Cargando…

Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study

AIM: Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed to inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sueda, Toshinori, Murata, Kohei, Takeda, Takashi, Kagawa, Yoshinori, Hasegawa, Junichi, Komori, Takamichi, Noura, Shingo, Ikeda, Kimimasa, Tsujie, Masaki, Ohue, Masayuki, Ota, Hirofumi, Ikenaga, Masakazu, Hata, Taishi, Matsuda, Chu, Mizushima, Tsunekazu, Yamamoto, Hirofumi, Sekimoto, Mitsugu, Nezu, Riichiro, Mori, Masaki, Doki, Yuichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241
_version_ 1783419492115677184
author Sueda, Toshinori
Murata, Kohei
Takeda, Takashi
Kagawa, Yoshinori
Hasegawa, Junichi
Komori, Takamichi
Noura, Shingo
Ikeda, Kimimasa
Tsujie, Masaki
Ohue, Masayuki
Ota, Hirofumi
Ikenaga, Masakazu
Hata, Taishi
Matsuda, Chu
Mizushima, Tsunekazu
Yamamoto, Hirofumi
Sekimoto, Mitsugu
Nezu, Riichiro
Mori, Masaki
Doki, Yuichiro
author_facet Sueda, Toshinori
Murata, Kohei
Takeda, Takashi
Kagawa, Yoshinori
Hasegawa, Junichi
Komori, Takamichi
Noura, Shingo
Ikeda, Kimimasa
Tsujie, Masaki
Ohue, Masayuki
Ota, Hirofumi
Ikenaga, Masakazu
Hata, Taishi
Matsuda, Chu
Mizushima, Tsunekazu
Yamamoto, Hirofumi
Sekimoto, Mitsugu
Nezu, Riichiro
Mori, Masaki
Doki, Yuichiro
author_sort Sueda, Toshinori
collection PubMed
description AIM: Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the histological types and stages of appendiceal neoplasms, and to evaluate the prognostic impacts of these factors in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas and non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Patients with appendiceal tumors diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from the databases of 19 institutions in the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Group. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients with appendiceal tumors were identified, of whom 130 had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinomas, including 57 with mucinous adenocarcinomas and 73 with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Five‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.5% for mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 49.0% for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. OS was significantly shorter among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Among patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 53.6% for stage 0/I, 82.6% for II/III, and 48.4% for IV. Among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 90.9% for stage 0/I, 68.8% for II/III, and 7.1% for IV. Analysis of patients with stage IV disease revealed significantly shorter OS among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION: Our present findings showed a better prognosis in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. In this setting, Union for International Cancer Control staging was associated with prognosis for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, but not for mucinous adenocarcinomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65241182019-05-24 Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study Sueda, Toshinori Murata, Kohei Takeda, Takashi Kagawa, Yoshinori Hasegawa, Junichi Komori, Takamichi Noura, Shingo Ikeda, Kimimasa Tsujie, Masaki Ohue, Masayuki Ota, Hirofumi Ikenaga, Masakazu Hata, Taishi Matsuda, Chu Mizushima, Tsunekazu Yamamoto, Hirofumi Sekimoto, Mitsugu Nezu, Riichiro Mori, Masaki Doki, Yuichiro Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the histological types and stages of appendiceal neoplasms, and to evaluate the prognostic impacts of these factors in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas and non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Patients with appendiceal tumors diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from the databases of 19 institutions in the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Group. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients with appendiceal tumors were identified, of whom 130 had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinomas, including 57 with mucinous adenocarcinomas and 73 with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Five‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.5% for mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 49.0% for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. OS was significantly shorter among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Among patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 53.6% for stage 0/I, 82.6% for II/III, and 48.4% for IV. Among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 90.9% for stage 0/I, 68.8% for II/III, and 7.1% for IV. Analysis of patients with stage IV disease revealed significantly shorter OS among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION: Our present findings showed a better prognosis in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. In this setting, Union for International Cancer Control staging was associated with prognosis for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, but not for mucinous adenocarcinomas. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6524118/ /pubmed/31131358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sueda, Toshinori
Murata, Kohei
Takeda, Takashi
Kagawa, Yoshinori
Hasegawa, Junichi
Komori, Takamichi
Noura, Shingo
Ikeda, Kimimasa
Tsujie, Masaki
Ohue, Masayuki
Ota, Hirofumi
Ikenaga, Masakazu
Hata, Taishi
Matsuda, Chu
Mizushima, Tsunekazu
Yamamoto, Hirofumi
Sekimoto, Mitsugu
Nezu, Riichiro
Mori, Masaki
Doki, Yuichiro
Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_full Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_fullStr Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_short Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_sort survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241
work_keys_str_mv AT suedatoshinori survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT muratakohei survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT takedatakashi survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT kagawayoshinori survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT hasegawajunichi survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT komoritakamichi survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT nourashingo survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT ikedakimimasa survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT tsujiemasaki survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT ohuemasayuki survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT otahirofumi survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT ikenagamasakazu survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT hatataishi survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT matsudachu survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT mizushimatsunekazu survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT yamamotohirofumi survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT sekimotomitsugu survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT nezuriichiro survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT morimasaki survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT dokiyuichiro survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy