Cargando…
Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation
Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is F(ST). Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31003563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10040308 |
_version_ | 1783419347519143936 |
---|---|
author | Berner, Daniel |
author_facet | Berner, Daniel |
author_sort | Berner, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is F(ST). Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical data, I here argue that F(ST) does not express the relationship to allele frequency differentiation between populations generally considered interpretable and desirable by researchers. In particular, F(ST) (1) has low sensitivity when population differentiation is weak, (2) is contingent on the minor allele frequency across the populations, (3) can be strongly affected by asymmetry in sample sizes, and (4) can differ greatly among the available estimators. Together, these features can complicate pattern recognition and interpretation in population genetic and genomic analysis, as illustrated by empirical examples, and overall compromise the comparability of population differentiation among markers and study systems. I argue that a simple differentiation metric displaying intuitive properties, the absolute allele frequency difference AFD, provides a valuable alternative to F(ST). I provide a general definition of AFD applicable to both bi- and multi-allelic markers and conclude by making recommendations on the sample sizes needed to achieve robust differentiation estimates using AFD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6523497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65234972019-06-03 Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation Berner, Daniel Genes (Basel) Opinion Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is F(ST). Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical data, I here argue that F(ST) does not express the relationship to allele frequency differentiation between populations generally considered interpretable and desirable by researchers. In particular, F(ST) (1) has low sensitivity when population differentiation is weak, (2) is contingent on the minor allele frequency across the populations, (3) can be strongly affected by asymmetry in sample sizes, and (4) can differ greatly among the available estimators. Together, these features can complicate pattern recognition and interpretation in population genetic and genomic analysis, as illustrated by empirical examples, and overall compromise the comparability of population differentiation among markers and study systems. I argue that a simple differentiation metric displaying intuitive properties, the absolute allele frequency difference AFD, provides a valuable alternative to F(ST). I provide a general definition of AFD applicable to both bi- and multi-allelic markers and conclude by making recommendations on the sample sizes needed to achieve robust differentiation estimates using AFD. MDPI 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6523497/ /pubmed/31003563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10040308 Text en © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Opinion Berner, Daniel Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation |
title | Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation |
title_full | Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation |
title_fullStr | Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation |
title_full_unstemmed | Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation |
title_short | Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to F(ST) for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation |
title_sort | allele frequency difference afd–an intuitive alternative to f(st) for quantifying genetic population differentiation |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31003563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10040308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernerdaniel allelefrequencydifferenceafdanintuitivealternativetofstforquantifyinggeneticpopulationdifferentiation |