Cargando…

Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of preoperative pain control using corticosteroid injections in patients with persistent rest pain (RP) before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: A total of 360 patients (374 shoulders) who underwent primary ARCR and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonotsuka, Hisahiro, Sugaya, Hiroyuki, Takahashi, Norimasa, Kawai, Nobuaki, Sugiyama, Hajime, Marumo, Keishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156772
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.192
_version_ 1783419829588328448
author Tonotsuka, Hisahiro
Sugaya, Hiroyuki
Takahashi, Norimasa
Kawai, Nobuaki
Sugiyama, Hajime
Marumo, Keishi
author_facet Tonotsuka, Hisahiro
Sugaya, Hiroyuki
Takahashi, Norimasa
Kawai, Nobuaki
Sugiyama, Hajime
Marumo, Keishi
author_sort Tonotsuka, Hisahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of preoperative pain control using corticosteroid injections in patients with persistent rest pain (RP) before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: A total of 360 patients (374 shoulders) who underwent primary ARCR and were followed up for at least 2 years were enrolled. After one-to-one propensity score matching, 266 patients (145 men and 128 women, 273 shoulders) were included in the study. Their mean age was 65.2 ± 7.7 years (range, 42 to 88 years) at the time of surgery. The patients were divided into three groups: those who required several intra-articular or subacromial bursa corticosteroid injections preoperatively for refractory RP (group A+), those in whom RP was resolved preoperatively (group A−), and those who had no RP and did not require any injections (group B). The incidence of postoperative RP and preoperative and final follow-up American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative RP was significantly higher in group A+ (35/91 cases, 38.5%) than in group A− (10/91, 11.0%) and group B (7/91, 7.7%, p < 0.001 for both). The preoperative ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (33.2 ± 14.2) than in group A− (53.9 ± 11.9) and group B (62.3 ± 11.2, p < 0.001 for both), and it was significantly lower in group A− than in group B (p = 0.000). The final follow-up ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (92.1 ± 8.4) than in group A− (97.6 ± 5.4) and group B (99.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in the final follow-up ASES score between group A− and group B (p = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom preoperative RP could be resolved before surgery achieved postoperative outcomes comparable to those in patients who had no RP before surgery, whereas the outcomes in patients with refractory preoperative RP were inferior. The results suggest that preoperative pain control is important in patients undergoing ARCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6526121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65261212019-06-01 Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter? Tonotsuka, Hisahiro Sugaya, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Norimasa Kawai, Nobuaki Sugiyama, Hajime Marumo, Keishi Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of preoperative pain control using corticosteroid injections in patients with persistent rest pain (RP) before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: A total of 360 patients (374 shoulders) who underwent primary ARCR and were followed up for at least 2 years were enrolled. After one-to-one propensity score matching, 266 patients (145 men and 128 women, 273 shoulders) were included in the study. Their mean age was 65.2 ± 7.7 years (range, 42 to 88 years) at the time of surgery. The patients were divided into three groups: those who required several intra-articular or subacromial bursa corticosteroid injections preoperatively for refractory RP (group A+), those in whom RP was resolved preoperatively (group A−), and those who had no RP and did not require any injections (group B). The incidence of postoperative RP and preoperative and final follow-up American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative RP was significantly higher in group A+ (35/91 cases, 38.5%) than in group A− (10/91, 11.0%) and group B (7/91, 7.7%, p < 0.001 for both). The preoperative ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (33.2 ± 14.2) than in group A− (53.9 ± 11.9) and group B (62.3 ± 11.2, p < 0.001 for both), and it was significantly lower in group A− than in group B (p = 0.000). The final follow-up ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (92.1 ± 8.4) than in group A− (97.6 ± 5.4) and group B (99.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in the final follow-up ASES score between group A− and group B (p = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom preoperative RP could be resolved before surgery achieved postoperative outcomes comparable to those in patients who had no RP before surgery, whereas the outcomes in patients with refractory preoperative RP were inferior. The results suggest that preoperative pain control is important in patients undergoing ARCR. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019-06 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6526121/ /pubmed/31156772 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.192 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tonotsuka, Hisahiro
Sugaya, Hiroyuki
Takahashi, Norimasa
Kawai, Nobuaki
Sugiyama, Hajime
Marumo, Keishi
Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
title Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
title_full Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
title_fullStr Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
title_short Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
title_sort preoperative pain control in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: does it matter?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156772
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.192
work_keys_str_mv AT tonotsukahisahiro preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter
AT sugayahiroyuki preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter
AT takahashinorimasa preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter
AT kawainobuaki preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter
AT sugiyamahajime preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter
AT marumokeishi preoperativepaincontrolinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairdoesitmatter