Cargando…

Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis

We are developing electrical approaches to treat biofilm‐associated orthopedic foreign‐body infection. Although we have previously shown that such approaches have antibiofilm activity, the effects on bone have not been assessed. Herein, low‐amperage 200 μA fixed direct current (DC) was compared with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt‐Malan, Suzannah M, Brinkman, Cassandra L, Karau, Melissa J, Brown, Robert A, Waletzki, Brian E, Berglund, Lawrence J, Schuetz, Audrey N, Greenwood‐Quaintance, Kerryl E, Mandrekar, Jayawant N, Patel, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10119
_version_ 1783419590075744256
author Schmidt‐Malan, Suzannah M
Brinkman, Cassandra L
Karau, Melissa J
Brown, Robert A
Waletzki, Brian E
Berglund, Lawrence J
Schuetz, Audrey N
Greenwood‐Quaintance, Kerryl E
Mandrekar, Jayawant N
Patel, Robin
author_facet Schmidt‐Malan, Suzannah M
Brinkman, Cassandra L
Karau, Melissa J
Brown, Robert A
Waletzki, Brian E
Berglund, Lawrence J
Schuetz, Audrey N
Greenwood‐Quaintance, Kerryl E
Mandrekar, Jayawant N
Patel, Robin
author_sort Schmidt‐Malan, Suzannah M
collection PubMed
description We are developing electrical approaches to treat biofilm‐associated orthopedic foreign‐body infection. Although we have previously shown that such approaches have antibiofilm activity, the effects on bone have not been assessed. Herein, low‐amperage 200 μA fixed direct current (DC) was compared with no current, in a rat femoral foreign‐body infection model. In the infected group, a platinum implant seeded with S. epidermidis biofilm (10(5) CFU/cm(2)), plus 50 μL of a 10(9) CFU suspension of bacteria, were placed in the femoral medullary cavity of 71 rats. One week later, rats were assigned to one of four groups: infected with no current or DC, or uninfected with no current or DC. After 2 weeks, bones were removed and subjected to histopathology, micro‐computed tomography (μCT), and strength testing. Histopathology showed no inflammation or bony changes/remodeling in the uninfected no current group, and some osteoid formation in the DC group; bones from the infected no current group had evidence of inflammation without bony changes/remodeling; along with inflammation, there was moderate osteoid present in the DC group. μCT showed more cortical bone volume and density, trabecular thickness, and cancellous bone volume in the DC group compared with the no current group, for both uninfected and infected bones (p < 0.05). There was no difference in torsional strength or stiffness between the no current versus DC groups, for both infected and uninfected bones (p > 0.05). © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6524671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65246712019-05-24 Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis Schmidt‐Malan, Suzannah M Brinkman, Cassandra L Karau, Melissa J Brown, Robert A Waletzki, Brian E Berglund, Lawrence J Schuetz, Audrey N Greenwood‐Quaintance, Kerryl E Mandrekar, Jayawant N Patel, Robin JBMR Plus Original Articles We are developing electrical approaches to treat biofilm‐associated orthopedic foreign‐body infection. Although we have previously shown that such approaches have antibiofilm activity, the effects on bone have not been assessed. Herein, low‐amperage 200 μA fixed direct current (DC) was compared with no current, in a rat femoral foreign‐body infection model. In the infected group, a platinum implant seeded with S. epidermidis biofilm (10(5) CFU/cm(2)), plus 50 μL of a 10(9) CFU suspension of bacteria, were placed in the femoral medullary cavity of 71 rats. One week later, rats were assigned to one of four groups: infected with no current or DC, or uninfected with no current or DC. After 2 weeks, bones were removed and subjected to histopathology, micro‐computed tomography (μCT), and strength testing. Histopathology showed no inflammation or bony changes/remodeling in the uninfected no current group, and some osteoid formation in the DC group; bones from the infected no current group had evidence of inflammation without bony changes/remodeling; along with inflammation, there was moderate osteoid present in the DC group. μCT showed more cortical bone volume and density, trabecular thickness, and cancellous bone volume in the DC group compared with the no current group, for both uninfected and infected bones (p < 0.05). There was no difference in torsional strength or stiffness between the no current versus DC groups, for both infected and uninfected bones (p > 0.05). © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6524671/ /pubmed/31131342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10119 Text en © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schmidt‐Malan, Suzannah M
Brinkman, Cassandra L
Karau, Melissa J
Brown, Robert A
Waletzki, Brian E
Berglund, Lawrence J
Schuetz, Audrey N
Greenwood‐Quaintance, Kerryl E
Mandrekar, Jayawant N
Patel, Robin
Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis
title Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis
title_full Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis
title_fullStr Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis
title_short Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis
title_sort effect of direct electrical current on bones infected with staphylococcus epidermidis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10119
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtmalansuzannahm effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT brinkmancassandral effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT karaumelissaj effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT brownroberta effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT waletzkibriane effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT berglundlawrencej effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT schuetzaudreyn effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT greenwoodquaintancekerryle effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT mandrekarjayawantn effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis
AT patelrobin effectofdirectelectricalcurrentonbonesinfectedwithstaphylococcusepidermidis