Cargando…

Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH), and urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (uHMG) are widely used for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). This study compares the effects of rFSH only, rLH + rFSH, and HMG + rFSH administration on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tayyar, Ahter Tanay, Kahraman, Semra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110533
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.72408
_version_ 1783419501681836032
author Tayyar, Ahter Tanay
Kahraman, Semra
author_facet Tayyar, Ahter Tanay
Kahraman, Semra
author_sort Tayyar, Ahter Tanay
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH), and urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (uHMG) are widely used for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). This study compares the effects of rFSH only, rLH + rFSH, and HMG + rFSH administration on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for patients in three different yearly follow-up cycles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted from January 2001 to June 2016 at Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Artificial Reproductive Technology Center. From a total of 27,024 IVF cycles in women aged 18 to 45 years (17,536 rFSH only; 2147 rLH + rFSH; 7341 HMG + rFSH), the results of 2,147 cycles receiving a treatment of rLH + rFSH over the 3-year evaluation and 2,081 total cycles in which rLH + rFSH was used at least once were evaluated, and different gonadotropin combinations were compared. RESULTS: The age and body mass index of the patients in the uHMG + rFSH group were found to be significantly higher than those of the patients in the rLH + rFSH and rFSH only groups (p < 0.001). The total gonadotropin (GND) dosage of the patients in the rLH + rFSH group was found to be significantly lower than that of the HMG + rFSH group (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, while the highest clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate was observed in the rLH + rFSH group at age 35–39 years. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant luteinizing hormone administration may increase the number of clinical pregnancies for patients aged 35–39 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65241762019-05-20 Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only Tayyar, Ahter Tanay Kahraman, Semra Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH), and urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (uHMG) are widely used for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). This study compares the effects of rFSH only, rLH + rFSH, and HMG + rFSH administration on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for patients in three different yearly follow-up cycles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted from January 2001 to June 2016 at Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Artificial Reproductive Technology Center. From a total of 27,024 IVF cycles in women aged 18 to 45 years (17,536 rFSH only; 2147 rLH + rFSH; 7341 HMG + rFSH), the results of 2,147 cycles receiving a treatment of rLH + rFSH over the 3-year evaluation and 2,081 total cycles in which rLH + rFSH was used at least once were evaluated, and different gonadotropin combinations were compared. RESULTS: The age and body mass index of the patients in the uHMG + rFSH group were found to be significantly higher than those of the patients in the rLH + rFSH and rFSH only groups (p < 0.001). The total gonadotropin (GND) dosage of the patients in the rLH + rFSH group was found to be significantly lower than that of the HMG + rFSH group (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, while the highest clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate was observed in the rLH + rFSH group at age 35–39 years. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant luteinizing hormone administration may increase the number of clinical pregnancies for patients aged 35–39 years. Termedia Publishing House 2018-01-08 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6524176/ /pubmed/31110533 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.72408 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Tayyar, Ahter Tanay
Kahraman, Semra
Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only
title Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only
title_full Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only
title_fullStr Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only
title_short Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only
title_sort comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rfsh), human menopausal gonadotropin + rfsh and rfsh only
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110533
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.72408
work_keys_str_mv AT tayyarahtertanay comparisonbetweencyclesofthesamepatientswhenusingrecombinantluteinizinghormonerecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormonerfshhumanmenopausalgonadotropinrfshandrfshonly
AT kahramansemra comparisonbetweencyclesofthesamepatientswhenusingrecombinantluteinizinghormonerecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormonerfshhumanmenopausalgonadotropinrfshandrfshonly