Cargando…

Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation

Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is F(ST). Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Berner, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31003563
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10040308
_version_ 1783419347519143936
author Berner, Daniel
author_facet Berner, Daniel
author_sort Berner, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is F(ST). Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical data, I here argue that F(ST) does not express the relationship to allele frequency differentiation between populations generally considered interpretable and desirable by researchers. In particular, F(ST) (1) has low sensitivity when population differentiation is weak, (2) is contingent on the minor allele frequency across the populations, (3) can be strongly affected by asymmetry in sample sizes, and (4) can differ greatly among the available estimators. Together, these features can complicate pattern recognition and interpretation in population genetic and genomic analysis, as illustrated by empirical examples, and overall compromise the comparability of population differentiation among markers and study systems. I argue that a simple differentiation metric displaying intuitive properties, the absolute allele frequency difference AFD, provides a valuable alternative to F(ST). I provide a general definition of AFD applicable to both bi- and multi-allelic markers and conclude by making recommendations on the sample sizes needed to achieve robust differentiation estimates using AFD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6523497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65234972019-06-03 Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation Berner, Daniel Genes (Basel) Opinion Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is F(ST). Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical data, I here argue that F(ST) does not express the relationship to allele frequency differentiation between populations generally considered interpretable and desirable by researchers. In particular, F(ST) (1) has low sensitivity when population differentiation is weak, (2) is contingent on the minor allele frequency across the populations, (3) can be strongly affected by asymmetry in sample sizes, and (4) can differ greatly among the available estimators. Together, these features can complicate pattern recognition and interpretation in population genetic and genomic analysis, as illustrated by empirical examples, and overall compromise the comparability of population differentiation among markers and study systems. I argue that a simple differentiation metric displaying intuitive properties, the absolute allele frequency difference AFD, provides a valuable alternative to F(ST). I provide a general definition of AFD applicable to both bi- and multi-allelic markers and conclude by making recommendations on the sample sizes needed to achieve robust differentiation estimates using AFD. MDPI 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6523497/ /pubmed/31003563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10040308 Text en © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion
Berner, Daniel
Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation
title Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation
title_full Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation
title_fullStr Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation
title_short Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation
title_sort allele frequency difference afd–an intuitive alternative to f(st) for quantifying genetic population differentiation
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31003563
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10040308
work_keys_str_mv AT bernerdaniel allelefrequencydifferenceafdanintuitivealternativetofstforquantifyinggeneticpopulationdifferentiation