Cargando…
Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study
BACKGROUND: Fluid challenge (FC) is one of the most common practices in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The present study aimed to evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment of the response to FC at the end of the infusion or 20 min later could affect the results of the FC. METHODS: This is a prospect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z |
_version_ | 1783419536665477120 |
---|---|
author | Roger, Claire Zieleskiewicz, Laurent Demattei, Christophe Lakhal, Karim Piton, Gael Louart, Benjamin Constantin, Jean-Michel Chabanne, Russell Faure, Jean-Sébastien Mahjoub, Yazine Desmeulles, Isabelle Quintard, Hervé Lefrant, Jean-Yves Muller, Laurent |
author_facet | Roger, Claire Zieleskiewicz, Laurent Demattei, Christophe Lakhal, Karim Piton, Gael Louart, Benjamin Constantin, Jean-Michel Chabanne, Russell Faure, Jean-Sébastien Mahjoub, Yazine Desmeulles, Isabelle Quintard, Hervé Lefrant, Jean-Yves Muller, Laurent |
author_sort | Roger, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fluid challenge (FC) is one of the most common practices in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The present study aimed to evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment of the response to FC at the end of the infusion or 20 min later could affect the results of the FC. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study including all ICU patients in septic shock requiring a FC of 500 mL crystalloids over 10 min. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a > 15% increase in stroke volume (SV) assessed by velocity-time integral (VTI) measurements at baseline (T(0)), at the end of FC (T(10)), then 10 (T(20)) and 20 min (T(30)) after the end of FC. RESULTS: From May 20, 2014, to January 7, 2016, a total of 143 patients were enrolled in 11 French ICUs (mean age 64 ± 14 years, median IGS II 53 [43–63], median SOFA score 10 [8–12]). Among the 76/143 (53%) patient responders to FC at T(10), 37 patients were transient responders (TR), i.e., became non-responders (NR) at T(30) (49%, 95%CI = [37–60]), and 39 (51%, 95%CI = [38–62]) patients were persistent responders (PR), i.e., remained responders at T(30). Among the 67 NR at T(10), 4 became responders at T30, (6%, 95%CI = [1.9–15.3]). In the subgroup analysis, no statistical difference in hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters was found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 51.3% of initial responders have a persistent response to fluid 30 min after the beginning of fluid infusion and only 41.3% have a transient response highlighting that fluid responsiveness is time dependent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02116413. Registered on April 16, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6524325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65243252019-05-24 Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study Roger, Claire Zieleskiewicz, Laurent Demattei, Christophe Lakhal, Karim Piton, Gael Louart, Benjamin Constantin, Jean-Michel Chabanne, Russell Faure, Jean-Sébastien Mahjoub, Yazine Desmeulles, Isabelle Quintard, Hervé Lefrant, Jean-Yves Muller, Laurent Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Fluid challenge (FC) is one of the most common practices in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The present study aimed to evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment of the response to FC at the end of the infusion or 20 min later could affect the results of the FC. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study including all ICU patients in septic shock requiring a FC of 500 mL crystalloids over 10 min. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a > 15% increase in stroke volume (SV) assessed by velocity-time integral (VTI) measurements at baseline (T(0)), at the end of FC (T(10)), then 10 (T(20)) and 20 min (T(30)) after the end of FC. RESULTS: From May 20, 2014, to January 7, 2016, a total of 143 patients were enrolled in 11 French ICUs (mean age 64 ± 14 years, median IGS II 53 [43–63], median SOFA score 10 [8–12]). Among the 76/143 (53%) patient responders to FC at T(10), 37 patients were transient responders (TR), i.e., became non-responders (NR) at T(30) (49%, 95%CI = [37–60]), and 39 (51%, 95%CI = [38–62]) patients were persistent responders (PR), i.e., remained responders at T(30). Among the 67 NR at T(10), 4 became responders at T30, (6%, 95%CI = [1.9–15.3]). In the subgroup analysis, no statistical difference in hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters was found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 51.3% of initial responders have a persistent response to fluid 30 min after the beginning of fluid infusion and only 41.3% have a transient response highlighting that fluid responsiveness is time dependent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02116413. Registered on April 16, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6524325/ /pubmed/31097012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Roger, Claire Zieleskiewicz, Laurent Demattei, Christophe Lakhal, Karim Piton, Gael Louart, Benjamin Constantin, Jean-Michel Chabanne, Russell Faure, Jean-Sébastien Mahjoub, Yazine Desmeulles, Isabelle Quintard, Hervé Lefrant, Jean-Yves Muller, Laurent Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study |
title | Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study |
title_full | Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study |
title_fullStr | Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study |
title_short | Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study |
title_sort | time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (fcrev) study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rogerclaire timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT zieleskiewiczlaurent timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT dematteichristophe timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT lakhalkarim timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT pitongael timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT louartbenjamin timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT constantinjeanmichel timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT chabannerussell timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT faurejeansebastien timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT mahjoubyazine timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT desmeullesisabelle timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT quintardherve timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT lefrantjeanyves timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT mullerlaurent timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy AT timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy |