Cargando…
Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4
INTRODUCTION: Radiolabeled exendin-4 (Ex4) derivatives are used to target the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) for the clinical diagnosis of insulinomas, a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Gallium-68 is an ideal diagnostic nuclide for this application and a study evaluating an exendin-4-N...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9 |
_version_ | 1783419154711183360 |
---|---|
author | Kaeppeli, Simon A. M. Schibli, Roger Mindt, Thomas L. Behe, Martin |
author_facet | Kaeppeli, Simon A. M. Schibli, Roger Mindt, Thomas L. Behe, Martin |
author_sort | Kaeppeli, Simon A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Radiolabeled exendin-4 (Ex4) derivatives are used to target the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) for the clinical diagnosis of insulinomas, a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Gallium-68 is an ideal diagnostic nuclide for this application and a study evaluating an exendin-4-NODAGA conjugate is currently underway. However, in complexion with the chelator DFO, its in vivo stability has been a matter of dispute. The aim of this work was to directly compare [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD with [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In our approach, we directly compared N′-[5-(acetyl-hydroxy-amino)pentyl]-N-[5-[3-(5-aminopentyl-hydroxy-carbamoyl)propanoylamino]pentyl]-N-hydroxy-butane diamide (desferriox-amine B, DFO) and 2-(4,7-bis (carboxymethyl)-1,4,7-triazonan-1-yl) pentanedioic acid (NODAGA) conjugated to exendin-4 in vitro and in vivo. We radiolabeled the peptides with gallium-68, followed by HPLC quality control. In vitro characterization was performed in CHL cells overexpressing the GLP-1R and in vivo studies were conducted with CD1 nu/nu mice carrying tumors derived from these cells. RESULTS: We found that both peptides could be radiolabeled with a molar activity of about 9.33 MBq/nmol without further purification. They internalized equally well into GLP-1R-expressing cells and their IC(50) was similar with 15.6 ± 7.8 nM and 18.4 ± 3.0 nM for [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD and [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO, respectively. In vivo, [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD accumulated more in all tissue, while [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO exhibited a more favorable target-to-kidney ratio. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DFO is a suitable chelator for the radiolabeling of exendin-4 derivatives with gallium-68 for in vitro and preclinical in vivo studies. DFO performed better in vivo due to its significantly lower kidney accumulation (p < 0.0001). It was also found to be stable in vivo in mice, contrary to earlier reports. Based on our results, the DFO chelating system in combination with exendin-4 would be an interesting option for clinical imaging of insulinomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6522624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65226242019-06-05 Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 Kaeppeli, Simon A. M. Schibli, Roger Mindt, Thomas L. Behe, Martin EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem Research Article INTRODUCTION: Radiolabeled exendin-4 (Ex4) derivatives are used to target the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) for the clinical diagnosis of insulinomas, a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Gallium-68 is an ideal diagnostic nuclide for this application and a study evaluating an exendin-4-NODAGA conjugate is currently underway. However, in complexion with the chelator DFO, its in vivo stability has been a matter of dispute. The aim of this work was to directly compare [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD with [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: In our approach, we directly compared N′-[5-(acetyl-hydroxy-amino)pentyl]-N-[5-[3-(5-aminopentyl-hydroxy-carbamoyl)propanoylamino]pentyl]-N-hydroxy-butane diamide (desferriox-amine B, DFO) and 2-(4,7-bis (carboxymethyl)-1,4,7-triazonan-1-yl) pentanedioic acid (NODAGA) conjugated to exendin-4 in vitro and in vivo. We radiolabeled the peptides with gallium-68, followed by HPLC quality control. In vitro characterization was performed in CHL cells overexpressing the GLP-1R and in vivo studies were conducted with CD1 nu/nu mice carrying tumors derived from these cells. RESULTS: We found that both peptides could be radiolabeled with a molar activity of about 9.33 MBq/nmol without further purification. They internalized equally well into GLP-1R-expressing cells and their IC(50) was similar with 15.6 ± 7.8 nM and 18.4 ± 3.0 nM for [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD and [(nat)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO, respectively. In vivo, [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4NOD accumulated more in all tissue, while [(68)Ga]Ga-Ex4DFO exhibited a more favorable target-to-kidney ratio. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DFO is a suitable chelator for the radiolabeling of exendin-4 derivatives with gallium-68 for in vitro and preclinical in vivo studies. DFO performed better in vivo due to its significantly lower kidney accumulation (p < 0.0001). It was also found to be stable in vivo in mice, contrary to earlier reports. Based on our results, the DFO chelating system in combination with exendin-4 would be an interesting option for clinical imaging of insulinomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6522624/ /pubmed/31659487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaeppeli, Simon A. M. Schibli, Roger Mindt, Thomas L. Behe, Martin Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 |
title | Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 |
title_full | Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 |
title_short | Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 |
title_sort | comparison of desferrioxamine and nodaga for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6522624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-019-0060-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaeppelisimonam comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4 AT schibliroger comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4 AT mindtthomasl comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4 AT behemartin comparisonofdesferrioxamineandnodagaforthegallium68labelingofexendin4 |