Cargando…
A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking plate has been increasingly performed for distal radius fractures. Both conventional and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques are widely used to treat distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear which of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Orthopaedic Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.208 |
_version_ | 1783419830281437184 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Dong-Yeong Park, Young-Jin Park, Jin-Sung |
author_facet | Lee, Dong-Yeong Park, Young-Jin Park, Jin-Sung |
author_sort | Lee, Dong-Yeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking plate has been increasingly performed for distal radius fractures. Both conventional and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques are widely used to treat distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear which of the techniques yields better outcomes after surgery for distal radius fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the benefits of conventional and MIPO techniques for distal radius fractures in terms of clinical outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for articles comparing the outcomes of the conventional and MIPO techniques and published up until July 2017. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed based on the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome measures. RESULTS: Four clinical studies were included in the analysis. No significant clinical differences were found between the techniques in clinical hand scoring, grip strength, and range of motion. However, patient satisfaction after surgery was significantly higher in the MIPO group than that in the conventional group (standard mean difference, −0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.79 to −0.29; I(2) = 0%). Furthermore, although there were no significant differences in volar tilt and ulnar variance between the two groups, radial inclination revealed a significant difference between the two groups (radial inclination: weighted mean difference, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.25 to 2.15; I(2) = 19%). CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional and MIPO techniques were effective for patients with distal radius fractures. Despite limited high quality evidence to compare osteosynthesis with a volar locking plate via the conventional and MIPO techniques, the present study showed that the MIPO technique was associated with more favorable patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6526124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65261242019-06-01 A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Lee, Dong-Yeong Park, Young-Jin Park, Jin-Sung Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking plate has been increasingly performed for distal radius fractures. Both conventional and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques are widely used to treat distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear which of the techniques yields better outcomes after surgery for distal radius fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the benefits of conventional and MIPO techniques for distal radius fractures in terms of clinical outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for articles comparing the outcomes of the conventional and MIPO techniques and published up until July 2017. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed based on the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome measures. RESULTS: Four clinical studies were included in the analysis. No significant clinical differences were found between the techniques in clinical hand scoring, grip strength, and range of motion. However, patient satisfaction after surgery was significantly higher in the MIPO group than that in the conventional group (standard mean difference, −0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.79 to −0.29; I(2) = 0%). Furthermore, although there were no significant differences in volar tilt and ulnar variance between the two groups, radial inclination revealed a significant difference between the two groups (radial inclination: weighted mean difference, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.25 to 2.15; I(2) = 19%). CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional and MIPO techniques were effective for patients with distal radius fractures. Despite limited high quality evidence to compare osteosynthesis with a volar locking plate via the conventional and MIPO techniques, the present study showed that the MIPO technique was associated with more favorable patient satisfaction. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019-06 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6526124/ /pubmed/31156774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.208 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Dong-Yeong Park, Young-Jin Park, Jin-Sung A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis |
title | A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis |
title_full | A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis |
title_fullStr | A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis |
title_short | A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis |
title_sort | meta-analysis of studies of volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures: conventional versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leedongyeong ametaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis AT parkyoungjin ametaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis AT parkjinsung ametaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis AT leedongyeong metaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis AT parkyoungjin metaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis AT parkjinsung metaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis |