Cargando…

The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Background: During admission for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients receive electrocardiograph (ECG) monitoring; for which reusable ECG cable and leads (rECG) are standard. Objective: Evaluate the cost effectiveness of a single-patient-use ECG cable and lead system (spECG). Methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saunders, Rhodri, Lankiewicz, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00061
_version_ 1783419353071353856
author Saunders, Rhodri
Lankiewicz, Julie
author_facet Saunders, Rhodri
Lankiewicz, Julie
author_sort Saunders, Rhodri
collection PubMed
description Background: During admission for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients receive electrocardiograph (ECG) monitoring; for which reusable ECG cable and leads (rECG) are standard. Objective: Evaluate the cost effectiveness of a single-patient-use ECG cable and lead system (spECG). Methods: Review of the Medicare 2011–2014 database followed by a cost-effectiveness model considering a Medicare facility transitioning from rECG ($9 per patient) to spECG ($15). In-hospital ECG monitoring was for ≤8 days. In the model, patients underwent CABG and recovered in the intensive care unit, before transfer to the general ward and discharge. Surgical site infection (SSI) resulted in increased length of stay, readmission, or outpatient care. Health outcomes impacted EQ-5D-measured quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Health and cost outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. All costs in 2016 USD. Significance (95% level) was assessed via 2,000 simulations. Results: In 2014, 5.49% of patients had an SSI by 90-days post-surgery, with spECG reducing the odds of an SSI (odds ratio: 0.74, 0.62–0.89). Mean 40-year, per-patient costs to Medicare were $65,497 with rECG and $65,048 with spECG. The $450 saving was significant, with a median (95% credible interval) reduction of $466 ($174 to $989). Cost drivers were days required to treat inpatient SSIs. QALYs increases with spECG were significant but minor (median increase 0.008). Medicare savings may total $40 million per year with use of spECG. Conclusions: Post-operative SSI is a concern for Medicare patients undergoing CABG, and use of spECG is likely to provide cost and patient benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6523521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65235212019-05-27 The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Saunders, Rhodri Lankiewicz, Julie Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: During admission for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients receive electrocardiograph (ECG) monitoring; for which reusable ECG cable and leads (rECG) are standard. Objective: Evaluate the cost effectiveness of a single-patient-use ECG cable and lead system (spECG). Methods: Review of the Medicare 2011–2014 database followed by a cost-effectiveness model considering a Medicare facility transitioning from rECG ($9 per patient) to spECG ($15). In-hospital ECG monitoring was for ≤8 days. In the model, patients underwent CABG and recovered in the intensive care unit, before transfer to the general ward and discharge. Surgical site infection (SSI) resulted in increased length of stay, readmission, or outpatient care. Health outcomes impacted EQ-5D-measured quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Health and cost outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. All costs in 2016 USD. Significance (95% level) was assessed via 2,000 simulations. Results: In 2014, 5.49% of patients had an SSI by 90-days post-surgery, with spECG reducing the odds of an SSI (odds ratio: 0.74, 0.62–0.89). Mean 40-year, per-patient costs to Medicare were $65,497 with rECG and $65,048 with spECG. The $450 saving was significant, with a median (95% credible interval) reduction of $466 ($174 to $989). Cost drivers were days required to treat inpatient SSIs. QALYs increases with spECG were significant but minor (median increase 0.008). Medicare savings may total $40 million per year with use of spECG. Conclusions: Post-operative SSI is a concern for Medicare patients undergoing CABG, and use of spECG is likely to provide cost and patient benefits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6523521/ /pubmed/31134212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00061 Text en Copyright © 2019 Saunders and Lankiewicz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Saunders, Rhodri
Lankiewicz, Julie
The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
title The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
title_full The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
title_fullStr The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
title_short The Cost Effectiveness of Single-Patient-Use Electrocardiograph Cable and Lead Systems in Monitoring for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
title_sort cost effectiveness of single-patient-use electrocardiograph cable and lead systems in monitoring for coronary artery bypass graft surgery
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00061
work_keys_str_mv AT saundersrhodri thecosteffectivenessofsinglepatientuseelectrocardiographcableandleadsystemsinmonitoringforcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery
AT lankiewiczjulie thecosteffectivenessofsinglepatientuseelectrocardiographcableandleadsystemsinmonitoringforcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery
AT saundersrhodri costeffectivenessofsinglepatientuseelectrocardiographcableandleadsystemsinmonitoringforcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery
AT lankiewiczjulie costeffectivenessofsinglepatientuseelectrocardiographcableandleadsystemsinmonitoringforcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery