Cargando…

Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery

Since the late 1990s, perioperative care through the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]) program has spread. ERAS protocols aim to reduce surgical complications, improving postoperative outcomes and thereby saving resources by addres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamagata, Yukinori, Yoshikawa, Takaki, Yura, Masahiro, Otsuki, Sho, Morita, Shinji, Katai, Hitoshi, Nishida, Toshiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12232
_version_ 1783419489460682752
author Yamagata, Yukinori
Yoshikawa, Takaki
Yura, Masahiro
Otsuki, Sho
Morita, Shinji
Katai, Hitoshi
Nishida, Toshiro
author_facet Yamagata, Yukinori
Yoshikawa, Takaki
Yura, Masahiro
Otsuki, Sho
Morita, Shinji
Katai, Hitoshi
Nishida, Toshiro
author_sort Yamagata, Yukinori
collection PubMed
description Since the late 1990s, perioperative care through the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]) program has spread. ERAS protocols aim to reduce surgical complications, improving postoperative outcomes and thereby saving resources by addressing various clinical elements through a multidisciplinary approach or based on evidence. In the field of gastric cancer, the philosophy of ERAS has gradually become accepted and, in 2014, consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy were published. These guidelines consist of “procedure‐specific” guidelines and “general (not procedure‐specific) enhanced recovery items.” In this review, we focused on the procedure‐specific guidelines and tried to update the contents of every element of the procedure‐specific guidelines. The procedure‐specific guidelines consist of the following eight elements: “Preoperative nutrition,” “Preoperative oral pharmaconutrition,” “Access (of gastrectomy),” “Wound catheters and transversus abdominis plane block,” “Nasogastric/Nasojejunal decompression,” “Perianastomotic drains,” “Early postoperative diet and artificial nutrition,” and “Audit.” On reviewing papers supporting these elements, it was reconfirmed that the recommendations of the guidelines are pertinent and valid. Four meta‐analyses concerning the evaluation of ERAS protocols for gastric cancer were included in this review. Every study showed that the ERAS protocol reduced the cost and duration of hospital stay without increasing surgical complication rates, suggesting that ERAS is effective for gastric cancer surgery. However, it cannot be said that ERAS has achieved full penetration in Japan because most evidence is established in Western countries. Future studies must focus on developing a new ERAS protocols appropriate to Japanese conditions of gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65241062019-05-24 Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery Yamagata, Yukinori Yoshikawa, Takaki Yura, Masahiro Otsuki, Sho Morita, Shinji Katai, Hitoshi Nishida, Toshiro Ann Gastroenterol Surg Review Articles Since the late 1990s, perioperative care through the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]) program has spread. ERAS protocols aim to reduce surgical complications, improving postoperative outcomes and thereby saving resources by addressing various clinical elements through a multidisciplinary approach or based on evidence. In the field of gastric cancer, the philosophy of ERAS has gradually become accepted and, in 2014, consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy were published. These guidelines consist of “procedure‐specific” guidelines and “general (not procedure‐specific) enhanced recovery items.” In this review, we focused on the procedure‐specific guidelines and tried to update the contents of every element of the procedure‐specific guidelines. The procedure‐specific guidelines consist of the following eight elements: “Preoperative nutrition,” “Preoperative oral pharmaconutrition,” “Access (of gastrectomy),” “Wound catheters and transversus abdominis plane block,” “Nasogastric/Nasojejunal decompression,” “Perianastomotic drains,” “Early postoperative diet and artificial nutrition,” and “Audit.” On reviewing papers supporting these elements, it was reconfirmed that the recommendations of the guidelines are pertinent and valid. Four meta‐analyses concerning the evaluation of ERAS protocols for gastric cancer were included in this review. Every study showed that the ERAS protocol reduced the cost and duration of hospital stay without increasing surgical complication rates, suggesting that ERAS is effective for gastric cancer surgery. However, it cannot be said that ERAS has achieved full penetration in Japan because most evidence is established in Western countries. Future studies must focus on developing a new ERAS protocols appropriate to Japanese conditions of gastric cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6524106/ /pubmed/31131351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12232 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Yamagata, Yukinori
Yoshikawa, Takaki
Yura, Masahiro
Otsuki, Sho
Morita, Shinji
Katai, Hitoshi
Nishida, Toshiro
Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
title Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
title_full Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
title_fullStr Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
title_full_unstemmed Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
title_short Current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
title_sort current status of the “enhanced recovery after surgery” program in gastric cancer surgery
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12232
work_keys_str_mv AT yamagatayukinori currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery
AT yoshikawatakaki currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery
AT yuramasahiro currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery
AT otsukisho currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery
AT moritashinji currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery
AT kataihitoshi currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery
AT nishidatoshiro currentstatusoftheenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingastriccancersurgery