Cargando…
Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
Since the late 1990s, perioperative care through the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]) program has spread. ERAS protocols aim to reduce surgical complications, improving postoperative outcomes and thereby saving resources by addres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12232 |
_version_ | 1783419489460682752 |
---|---|
author | Yamagata, Yukinori Yoshikawa, Takaki Yura, Masahiro Otsuki, Sho Morita, Shinji Katai, Hitoshi Nishida, Toshiro |
author_facet | Yamagata, Yukinori Yoshikawa, Takaki Yura, Masahiro Otsuki, Sho Morita, Shinji Katai, Hitoshi Nishida, Toshiro |
author_sort | Yamagata, Yukinori |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the late 1990s, perioperative care through the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]) program has spread. ERAS protocols aim to reduce surgical complications, improving postoperative outcomes and thereby saving resources by addressing various clinical elements through a multidisciplinary approach or based on evidence. In the field of gastric cancer, the philosophy of ERAS has gradually become accepted and, in 2014, consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy were published. These guidelines consist of “procedure‐specific” guidelines and “general (not procedure‐specific) enhanced recovery items.” In this review, we focused on the procedure‐specific guidelines and tried to update the contents of every element of the procedure‐specific guidelines. The procedure‐specific guidelines consist of the following eight elements: “Preoperative nutrition,” “Preoperative oral pharmaconutrition,” “Access (of gastrectomy),” “Wound catheters and transversus abdominis plane block,” “Nasogastric/Nasojejunal decompression,” “Perianastomotic drains,” “Early postoperative diet and artificial nutrition,” and “Audit.” On reviewing papers supporting these elements, it was reconfirmed that the recommendations of the guidelines are pertinent and valid. Four meta‐analyses concerning the evaluation of ERAS protocols for gastric cancer were included in this review. Every study showed that the ERAS protocol reduced the cost and duration of hospital stay without increasing surgical complication rates, suggesting that ERAS is effective for gastric cancer surgery. However, it cannot be said that ERAS has achieved full penetration in Japan because most evidence is established in Western countries. Future studies must focus on developing a new ERAS protocols appropriate to Japanese conditions of gastric cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6524106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65241062019-05-24 Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery Yamagata, Yukinori Yoshikawa, Takaki Yura, Masahiro Otsuki, Sho Morita, Shinji Katai, Hitoshi Nishida, Toshiro Ann Gastroenterol Surg Review Articles Since the late 1990s, perioperative care through the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]) program has spread. ERAS protocols aim to reduce surgical complications, improving postoperative outcomes and thereby saving resources by addressing various clinical elements through a multidisciplinary approach or based on evidence. In the field of gastric cancer, the philosophy of ERAS has gradually become accepted and, in 2014, consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy were published. These guidelines consist of “procedure‐specific” guidelines and “general (not procedure‐specific) enhanced recovery items.” In this review, we focused on the procedure‐specific guidelines and tried to update the contents of every element of the procedure‐specific guidelines. The procedure‐specific guidelines consist of the following eight elements: “Preoperative nutrition,” “Preoperative oral pharmaconutrition,” “Access (of gastrectomy),” “Wound catheters and transversus abdominis plane block,” “Nasogastric/Nasojejunal decompression,” “Perianastomotic drains,” “Early postoperative diet and artificial nutrition,” and “Audit.” On reviewing papers supporting these elements, it was reconfirmed that the recommendations of the guidelines are pertinent and valid. Four meta‐analyses concerning the evaluation of ERAS protocols for gastric cancer were included in this review. Every study showed that the ERAS protocol reduced the cost and duration of hospital stay without increasing surgical complication rates, suggesting that ERAS is effective for gastric cancer surgery. However, it cannot be said that ERAS has achieved full penetration in Japan because most evidence is established in Western countries. Future studies must focus on developing a new ERAS protocols appropriate to Japanese conditions of gastric cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6524106/ /pubmed/31131351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12232 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Yamagata, Yukinori Yoshikawa, Takaki Yura, Masahiro Otsuki, Sho Morita, Shinji Katai, Hitoshi Nishida, Toshiro Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery |
title | Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery |
title_full | Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery |
title_fullStr | Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery |
title_short | Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery |
title_sort | current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamagatayukinori currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery AT yoshikawatakaki currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery AT yuramasahiro currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery AT otsukisho currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery AT moritashinji currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery AT kataihitoshi currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery AT nishidatoshiro currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery |