Cargando…

Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective

Organ preservation after a clinical complete response to radiochemotherapy is currently one of the most discussed topics in the management of rectal cancer. However, the patients' perspective has only been poorly studied so far. In this multicenter study, we examined 49 patients with locally ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gani, Cihan, Gani, Nina, Zschaeck, Sebastian, Eberle, Fabian, Schaeffeler, Norbert, Hehr, Thomas, Berger, Bernhard, Fischer, Stefan Georg, Claßen, Johannes, Zipfel, Stephan, Rödel, Claus, Teufel, Martin, Zips, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00318
_version_ 1783419496400158720
author Gani, Cihan
Gani, Nina
Zschaeck, Sebastian
Eberle, Fabian
Schaeffeler, Norbert
Hehr, Thomas
Berger, Bernhard
Fischer, Stefan Georg
Claßen, Johannes
Zipfel, Stephan
Rödel, Claus
Teufel, Martin
Zips, Daniel
author_facet Gani, Cihan
Gani, Nina
Zschaeck, Sebastian
Eberle, Fabian
Schaeffeler, Norbert
Hehr, Thomas
Berger, Bernhard
Fischer, Stefan Georg
Claßen, Johannes
Zipfel, Stephan
Rödel, Claus
Teufel, Martin
Zips, Daniel
author_sort Gani, Cihan
collection PubMed
description Organ preservation after a clinical complete response to radiochemotherapy is currently one of the most discussed topics in the management of rectal cancer. However, the patients' perspective has only been poorly studied so far. In this multicenter study, we examined 49 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The willingness to participate in an organ preservation study and the acceptance of the associated aspects such as intensified radiochemotherapy protocols, the need for close follow-up examinations and local regrowth rates were assessed. Attitudes were correlated with baseline quality of life parameters and psychological scales for “fear of progression”, “locus of control”, “depression”, and the “willingness to take risks”. A total of 83% of patients would consider the deferral of surgery in case of a clinical complete response (cCR). Three monthly follow-up studies and a 25% local regrowth rate are considered acceptable by 95% and 94% respectively. While 41% would be willing to exchange cure rates for a non-operative treatment strategy, a potentially more toxic radiochemotherapy in order to increase the probability of a cCR was the aspect with the lowest acceptance (55%). Psychological factors, in particular “locus of control” and “willingness to take risks”, influenced patient preferences regarding most of the assessed parameters. While in general a broad acceptance of an organ-preserving treatment can be expected, patient preferences and concerns regarding different aspects of this strategy vary widely and require specific consideration during shared decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65241502019-05-27 Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective Gani, Cihan Gani, Nina Zschaeck, Sebastian Eberle, Fabian Schaeffeler, Norbert Hehr, Thomas Berger, Bernhard Fischer, Stefan Georg Claßen, Johannes Zipfel, Stephan Rödel, Claus Teufel, Martin Zips, Daniel Front Oncol Oncology Organ preservation after a clinical complete response to radiochemotherapy is currently one of the most discussed topics in the management of rectal cancer. However, the patients' perspective has only been poorly studied so far. In this multicenter study, we examined 49 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The willingness to participate in an organ preservation study and the acceptance of the associated aspects such as intensified radiochemotherapy protocols, the need for close follow-up examinations and local regrowth rates were assessed. Attitudes were correlated with baseline quality of life parameters and psychological scales for “fear of progression”, “locus of control”, “depression”, and the “willingness to take risks”. A total of 83% of patients would consider the deferral of surgery in case of a clinical complete response (cCR). Three monthly follow-up studies and a 25% local regrowth rate are considered acceptable by 95% and 94% respectively. While 41% would be willing to exchange cure rates for a non-operative treatment strategy, a potentially more toxic radiochemotherapy in order to increase the probability of a cCR was the aspect with the lowest acceptance (55%). Psychological factors, in particular “locus of control” and “willingness to take risks”, influenced patient preferences regarding most of the assessed parameters. While in general a broad acceptance of an organ-preserving treatment can be expected, patient preferences and concerns regarding different aspects of this strategy vary widely and require specific consideration during shared decision making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6524150/ /pubmed/31134146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00318 Text en Copyright © 2019 Gani, Gani, Zschaeck, Eberle, Schaeffeler, Hehr, Berger, Fischer, Claßen, Zipfel, Rödel, Teufel and Zips. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Gani, Cihan
Gani, Nina
Zschaeck, Sebastian
Eberle, Fabian
Schaeffeler, Norbert
Hehr, Thomas
Berger, Bernhard
Fischer, Stefan Georg
Claßen, Johannes
Zipfel, Stephan
Rödel, Claus
Teufel, Martin
Zips, Daniel
Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective
title Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective
title_full Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective
title_fullStr Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective
title_short Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective
title_sort organ preservation in rectal cancer: the patients' perspective
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00318
work_keys_str_mv AT ganicihan organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT ganinina organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT zschaecksebastian organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT eberlefabian organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT schaeffelernorbert organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT hehrthomas organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT bergerbernhard organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT fischerstefangeorg organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT claßenjohannes organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT zipfelstephan organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT rodelclaus organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT teufelmartin organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective
AT zipsdaniel organpreservationinrectalcancerthepatientsperspective