Cargando…

Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study

BACKGROUND: Fluid challenge (FC) is one of the most common practices in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The present study aimed to evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment of the response to FC at the end of the infusion or 20 min later could affect the results of the FC. METHODS: This is a prospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roger, Claire, Zieleskiewicz, Laurent, Demattei, Christophe, Lakhal, Karim, Piton, Gael, Louart, Benjamin, Constantin, Jean-Michel, Chabanne, Russell, Faure, Jean-Sébastien, Mahjoub, Yazine, Desmeulles, Isabelle, Quintard, Hervé, Lefrant, Jean-Yves, Muller, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z
_version_ 1783419536665477120
author Roger, Claire
Zieleskiewicz, Laurent
Demattei, Christophe
Lakhal, Karim
Piton, Gael
Louart, Benjamin
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Chabanne, Russell
Faure, Jean-Sébastien
Mahjoub, Yazine
Desmeulles, Isabelle
Quintard, Hervé
Lefrant, Jean-Yves
Muller, Laurent
author_facet Roger, Claire
Zieleskiewicz, Laurent
Demattei, Christophe
Lakhal, Karim
Piton, Gael
Louart, Benjamin
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Chabanne, Russell
Faure, Jean-Sébastien
Mahjoub, Yazine
Desmeulles, Isabelle
Quintard, Hervé
Lefrant, Jean-Yves
Muller, Laurent
author_sort Roger, Claire
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fluid challenge (FC) is one of the most common practices in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The present study aimed to evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment of the response to FC at the end of the infusion or 20 min later could affect the results of the FC. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study including all ICU patients in septic shock requiring a FC of 500 mL crystalloids over 10 min. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a > 15% increase in stroke volume (SV) assessed by velocity-time integral (VTI) measurements at baseline (T(0)), at the end of FC (T(10)), then 10 (T(20)) and 20 min (T(30)) after the end of FC. RESULTS: From May 20, 2014, to January 7, 2016, a total of 143 patients were enrolled in 11 French ICUs (mean age 64 ± 14 years, median IGS II 53 [43–63], median SOFA score 10 [8–12]). Among the 76/143 (53%) patient responders to FC at T(10), 37 patients were transient responders (TR), i.e., became non-responders (NR) at T(30) (49%, 95%CI = [37–60]), and 39 (51%, 95%CI = [38–62]) patients were persistent responders (PR), i.e., remained responders at T(30). Among the 67 NR at T(10), 4 became responders at T30, (6%, 95%CI = [1.9–15.3]). In the subgroup analysis, no statistical difference in hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters was found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 51.3% of initial responders have a persistent response to fluid 30 min after the beginning of fluid infusion and only 41.3% have a transient response highlighting that fluid responsiveness is time dependent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02116413. Registered on April 16, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65243252019-05-24 Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study Roger, Claire Zieleskiewicz, Laurent Demattei, Christophe Lakhal, Karim Piton, Gael Louart, Benjamin Constantin, Jean-Michel Chabanne, Russell Faure, Jean-Sébastien Mahjoub, Yazine Desmeulles, Isabelle Quintard, Hervé Lefrant, Jean-Yves Muller, Laurent Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Fluid challenge (FC) is one of the most common practices in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The present study aimed to evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment of the response to FC at the end of the infusion or 20 min later could affect the results of the FC. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study including all ICU patients in septic shock requiring a FC of 500 mL crystalloids over 10 min. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a > 15% increase in stroke volume (SV) assessed by velocity-time integral (VTI) measurements at baseline (T(0)), at the end of FC (T(10)), then 10 (T(20)) and 20 min (T(30)) after the end of FC. RESULTS: From May 20, 2014, to January 7, 2016, a total of 143 patients were enrolled in 11 French ICUs (mean age 64 ± 14 years, median IGS II 53 [43–63], median SOFA score 10 [8–12]). Among the 76/143 (53%) patient responders to FC at T(10), 37 patients were transient responders (TR), i.e., became non-responders (NR) at T(30) (49%, 95%CI = [37–60]), and 39 (51%, 95%CI = [38–62]) patients were persistent responders (PR), i.e., remained responders at T(30). Among the 67 NR at T(10), 4 became responders at T30, (6%, 95%CI = [1.9–15.3]). In the subgroup analysis, no statistical difference in hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters was found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 51.3% of initial responders have a persistent response to fluid 30 min after the beginning of fluid infusion and only 41.3% have a transient response highlighting that fluid responsiveness is time dependent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02116413. Registered on April 16, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6524325/ /pubmed/31097012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Roger, Claire
Zieleskiewicz, Laurent
Demattei, Christophe
Lakhal, Karim
Piton, Gael
Louart, Benjamin
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Chabanne, Russell
Faure, Jean-Sébastien
Mahjoub, Yazine
Desmeulles, Isabelle
Quintard, Hervé
Lefrant, Jean-Yves
Muller, Laurent
Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study
title Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study
title_full Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study
title_fullStr Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study
title_full_unstemmed Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study
title_short Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study
title_sort time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (fcrev) study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31097012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rogerclaire timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT zieleskiewiczlaurent timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT dematteichristophe timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT lakhalkarim timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT pitongael timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT louartbenjamin timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT constantinjeanmichel timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT chabannerussell timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT faurejeansebastien timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT mahjoubyazine timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT desmeullesisabelle timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT quintardherve timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT lefrantjeanyves timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT mullerlaurent timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy
AT timecourseoffluidresponsivenessinsepsisthefluidchallengerevisitingfcrevstudy