Cargando…
Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies
BACKGROUND: Environmental and genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of breast cancer. Several small blood-based DNA methylation studies have reported risk associations with methylation at individual CpGs and average methylation levels; however, these findings require validation in l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1145-9 |
_version_ | 1783419718134136832 |
---|---|
author | Bodelon, Clara Ambatipudi, Srikant Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Johansson, Annelie Sampson, Joshua N. Hicks, Belynda Karlins, Eric Hutchinson, Amy Cuenin, Cyrille Chajès, Veronique Southey, Melissa C. Romieu, Isabelle Giles, Graham G. English, Dallas Polidoro, Silvia Assumma, Manuela Baglietto, Laura Vineis, Paolo Severi, Gianluca Herceg, Zdenko Flanagan, James M. Milne, Roger L. Garcia-Closas, Montserrat |
author_facet | Bodelon, Clara Ambatipudi, Srikant Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Johansson, Annelie Sampson, Joshua N. Hicks, Belynda Karlins, Eric Hutchinson, Amy Cuenin, Cyrille Chajès, Veronique Southey, Melissa C. Romieu, Isabelle Giles, Graham G. English, Dallas Polidoro, Silvia Assumma, Manuela Baglietto, Laura Vineis, Paolo Severi, Gianluca Herceg, Zdenko Flanagan, James M. Milne, Roger L. Garcia-Closas, Montserrat |
author_sort | Bodelon, Clara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Environmental and genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of breast cancer. Several small blood-based DNA methylation studies have reported risk associations with methylation at individual CpGs and average methylation levels; however, these findings require validation in larger prospective cohort studies. To investigate the role of blood DNA methylation on breast cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies, including a total of 1663 incident cases and 1885 controls, the largest study of blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk to date. METHODS: We assessed associations with methylation at 365,145 CpGs present in the HumanMethylation450 (HM450K) Beadchip, after excluding CpGs that did not pass quality controls in all studies. Each of the four cohorts estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between each individual CpG and breast cancer risk. In addition, each study assessed the association between average methylation measures and breast cancer risk, adjusted and unadjusted for cell-type composition. Study-specific ORs were combined using fixed-effect meta-analysis with inverse variance weights. Stratified analyses were conducted by age at diagnosis (< 50, ≥ 50), estrogen receptor (ER) status (+/−), and time since blood collection (< 5, 5–10, > 10 years). The false discovery rate (q value) was used to account for multiple testing. RESULTS: The average age at blood draw ranged from 52.2 to 62.2 years across the four cohorts. Median follow-up time ranged from 6.6 to 8.4 years. The methylation measured at individual CpGs was not associated with breast cancer risk (q value > 0.59). In addition, higher average methylation level was not associated with risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.85, 1.05; P = 0.26; P for study heterogeneity = 0.86). We found no evidence of modification of this association by age at diagnosis (P = 0.17), ER status (P = 0.88), time since blood collection (P = 0.98), or CpG location (P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that DNA methylation measured in the blood prior to breast cancer diagnosis in predominantly postmenopausal women is unlikely to be associated with substantial breast cancer risk on the HM450K array. Larger studies or with greater methylation coverage are needed to determine if associations exist between blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1145-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6525390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65253902019-05-24 Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies Bodelon, Clara Ambatipudi, Srikant Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Johansson, Annelie Sampson, Joshua N. Hicks, Belynda Karlins, Eric Hutchinson, Amy Cuenin, Cyrille Chajès, Veronique Southey, Melissa C. Romieu, Isabelle Giles, Graham G. English, Dallas Polidoro, Silvia Assumma, Manuela Baglietto, Laura Vineis, Paolo Severi, Gianluca Herceg, Zdenko Flanagan, James M. Milne, Roger L. Garcia-Closas, Montserrat Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Environmental and genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of breast cancer. Several small blood-based DNA methylation studies have reported risk associations with methylation at individual CpGs and average methylation levels; however, these findings require validation in larger prospective cohort studies. To investigate the role of blood DNA methylation on breast cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies, including a total of 1663 incident cases and 1885 controls, the largest study of blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk to date. METHODS: We assessed associations with methylation at 365,145 CpGs present in the HumanMethylation450 (HM450K) Beadchip, after excluding CpGs that did not pass quality controls in all studies. Each of the four cohorts estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between each individual CpG and breast cancer risk. In addition, each study assessed the association between average methylation measures and breast cancer risk, adjusted and unadjusted for cell-type composition. Study-specific ORs were combined using fixed-effect meta-analysis with inverse variance weights. Stratified analyses were conducted by age at diagnosis (< 50, ≥ 50), estrogen receptor (ER) status (+/−), and time since blood collection (< 5, 5–10, > 10 years). The false discovery rate (q value) was used to account for multiple testing. RESULTS: The average age at blood draw ranged from 52.2 to 62.2 years across the four cohorts. Median follow-up time ranged from 6.6 to 8.4 years. The methylation measured at individual CpGs was not associated with breast cancer risk (q value > 0.59). In addition, higher average methylation level was not associated with risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.85, 1.05; P = 0.26; P for study heterogeneity = 0.86). We found no evidence of modification of this association by age at diagnosis (P = 0.17), ER status (P = 0.88), time since blood collection (P = 0.98), or CpG location (P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that DNA methylation measured in the blood prior to breast cancer diagnosis in predominantly postmenopausal women is unlikely to be associated with substantial breast cancer risk on the HM450K array. Larger studies or with greater methylation coverage are needed to determine if associations exist between blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1145-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6525390/ /pubmed/31101124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1145-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bodelon, Clara Ambatipudi, Srikant Dugué, Pierre-Antoine Johansson, Annelie Sampson, Joshua N. Hicks, Belynda Karlins, Eric Hutchinson, Amy Cuenin, Cyrille Chajès, Veronique Southey, Melissa C. Romieu, Isabelle Giles, Graham G. English, Dallas Polidoro, Silvia Assumma, Manuela Baglietto, Laura Vineis, Paolo Severi, Gianluca Herceg, Zdenko Flanagan, James M. Milne, Roger L. Garcia-Closas, Montserrat Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies |
title | Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies |
title_full | Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies |
title_fullStr | Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies |
title_short | Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies |
title_sort | blood dna methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1145-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bodelonclara blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT ambatipudisrikant blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT duguepierreantoine blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT johanssonannelie blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT sampsonjoshuan blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT hicksbelynda blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT karlinseric blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT hutchinsonamy blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT cuenincyrille blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT chajesveronique blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT southeymelissac blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT romieuisabelle blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT gilesgrahamg blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT englishdallas blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT polidorosilvia blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT assummamanuela blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT bagliettolaura blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT vineispaolo blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT severigianluca blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT hercegzdenko blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT flanaganjamesm blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT milnerogerl blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies AT garciaclosasmontserrat blooddnamethylationandbreastcancerriskametaanalysisoffourprospectivecohortstudies |