Cargando…

Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery

BACKGROUND: Flow diverter devices are increasingly used for endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms with flow diverter devices also includes coverage of the ophthalmic artery but may result in complications. It is unclear, however, wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xinzhi, Tian, Zhongbin, Liu, Jian, Li, Wenqiang, Chen, Junfan, Zhou, Yangyang, Yang, Xinjian, Mu, Shiqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31096981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1913-4
_version_ 1783419535211102208
author Wu, Xinzhi
Tian, Zhongbin
Liu, Jian
Li, Wenqiang
Chen, Junfan
Zhou, Yangyang
Yang, Xinjian
Mu, Shiqing
author_facet Wu, Xinzhi
Tian, Zhongbin
Liu, Jian
Li, Wenqiang
Chen, Junfan
Zhou, Yangyang
Yang, Xinjian
Mu, Shiqing
author_sort Wu, Xinzhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flow diverter devices are increasingly used for endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms with flow diverter devices also includes coverage of the ophthalmic artery but may result in complications. It is unclear, however, whether these devices mechanically block blood flow in the ophthalmic artery. Also unclear is the relationship between deployment of a flow diverter device and post-treatment occlusion. We studied hemodynamic changes in the ophthalmic artery after deployment of a flow diverter device to determine the relationship between those changes and post-stent occlusion of the artery. METHODS: We analyzed hemodynamic modifications in the ophthalmic artery in 21 patients (19 women, 2 men; mean age 53.43 ± 7.32 years) treated by a single pipeline embolization device. Patient-specific geometries were determined from three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography and the stenting process was simulated. Computational fluid dynamics technology was used to analyze the change in ophthalmic artery hemodynamics. We compared pre-treatment and post-treatment flow velocity of the ophthalmic artery. RESULTS: Among the 21 patients with aneurysms located in the ophthalmic segment, no ophthalmic artery occlusion was found during immediate or follow-up angiography. Post-stent flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery decreased from 0.35 ± 0.19 to 0.33 ± 0.20 m/s, with the difference not being statistically significant (P = 0.106). CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significant change in ophthalmic artery blood flow after pipeline embolization device deployment. Hence, post-stent occlusion of the ophthalmic artery could not be explained by reduced blood flow. Delayed thrombosis and neointimal formation maybe the keys to ophthalmic artery occlusion and need further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-019-1913-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65243192019-05-24 Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery Wu, Xinzhi Tian, Zhongbin Liu, Jian Li, Wenqiang Chen, Junfan Zhou, Yangyang Yang, Xinjian Mu, Shiqing J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Flow diverter devices are increasingly used for endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms with flow diverter devices also includes coverage of the ophthalmic artery but may result in complications. It is unclear, however, whether these devices mechanically block blood flow in the ophthalmic artery. Also unclear is the relationship between deployment of a flow diverter device and post-treatment occlusion. We studied hemodynamic changes in the ophthalmic artery after deployment of a flow diverter device to determine the relationship between those changes and post-stent occlusion of the artery. METHODS: We analyzed hemodynamic modifications in the ophthalmic artery in 21 patients (19 women, 2 men; mean age 53.43 ± 7.32 years) treated by a single pipeline embolization device. Patient-specific geometries were determined from three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography and the stenting process was simulated. Computational fluid dynamics technology was used to analyze the change in ophthalmic artery hemodynamics. We compared pre-treatment and post-treatment flow velocity of the ophthalmic artery. RESULTS: Among the 21 patients with aneurysms located in the ophthalmic segment, no ophthalmic artery occlusion was found during immediate or follow-up angiography. Post-stent flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery decreased from 0.35 ± 0.19 to 0.33 ± 0.20 m/s, with the difference not being statistically significant (P = 0.106). CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significant change in ophthalmic artery blood flow after pipeline embolization device deployment. Hence, post-stent occlusion of the ophthalmic artery could not be explained by reduced blood flow. Delayed thrombosis and neointimal formation maybe the keys to ophthalmic artery occlusion and need further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-019-1913-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6524319/ /pubmed/31096981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1913-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Xinzhi
Tian, Zhongbin
Liu, Jian
Li, Wenqiang
Chen, Junfan
Zhou, Yangyang
Yang, Xinjian
Mu, Shiqing
Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery
title Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery
title_full Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery
title_fullStr Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery
title_short Hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery
title_sort hemodynamic impacts of flow diverter devices on the ophthalmic artery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31096981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1913-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxinzhi hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery
AT tianzhongbin hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery
AT liujian hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery
AT liwenqiang hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery
AT chenjunfan hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery
AT zhouyangyang hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery
AT yangxinjian hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery
AT mushiqing hemodynamicimpactsofflowdiverterdevicesontheophthalmicartery