Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress |
title_full | Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress |
title_fullStr | Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress |
title_full_unstemmed | Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress |
title_short | Pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress |
title_sort | pacing behaviour in laboratory macaques is an unreliable indicator of acute stress |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43695-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poiriercolline pacingbehaviourinlaboratorymacaquesisanunreliableindicatorofacutestress AT olivercaitlinj pacingbehaviourinlaboratorymacaquesisanunreliableindicatorofacutestress AT castellanobuenojanire pacingbehaviourinlaboratorymacaquesisanunreliableindicatorofacutestress AT flecknellpaul pacingbehaviourinlaboratorymacaquesisanunreliableindicatorofacutestress AT batesonmelissa pacingbehaviourinlaboratorymacaquesisanunreliableindicatorofacutestress |