Cargando…
Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of preoperative pain control using corticosteroid injections in patients with persistent rest pain (RP) before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: A total of 360 patients (374 shoulders) who underwent primary ARCR and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Orthopaedic Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156772 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.192 |
_version_ | 1783419829588328448 |
---|---|
author | Tonotsuka, Hisahiro Sugaya, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Norimasa Kawai, Nobuaki Sugiyama, Hajime Marumo, Keishi |
author_facet | Tonotsuka, Hisahiro Sugaya, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Norimasa Kawai, Nobuaki Sugiyama, Hajime Marumo, Keishi |
author_sort | Tonotsuka, Hisahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of preoperative pain control using corticosteroid injections in patients with persistent rest pain (RP) before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: A total of 360 patients (374 shoulders) who underwent primary ARCR and were followed up for at least 2 years were enrolled. After one-to-one propensity score matching, 266 patients (145 men and 128 women, 273 shoulders) were included in the study. Their mean age was 65.2 ± 7.7 years (range, 42 to 88 years) at the time of surgery. The patients were divided into three groups: those who required several intra-articular or subacromial bursa corticosteroid injections preoperatively for refractory RP (group A+), those in whom RP was resolved preoperatively (group A−), and those who had no RP and did not require any injections (group B). The incidence of postoperative RP and preoperative and final follow-up American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative RP was significantly higher in group A+ (35/91 cases, 38.5%) than in group A− (10/91, 11.0%) and group B (7/91, 7.7%, p < 0.001 for both). The preoperative ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (33.2 ± 14.2) than in group A− (53.9 ± 11.9) and group B (62.3 ± 11.2, p < 0.001 for both), and it was significantly lower in group A− than in group B (p = 0.000). The final follow-up ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (92.1 ± 8.4) than in group A− (97.6 ± 5.4) and group B (99.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in the final follow-up ASES score between group A− and group B (p = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom preoperative RP could be resolved before surgery achieved postoperative outcomes comparable to those in patients who had no RP before surgery, whereas the outcomes in patients with refractory preoperative RP were inferior. The results suggest that preoperative pain control is important in patients undergoing ARCR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6526121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65261212019-06-01 Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? Tonotsuka, Hisahiro Sugaya, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Norimasa Kawai, Nobuaki Sugiyama, Hajime Marumo, Keishi Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of preoperative pain control using corticosteroid injections in patients with persistent rest pain (RP) before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: A total of 360 patients (374 shoulders) who underwent primary ARCR and were followed up for at least 2 years were enrolled. After one-to-one propensity score matching, 266 patients (145 men and 128 women, 273 shoulders) were included in the study. Their mean age was 65.2 ± 7.7 years (range, 42 to 88 years) at the time of surgery. The patients were divided into three groups: those who required several intra-articular or subacromial bursa corticosteroid injections preoperatively for refractory RP (group A+), those in whom RP was resolved preoperatively (group A−), and those who had no RP and did not require any injections (group B). The incidence of postoperative RP and preoperative and final follow-up American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative RP was significantly higher in group A+ (35/91 cases, 38.5%) than in group A− (10/91, 11.0%) and group B (7/91, 7.7%, p < 0.001 for both). The preoperative ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (33.2 ± 14.2) than in group A− (53.9 ± 11.9) and group B (62.3 ± 11.2, p < 0.001 for both), and it was significantly lower in group A− than in group B (p = 0.000). The final follow-up ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (92.1 ± 8.4) than in group A− (97.6 ± 5.4) and group B (99.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in the final follow-up ASES score between group A− and group B (p = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom preoperative RP could be resolved before surgery achieved postoperative outcomes comparable to those in patients who had no RP before surgery, whereas the outcomes in patients with refractory preoperative RP were inferior. The results suggest that preoperative pain control is important in patients undergoing ARCR. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019-06 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6526121/ /pubmed/31156772 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.192 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tonotsuka, Hisahiro Sugaya, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Norimasa Kawai, Nobuaki Sugiyama, Hajime Marumo, Keishi Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? |
title | Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? |
title_full | Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? |
title_fullStr | Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? |
title_short | Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? |
title_sort | preoperative pain control in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: does it matter? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156772 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tonotsukahisahiro preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter AT sugayahiroyuki preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter AT takahashinorimasa preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter AT kawainobuaki preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter AT sugiyamahajime preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter AT marumokeishi preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter |