Cargando…

No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Millions of animals are used for scientific purposes in the EU every year. The procedures they undergo often cause significant pain, suffering and distress. New gene editing technologies now potentially offer a new and feasible way to genetically modify research animals in order to r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devolder, Katrien, Eggel, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9040154
_version_ 1783419276219121664
author Devolder, Katrien
Eggel, Matthias
author_facet Devolder, Katrien
Eggel, Matthias
author_sort Devolder, Katrien
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Millions of animals are used for scientific purposes in the EU every year. The procedures they undergo often cause significant pain, suffering and distress. New gene editing technologies now potentially offer a new and feasible way to genetically modify research animals in order to reduce or eliminate their ability to feel pain and to suffer. In this paper, we discuss the ethical concerns this new technology and new possibility raise and evaluate the implications of such genetic modifications with regards to the legal regulations in animal research in Europe. ABSTRACT: Every year, around 12 million animals are used for the purpose of scientific research in the European Union alone. The procedures performed on them often cause significant pain and suffering. Despite regulations aimed at reducing this suffering, we can expect millions of research animals to continue to suffer in the near to mid-term future. Given this reality, we propose the use of gene editing to create research animals with a reduced capacity for suffering, in particular, from pain. We argue that our proposal would be in line with moral principles embedded in European regulations regarding animal research, and that it would facilitate compliance with these regulations. We also respond to the strongest argument against our proposal—the ‘no pain no gain’ argument.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6523187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65231872019-06-04 No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals Devolder, Katrien Eggel, Matthias Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Millions of animals are used for scientific purposes in the EU every year. The procedures they undergo often cause significant pain, suffering and distress. New gene editing technologies now potentially offer a new and feasible way to genetically modify research animals in order to reduce or eliminate their ability to feel pain and to suffer. In this paper, we discuss the ethical concerns this new technology and new possibility raise and evaluate the implications of such genetic modifications with regards to the legal regulations in animal research in Europe. ABSTRACT: Every year, around 12 million animals are used for the purpose of scientific research in the European Union alone. The procedures performed on them often cause significant pain and suffering. Despite regulations aimed at reducing this suffering, we can expect millions of research animals to continue to suffer in the near to mid-term future. Given this reality, we propose the use of gene editing to create research animals with a reduced capacity for suffering, in particular, from pain. We argue that our proposal would be in line with moral principles embedded in European regulations regarding animal research, and that it would facilitate compliance with these regulations. We also respond to the strongest argument against our proposal—the ‘no pain no gain’ argument. MDPI 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6523187/ /pubmed/30970545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9040154 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Devolder, Katrien
Eggel, Matthias
No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
title No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
title_full No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
title_fullStr No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
title_full_unstemmed No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
title_short No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
title_sort no pain, no gain? in defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9040154
work_keys_str_mv AT devolderkatrien nopainnogainindefenceofgeneticallydisenhancingmostresearchanimals
AT eggelmatthias nopainnogainindefenceofgeneticallydisenhancingmostresearchanimals