Cargando…
The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0594-0 |
_version_ | 1783419729421008896 |
---|---|
author | Kaufman, Howard L. Atkins, Michael B. Subedi, Prasun Wu, James Chambers, James Joseph Mattingly, T. Campbell, Jonathan D. Allen, Jeff Ferris, Andrea E. Schilsky, Richard L. Danielson, Daniel Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard House, Linda Selig, Wendy K. D. |
author_facet | Kaufman, Howard L. Atkins, Michael B. Subedi, Prasun Wu, James Chambers, James Joseph Mattingly, T. Campbell, Jonathan D. Allen, Jeff Ferris, Andrea E. Schilsky, Richard L. Danielson, Daniel Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard House, Linda Selig, Wendy K. D. |
author_sort | Kaufman, Howard L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple stakeholders have been considering the question of “What makes I-O transformative?” Evaluating the distinct features and attributes of these therapies, and better characterizing how patients experience them, will inform such assessments. This paper defines ways in which treatment with I-O is different from other therapies. It also proposes key aspects and attributes of I-O therapies that should be considered in any assessment of their value and seeks to address evidence gaps in existing value frameworks given the unique properties of patient outcomes with I-O therapy. The paper concludes with a “data needs catalogue” (DNC) predicated on the belief that multiple key, unique elements that are necessary to fully characterize the value of I-O therapies are not routinely or robustly measured in current clinical practice or reimbursement databases and are infrequently captured in existing research studies. A better characterization of the benefit of I-O treatment will allow a more thorough assessment of its benefits and provide a template for the design and prioritization of future clinical trials and a roadmap for healthcare insurers to optimize coverage for patients with cancers eligible for I-O therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6525438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65254382019-05-24 The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment Kaufman, Howard L. Atkins, Michael B. Subedi, Prasun Wu, James Chambers, James Joseph Mattingly, T. Campbell, Jonathan D. Allen, Jeff Ferris, Andrea E. Schilsky, Richard L. Danielson, Daniel Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard House, Linda Selig, Wendy K. D. J Immunother Cancer Position Article and Guidelines The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple stakeholders have been considering the question of “What makes I-O transformative?” Evaluating the distinct features and attributes of these therapies, and better characterizing how patients experience them, will inform such assessments. This paper defines ways in which treatment with I-O is different from other therapies. It also proposes key aspects and attributes of I-O therapies that should be considered in any assessment of their value and seeks to address evidence gaps in existing value frameworks given the unique properties of patient outcomes with I-O therapy. The paper concludes with a “data needs catalogue” (DNC) predicated on the belief that multiple key, unique elements that are necessary to fully characterize the value of I-O therapies are not routinely or robustly measured in current clinical practice or reimbursement databases and are infrequently captured in existing research studies. A better characterization of the benefit of I-O treatment will allow a more thorough assessment of its benefits and provide a template for the design and prioritization of future clinical trials and a roadmap for healthcare insurers to optimize coverage for patients with cancers eligible for I-O therapy. BioMed Central 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6525438/ /pubmed/31101066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0594-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Position Article and Guidelines Kaufman, Howard L. Atkins, Michael B. Subedi, Prasun Wu, James Chambers, James Joseph Mattingly, T. Campbell, Jonathan D. Allen, Jeff Ferris, Andrea E. Schilsky, Richard L. Danielson, Daniel Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard House, Linda Selig, Wendy K. D. The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment |
title | The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment |
title_full | The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment |
title_fullStr | The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment |
title_short | The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment |
title_sort | promise of immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment |
topic | Position Article and Guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0594-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaufmanhowardl thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT atkinsmichaelb thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT subediprasun thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT wujames thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT chambersjames thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT josephmattinglyt thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT campbelljonathand thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT allenjeff thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT ferrisandreae thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT schilskyrichardl thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT danielsondaniel thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT lichtenfeldjleonard thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT houselinda thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT seligwendykd thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT kaufmanhowardl promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT atkinsmichaelb promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT subediprasun promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT wujames promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT chambersjames promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT josephmattinglyt promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT campbelljonathand promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT allenjeff promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT ferrisandreae promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT schilskyrichardl promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT danielsondaniel promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT lichtenfeldjleonard promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT houselinda promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment AT seligwendykd promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment |