Cargando…

The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints

The relative importance of neural temporal and place coding in auditory perception is still a matter of much debate. The current article is a compilation of viewpoints from leading auditory psychophysicists and physiologists regarding the upper frequency limit for the use of neural phase locking to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verschooten, Eric, Shamma, Shihab, Oxenham, Andrew J., Moore, Brian C.J., Joris, Philip X., Heinz, Michael G., Plack, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.011
_version_ 1783419586106884096
author Verschooten, Eric
Shamma, Shihab
Oxenham, Andrew J.
Moore, Brian C.J.
Joris, Philip X.
Heinz, Michael G.
Plack, Christopher J.
author_facet Verschooten, Eric
Shamma, Shihab
Oxenham, Andrew J.
Moore, Brian C.J.
Joris, Philip X.
Heinz, Michael G.
Plack, Christopher J.
author_sort Verschooten, Eric
collection PubMed
description The relative importance of neural temporal and place coding in auditory perception is still a matter of much debate. The current article is a compilation of viewpoints from leading auditory psychophysicists and physiologists regarding the upper frequency limit for the use of neural phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans. While phase locking is used for binaural processing up to about 1500 Hz, there is disagreement regarding the use of monaural phase-locking information at higher frequencies. Estimates of the general upper limit proposed by the contributors range from 1500 to 10000 Hz. The arguments depend on whether or not phase locking is needed to explain psychophysical discrimination performance at frequencies above 1500 Hz, and whether or not the phase-locked neural representation is sufficiently robust at these frequencies to provide useable information. The contributors suggest key experiments that may help to resolve this issue, and experimental findings that may cause them to change their minds. This issue is of crucial importance to our understanding of the neural basis of auditory perception in general, and of pitch perception in particular.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65246352019-06-01 The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints Verschooten, Eric Shamma, Shihab Oxenham, Andrew J. Moore, Brian C.J. Joris, Philip X. Heinz, Michael G. Plack, Christopher J. Hear Res Article The relative importance of neural temporal and place coding in auditory perception is still a matter of much debate. The current article is a compilation of viewpoints from leading auditory psychophysicists and physiologists regarding the upper frequency limit for the use of neural phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans. While phase locking is used for binaural processing up to about 1500 Hz, there is disagreement regarding the use of monaural phase-locking information at higher frequencies. Estimates of the general upper limit proposed by the contributors range from 1500 to 10000 Hz. The arguments depend on whether or not phase locking is needed to explain psychophysical discrimination performance at frequencies above 1500 Hz, and whether or not the phase-locked neural representation is sufficiently robust at these frequencies to provide useable information. The contributors suggest key experiments that may help to resolve this issue, and experimental findings that may cause them to change their minds. This issue is of crucial importance to our understanding of the neural basis of auditory perception in general, and of pitch perception in particular. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6524635/ /pubmed/30927686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.011 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Verschooten, Eric
Shamma, Shihab
Oxenham, Andrew J.
Moore, Brian C.J.
Joris, Philip X.
Heinz, Michael G.
Plack, Christopher J.
The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints
title The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints
title_full The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints
title_fullStr The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints
title_full_unstemmed The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints
title_short The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints
title_sort upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: a compilation of viewpoints
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.011
work_keys_str_mv AT verschooteneric theupperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT shammashihab theupperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT oxenhamandrewj theupperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT moorebriancj theupperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT jorisphilipx theupperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT heinzmichaelg theupperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT plackchristopherj theupperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT verschooteneric upperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT shammashihab upperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT oxenhamandrewj upperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT moorebriancj upperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT jorisphilipx upperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT heinzmichaelg upperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints
AT plackchristopherj upperfrequencylimitfortheuseofphaselockingtocodetemporalfinestructureinhumansacompilationofviewpoints