Cargando…

The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment

The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaufman, Howard L., Atkins, Michael B., Subedi, Prasun, Wu, James, Chambers, James, Joseph Mattingly, T., Campbell, Jonathan D., Allen, Jeff, Ferris, Andrea E., Schilsky, Richard L., Danielson, Daniel, Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard, House, Linda, Selig, Wendy K. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0594-0
_version_ 1783419729421008896
author Kaufman, Howard L.
Atkins, Michael B.
Subedi, Prasun
Wu, James
Chambers, James
Joseph Mattingly, T.
Campbell, Jonathan D.
Allen, Jeff
Ferris, Andrea E.
Schilsky, Richard L.
Danielson, Daniel
Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard
House, Linda
Selig, Wendy K. D.
author_facet Kaufman, Howard L.
Atkins, Michael B.
Subedi, Prasun
Wu, James
Chambers, James
Joseph Mattingly, T.
Campbell, Jonathan D.
Allen, Jeff
Ferris, Andrea E.
Schilsky, Richard L.
Danielson, Daniel
Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard
House, Linda
Selig, Wendy K. D.
author_sort Kaufman, Howard L.
collection PubMed
description The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple stakeholders have been considering the question of “What makes I-O transformative?” Evaluating the distinct features and attributes of these therapies, and better characterizing how patients experience them, will inform such assessments. This paper defines ways in which treatment with I-O is different from other therapies. It also proposes key aspects and attributes of I-O therapies that should be considered in any assessment of their value and seeks to address evidence gaps in existing value frameworks given the unique properties of patient outcomes with I-O therapy. The paper concludes with a “data needs catalogue” (DNC) predicated on the belief that multiple key, unique elements that are necessary to fully characterize the value of I-O therapies are not routinely or robustly measured in current clinical practice or reimbursement databases and are infrequently captured in existing research studies. A better characterization of the benefit of I-O treatment will allow a more thorough assessment of its benefits and provide a template for the design and prioritization of future clinical trials and a roadmap for healthcare insurers to optimize coverage for patients with cancers eligible for I-O therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6525438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65254382019-05-24 The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment Kaufman, Howard L. Atkins, Michael B. Subedi, Prasun Wu, James Chambers, James Joseph Mattingly, T. Campbell, Jonathan D. Allen, Jeff Ferris, Andrea E. Schilsky, Richard L. Danielson, Daniel Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard House, Linda Selig, Wendy K. D. J Immunother Cancer Position Article and Guidelines The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple stakeholders have been considering the question of “What makes I-O transformative?” Evaluating the distinct features and attributes of these therapies, and better characterizing how patients experience them, will inform such assessments. This paper defines ways in which treatment with I-O is different from other therapies. It also proposes key aspects and attributes of I-O therapies that should be considered in any assessment of their value and seeks to address evidence gaps in existing value frameworks given the unique properties of patient outcomes with I-O therapy. The paper concludes with a “data needs catalogue” (DNC) predicated on the belief that multiple key, unique elements that are necessary to fully characterize the value of I-O therapies are not routinely or robustly measured in current clinical practice or reimbursement databases and are infrequently captured in existing research studies. A better characterization of the benefit of I-O treatment will allow a more thorough assessment of its benefits and provide a template for the design and prioritization of future clinical trials and a roadmap for healthcare insurers to optimize coverage for patients with cancers eligible for I-O therapy. BioMed Central 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6525438/ /pubmed/31101066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0594-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Position Article and Guidelines
Kaufman, Howard L.
Atkins, Michael B.
Subedi, Prasun
Wu, James
Chambers, James
Joseph Mattingly, T.
Campbell, Jonathan D.
Allen, Jeff
Ferris, Andrea E.
Schilsky, Richard L.
Danielson, Daniel
Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard
House, Linda
Selig, Wendy K. D.
The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
title The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
title_full The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
title_fullStr The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
title_full_unstemmed The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
title_short The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
title_sort promise of immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment
topic Position Article and Guidelines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6525438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0594-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmanhowardl thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT atkinsmichaelb thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT subediprasun thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT wujames thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT chambersjames thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT josephmattinglyt thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT campbelljonathand thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT allenjeff thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT ferrisandreae thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT schilskyrichardl thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT danielsondaniel thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT lichtenfeldjleonard thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT houselinda thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT seligwendykd thepromiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT kaufmanhowardl promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT atkinsmichaelb promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT subediprasun promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT wujames promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT chambersjames promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT josephmattinglyt promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT campbelljonathand promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT allenjeff promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT ferrisandreae promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT schilskyrichardl promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT danielsondaniel promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT lichtenfeldjleonard promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT houselinda promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment
AT seligwendykd promiseofimmunooncologyimplicationsfordefiningthevalueofcancertreatment