Cargando…

Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4

INTRODUCTION: Radiolabeled exendin-4 (Ex4) derivatives are used to target the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) for the clinical diagnosis of insulinomas, a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Gallium-68 is an ideal diagnostic nuclide for this application and a study evaluating an exendin-4-N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaeppeli, Simon A. M., Schibli, Roger, Mindt, Thomas L., Behe, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9
_version_ 1783419154711183360
author Kaeppeli, Simon A. M.
Schibli, Roger
Mindt, Thomas L.
Behe, Martin
author_facet Kaeppeli, Simon A. M.
Schibli, Roger
Mindt, Thomas L.
Behe, Martin
author_sort Kaeppeli, Simon A. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radiolabeled exendin-4 (Ex4) derivatives are used to target the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) for the clinical diagnosis of insulinomas, a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Gallium-68 is an ideal diagnostic nuclide for this application and a study evaluating an exendin-4-NODAGA conjugate is currently underway. However, in complexion with the chelator DFO, its in vivo stability has been a matter of dispute. The aim of this work was to directly compare [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD with [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In our approach, we directly compared N′-[5-(acetyl-hydroxy-amino)pentyl]-N-[5-[3-(5-aminopentyl-hydroxy-carbamoyl)propanoylamino]pentyl]-N-hydroxy-butane diamide (desferriox-amine B, DFO) and 2-(4,7-bis (carboxymethyl)-1,4,7-triazonan-1-yl) pentanedioic acid (NODAGA) conjugated to exendin-4 in vitro and in vivo. We radiolabeled the peptides with gallium-68, followed by HPLC quality control. In vitro characterization was performed in CHL cells overexpressing the GLP-1R and in vivo studies were conducted with CD1 nu/nu mice carrying tumors derived from these cells. RESULTS: We found that both peptides could be radiolabeled with a molar activity of about 9.33 MBq/nmol without further purification. They internalized equally well into GLP-1R-expressing cells and their IC(50) was similar with 15.6 ± 7.8 nM and 18.4 ± 3.0 nM for [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD and [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO, respectively. In vivo, [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD accumulated more in all tissue, while [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO exhibited a more favorable target-to-kidney ratio. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DFO is a suitable chelator for the radiolabeling of exendin-4 derivatives with gallium-68 for in vitro and preclinical in vivo studies. DFO performed better in vivo due to its significantly lower kidney accumulation (p < 0.0001). It was also found to be stable in vivo in mice, contrary to earlier reports. Based on our results, the DFO chelating system in combination with exendin-4 would be an interesting option for clinical imaging of insulinomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6522624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65226242019-06-05 Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 Kaeppeli, Simon A. M. Schibli, Roger Mindt, Thomas L. Behe, Martin EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem Research Article INTRODUCTION: Radiolabeled exendin-4 (Ex4) derivatives are used to target the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) for the clinical diagnosis of insulinomas, a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Gallium-68 is an ideal diagnostic nuclide for this application and a study evaluating an exendin-4-NODAGA conjugate is currently underway. However, in complexion with the chelator DFO, its in vivo stability has been a matter of dispute. The aim of this work was to directly compare [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD with [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In our approach, we directly compared N′-[5-(acetyl-hydroxy-amino)pentyl]-N-[5-[3-(5-aminopentyl-hydroxy-carbamoyl)propanoylamino]pentyl]-N-hydroxy-butane diamide (desferriox-amine B, DFO) and 2-(4,7-bis (carboxymethyl)-1,4,7-triazonan-1-yl) pentanedioic acid (NODAGA) conjugated to exendin-4 in vitro and in vivo. We radiolabeled the peptides with gallium-68, followed by HPLC quality control. In vitro characterization was performed in CHL cells overexpressing the GLP-1R and in vivo studies were conducted with CD1 nu/nu mice carrying tumors derived from these cells. RESULTS: We found that both peptides could be radiolabeled with a molar activity of about 9.33 MBq/nmol without further purification. They internalized equally well into GLP-1R-expressing cells and their IC(50) was similar with 15.6 ± 7.8 nM and 18.4 ± 3.0 nM for [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD and [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO, respectively. In vivo, [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD accumulated more in all tissue, while [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO exhibited a more favorable target-to-kidney ratio. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DFO is a suitable chelator for the radiolabeling of exendin-4 derivatives with gallium-68 for in vitro and preclinical in vivo studies. DFO performed better in vivo due to its significantly lower kidney accumulation (p < 0.0001). It was also found to be stable in vivo in mice, contrary to earlier reports. Based on our results, the DFO chelating system in combination with exendin-4 would be an interesting option for clinical imaging of insulinomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6522624/ /pubmed/31659487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaeppeli, Simon A. M.
Schibli, Roger
Mindt, Thomas L.
Behe, Martin
Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
title Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
title_full Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
title_fullStr Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
title_short Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
title_sort comparison of desferrioxamine and nodaga for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kaeppelisimonam comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4
AT schibliroger comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4
AT mindtthomasl comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4
AT behemartin comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4