Cargando…

Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in involving patient preferences for benefits and risks in regulatory decision making. Therefore, it is essential to identify patient perspectives regarding the value of patient preference information (PPI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bywall, Karin Schölin, Veldwijk, Jorien, Hansson, Mats G., Kihlbom, Ulrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0344-2
_version_ 1783419662908784640
author Bywall, Karin Schölin
Veldwijk, Jorien
Hansson, Mats G.
Kihlbom, Ulrik
author_facet Bywall, Karin Schölin
Veldwijk, Jorien
Hansson, Mats G.
Kihlbom, Ulrik
author_sort Bywall, Karin Schölin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in involving patient preferences for benefits and risks in regulatory decision making. Therefore, it is essential to identify patient perspectives regarding the value of patient preference information (PPI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore how patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) value the use of PPI in regulatory decision making regarding medical products. METHODS: Regulators and patients with RA were interviewed to gather initial insights into opinions on the use of PPI in regulatory decisions regarding medical products. The interviews were used to draft and validate the interview guide for focus groups with patients with RA. Participants were purposively sampled in collaboration with the Swedish Rheumatism Association in Stockholm and Uppsala. Each focus group consisted of three to six patients (18 in total). All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: According to the participants, PPI could lead to regulators considering patients’ needs, lifestyles and well-being when making decisions. PPI was important in all stages of the medical product lifecycle. Participants reported that, when participating in a preference study, it is important to be well-informed about the use of the study and the development, components, administration, and risks related to the medical products. CONCLUSIONS: Patients thought PPI could be valuable to consider in regulatory decisions. It is essential for patients to be well-informed when asked for their preferences. Research on information materials to inform patients in preference studies is needed to increase the value of PPI in regulatory decision making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40271-018-0344-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6525140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65251402019-06-05 Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Bywall, Karin Schölin Veldwijk, Jorien Hansson, Mats G. Kihlbom, Ulrik Patient Original Research Article BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in involving patient preferences for benefits and risks in regulatory decision making. Therefore, it is essential to identify patient perspectives regarding the value of patient preference information (PPI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore how patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) value the use of PPI in regulatory decision making regarding medical products. METHODS: Regulators and patients with RA were interviewed to gather initial insights into opinions on the use of PPI in regulatory decisions regarding medical products. The interviews were used to draft and validate the interview guide for focus groups with patients with RA. Participants were purposively sampled in collaboration with the Swedish Rheumatism Association in Stockholm and Uppsala. Each focus group consisted of three to six patients (18 in total). All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: According to the participants, PPI could lead to regulators considering patients’ needs, lifestyles and well-being when making decisions. PPI was important in all stages of the medical product lifecycle. Participants reported that, when participating in a preference study, it is important to be well-informed about the use of the study and the development, components, administration, and risks related to the medical products. CONCLUSIONS: Patients thought PPI could be valuable to consider in regulatory decisions. It is essential for patients to be well-informed when asked for their preferences. Research on information materials to inform patients in preference studies is needed to increase the value of PPI in regulatory decision making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40271-018-0344-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-15 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6525140/ /pubmed/30443897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0344-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bywall, Karin Schölin
Veldwijk, Jorien
Hansson, Mats G.
Kihlbom, Ulrik
Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort patient perspectives on the value of patient preference information in regulatory decision making: a qualitative study in swedish patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30443897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0344-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bywallkarinscholin patientperspectivesonthevalueofpatientpreferenceinformationinregulatorydecisionmakingaqualitativestudyinswedishpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT veldwijkjorien patientperspectivesonthevalueofpatientpreferenceinformationinregulatorydecisionmakingaqualitativestudyinswedishpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT hanssonmatsg patientperspectivesonthevalueofpatientpreferenceinformationinregulatorydecisionmakingaqualitativestudyinswedishpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT kihlbomulrik patientperspectivesonthevalueofpatientpreferenceinformationinregulatorydecisionmakingaqualitativestudyinswedishpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis