Cargando…
Erratum to: “Comparison of ACUITY, CRUSADE, and GRACE Risk Scales for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy”
Autores principales: | Choi, Sun Young, Kim, Moo Hyun, Serebruany, Victor |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677685 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of ACUITY, CRUSADE, and GRACE Risk Scales for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy
por: Choi, Sun Young, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
CRUSADE Score is Superior to Platelet Function Testing for Prediction of Bleeding in Patients Following Coronary Interventions()
por: Bang, Junghee, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of ACUITY and CRUSADE Scores in Predicting Major Bleeding
during Acute Coronary Syndrome
por: Correia, Luis C. L., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Incremental Value of the CRUSADE, ACUITY, and HAS‐BLED Risk Scores for the Prediction of Hemorrhagic Events After Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients Undergoing Long or Short Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
por: Costa, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome: Evaluation of the GRACE and CRUSADE scores in the setting of a tertiary care centre
por: Tscherny, Katharina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)