Cargando…
The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)–induced anal cancer is increasingly problematic among HIV-positive patients. Anal cancer is preceded by precursor lesions, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). AIN detection requires high-resolution anoscopy, a cumbersome and time...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz191 |
_version_ | 1783419617958428672 |
---|---|
author | Dias Gonçalves Lima, Fernando Viset, Janine D Leeflang, Mariska M G Limpens, Jacqueline Prins, Jan M de Vries, Henry J C |
author_facet | Dias Gonçalves Lima, Fernando Viset, Janine D Leeflang, Mariska M G Limpens, Jacqueline Prins, Jan M de Vries, Henry J C |
author_sort | Dias Gonçalves Lima, Fernando |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)–induced anal cancer is increasingly problematic among HIV-positive patients. Anal cancer is preceded by precursor lesions, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). AIN detection requires high-resolution anoscopy, a cumbersome and time-consuming procedure. We aggregated evidence on anal swab–based tests to detect AIN in HIV-positive patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for cross-sectional studies on AIN detection with anal cytology, HR-HPV DNA detection, HPV E6/E7 mRNA analysis, and P16INK4a and Ki-67 immunostaining. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate logistic regression. Cytology was reported using the terms squamous intra-epithelial lesion (SIL) for AIN and high-grade SIL (HSIL) for high-grade AIN (HGAIN). RESULTS: We included 22 studies. Using cytology with a cutoff of any SIL to detect HGAIN, we detected a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, 74%–87%) and specificity of 45% (95% CI, 44%–66%); with the cutoff of HSIL, the sensitivity was 44% (95% CI, 45%–67%) and the specificity was 79% (95% CI, 69%-87%). The sensitivity of HPV DNA to detect HGAIN was 91% (95% CI, 82%–95%) and the specificity was 27% (95% CI, 21%–33%). For MSM, the positive predictive value (PPV) of cytology with a cutoff of any SIL was 36% (95% CI, 23%–50%) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 87% (95% CI, 78%–93%), whereas cytology with a cutoff of HSIL had a PPV of 62% (95% CI, 50%–73%) and an NPV of 78% (95% CI, 65%–87%). The PPV of HR-HPV DNA detection was 37% (95% CI, 20%–57%) and the NPV was 87% (95% CI, 79%–93%). CONCLUSIONS: Given its sensitivity, cytology with a cutoff of any SIL could be considered as a triaging method, whereas cytology with a cutoff of HSIL had better specificity and could be used for quality assurance. HR-HPV DNA detection had poor specificity and PPV, making it unsuitable for triage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6524827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65248272019-05-23 The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Dias Gonçalves Lima, Fernando Viset, Janine D Leeflang, Mariska M G Limpens, Jacqueline Prins, Jan M de Vries, Henry J C Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: The incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)–induced anal cancer is increasingly problematic among HIV-positive patients. Anal cancer is preceded by precursor lesions, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). AIN detection requires high-resolution anoscopy, a cumbersome and time-consuming procedure. We aggregated evidence on anal swab–based tests to detect AIN in HIV-positive patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for cross-sectional studies on AIN detection with anal cytology, HR-HPV DNA detection, HPV E6/E7 mRNA analysis, and P16INK4a and Ki-67 immunostaining. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate logistic regression. Cytology was reported using the terms squamous intra-epithelial lesion (SIL) for AIN and high-grade SIL (HSIL) for high-grade AIN (HGAIN). RESULTS: We included 22 studies. Using cytology with a cutoff of any SIL to detect HGAIN, we detected a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, 74%–87%) and specificity of 45% (95% CI, 44%–66%); with the cutoff of HSIL, the sensitivity was 44% (95% CI, 45%–67%) and the specificity was 79% (95% CI, 69%-87%). The sensitivity of HPV DNA to detect HGAIN was 91% (95% CI, 82%–95%) and the specificity was 27% (95% CI, 21%–33%). For MSM, the positive predictive value (PPV) of cytology with a cutoff of any SIL was 36% (95% CI, 23%–50%) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 87% (95% CI, 78%–93%), whereas cytology with a cutoff of HSIL had a PPV of 62% (95% CI, 50%–73%) and an NPV of 78% (95% CI, 65%–87%). The PPV of HR-HPV DNA detection was 37% (95% CI, 20%–57%) and the NPV was 87% (95% CI, 79%–93%). CONCLUSIONS: Given its sensitivity, cytology with a cutoff of any SIL could be considered as a triaging method, whereas cytology with a cutoff of HSIL had better specificity and could be used for quality assurance. HR-HPV DNA detection had poor specificity and PPV, making it unsuitable for triage. Oxford University Press 2019-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6524827/ /pubmed/31123696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz191 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Dias Gonçalves Lima, Fernando Viset, Janine D Leeflang, Mariska M G Limpens, Jacqueline Prins, Jan M de Vries, Henry J C The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | The Accuracy of Anal Swab–Based Tests to Detect High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of anal swab–based tests to detect high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in hiv-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diasgoncalveslimafernando theaccuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT visetjanined theaccuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeflangmariskamg theaccuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limpensjacqueline theaccuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT prinsjanm theaccuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT devrieshenryjc theaccuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT diasgoncalveslimafernando accuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT visetjanined accuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeflangmariskamg accuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limpensjacqueline accuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT prinsjanm accuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT devrieshenryjc accuracyofanalswabbasedteststodetecthighgradeanalintraepithelialneoplasiainhivinfectedpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |