Cargando…
Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment
Objectives The objective of this registry was to study the safety of prehospital initiation of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Background Ticagrelor has replaced clopidogrel in many hospitals as the routinely used antiplatelet drug in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673389 |
_version_ | 1783419632922656768 |
---|---|
author | Bergmeijer, Thomas O. van Oevelen, Mathijs Janssen, Paul W. A. Godschalk, Thea C. Lichtveld, Robert A. Kelder, Johannes C. Voskuil, Michiel Mosterd, Arend Montalescot, Gilles ten Berg, Jurriën M. |
author_facet | Bergmeijer, Thomas O. van Oevelen, Mathijs Janssen, Paul W. A. Godschalk, Thea C. Lichtveld, Robert A. Kelder, Johannes C. Voskuil, Michiel Mosterd, Arend Montalescot, Gilles ten Berg, Jurriën M. |
author_sort | Bergmeijer, Thomas O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives The objective of this registry was to study the safety of prehospital initiation of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Background Ticagrelor has replaced clopidogrel in many hospitals as the routinely used antiplatelet drug in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Nevertheless, in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor was associated with an increase in non-CABG (non–coronary artery bypass grafting)-related major bleeding. Data comparing the safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment are not available. Methods A retrospective, multicenter registry was performed. Selection criteria were the administration of a prehospital loading dose of ticagrelor or clopidogrel according to the ambulance STEMI treatment protocol and the presentation to a percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospital in our region between January 2011 and December 2012. Follow-up was performed using the electronic patient files for the time period between the antiplatelet loading dose and hospital discharge. The data were analyzed using a primary bleeding end point (any bleeding) and a secondary thrombotic end point (all-cause mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or transient ischemic attack). Results Data of 304 clopidogrel-treated and 309 ticagrelor-treated patients were available for analysis. No significant difference in bleeding rate was observed between both groups, using univariate (17.8 vs. 20.1%; p = 0.47; odds ratio, 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.74]) and multivariate ( p = 0.42) analysis. Also for the secondary thrombotic end point (6.3 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.45), no significant differences were observed. Conclusion In this real-world registry, no significant differences in bleeding or thrombotic event rate were found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6524899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65248992019-06-27 Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment Bergmeijer, Thomas O. van Oevelen, Mathijs Janssen, Paul W. A. Godschalk, Thea C. Lichtveld, Robert A. Kelder, Johannes C. Voskuil, Michiel Mosterd, Arend Montalescot, Gilles ten Berg, Jurriën M. TH Open Objectives The objective of this registry was to study the safety of prehospital initiation of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Background Ticagrelor has replaced clopidogrel in many hospitals as the routinely used antiplatelet drug in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Nevertheless, in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor was associated with an increase in non-CABG (non–coronary artery bypass grafting)-related major bleeding. Data comparing the safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment are not available. Methods A retrospective, multicenter registry was performed. Selection criteria were the administration of a prehospital loading dose of ticagrelor or clopidogrel according to the ambulance STEMI treatment protocol and the presentation to a percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospital in our region between January 2011 and December 2012. Follow-up was performed using the electronic patient files for the time period between the antiplatelet loading dose and hospital discharge. The data were analyzed using a primary bleeding end point (any bleeding) and a secondary thrombotic end point (all-cause mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or transient ischemic attack). Results Data of 304 clopidogrel-treated and 309 ticagrelor-treated patients were available for analysis. No significant difference in bleeding rate was observed between both groups, using univariate (17.8 vs. 20.1%; p = 0.47; odds ratio, 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.74]) and multivariate ( p = 0.42) analysis. Also for the secondary thrombotic end point (6.3 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.45), no significant differences were observed. Conclusion In this real-world registry, no significant differences in bleeding or thrombotic event rate were found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6524899/ /pubmed/31249961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673389 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Bergmeijer, Thomas O. van Oevelen, Mathijs Janssen, Paul W. A. Godschalk, Thea C. Lichtveld, Robert A. Kelder, Johannes C. Voskuil, Michiel Mosterd, Arend Montalescot, Gilles ten Berg, Jurriën M. Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment |
title | Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment |
title_full | Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment |
title_fullStr | Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment |
title_short | Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment |
title_sort | safety of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergmeijerthomaso safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT vanoevelenmathijs safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT janssenpaulwa safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT godschalktheac safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT lichtveldroberta safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT kelderjohannesc safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT voskuilmichiel safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT mosterdarend safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT montalescotgilles safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment AT tenbergjurrienm safetyofticagrelorcomparedtoclopidogrelafterprehospitalinitiationoftreatment |