Cargando…

A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking plate has been increasingly performed for distal radius fractures. Both conventional and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques are widely used to treat distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear which of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Dong-Yeong, Park, Young-Jin, Park, Jin-Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.208
_version_ 1783419830281437184
author Lee, Dong-Yeong
Park, Young-Jin
Park, Jin-Sung
author_facet Lee, Dong-Yeong
Park, Young-Jin
Park, Jin-Sung
author_sort Lee, Dong-Yeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking plate has been increasingly performed for distal radius fractures. Both conventional and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques are widely used to treat distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear which of the techniques yields better outcomes after surgery for distal radius fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the benefits of conventional and MIPO techniques for distal radius fractures in terms of clinical outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for articles comparing the outcomes of the conventional and MIPO techniques and published up until July 2017. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed based on the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome measures. RESULTS: Four clinical studies were included in the analysis. No significant clinical differences were found between the techniques in clinical hand scoring, grip strength, and range of motion. However, patient satisfaction after surgery was significantly higher in the MIPO group than that in the conventional group (standard mean difference, −0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.79 to −0.29; I(2) = 0%). Furthermore, although there were no significant differences in volar tilt and ulnar variance between the two groups, radial inclination revealed a significant difference between the two groups (radial inclination: weighted mean difference, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.25 to 2.15; I(2) = 19%). CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional and MIPO techniques were effective for patients with distal radius fractures. Despite limited high quality evidence to compare osteosynthesis with a volar locking plate via the conventional and MIPO techniques, the present study showed that the MIPO technique was associated with more favorable patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6526124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65261242019-06-01 A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Lee, Dong-Yeong Park, Young-Jin Park, Jin-Sung Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking plate has been increasingly performed for distal radius fractures. Both conventional and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques are widely used to treat distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear which of the techniques yields better outcomes after surgery for distal radius fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the benefits of conventional and MIPO techniques for distal radius fractures in terms of clinical outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for articles comparing the outcomes of the conventional and MIPO techniques and published up until July 2017. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed based on the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome measures. RESULTS: Four clinical studies were included in the analysis. No significant clinical differences were found between the techniques in clinical hand scoring, grip strength, and range of motion. However, patient satisfaction after surgery was significantly higher in the MIPO group than that in the conventional group (standard mean difference, −0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.79 to −0.29; I(2) = 0%). Furthermore, although there were no significant differences in volar tilt and ulnar variance between the two groups, radial inclination revealed a significant difference between the two groups (radial inclination: weighted mean difference, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.25 to 2.15; I(2) = 19%). CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional and MIPO techniques were effective for patients with distal radius fractures. Despite limited high quality evidence to compare osteosynthesis with a volar locking plate via the conventional and MIPO techniques, the present study showed that the MIPO technique was associated with more favorable patient satisfaction. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019-06 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6526124/ /pubmed/31156774 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.208 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Dong-Yeong
Park, Young-Jin
Park, Jin-Sung
A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
title A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
title_full A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
title_fullStr A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
title_short A Meta-analysis of Studies of Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Conventional versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis
title_sort meta-analysis of studies of volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures: conventional versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156774
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.208
work_keys_str_mv AT leedongyeong ametaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis
AT parkyoungjin ametaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis
AT parkjinsung ametaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis
AT leedongyeong metaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis
AT parkyoungjin metaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis
AT parkjinsung metaanalysisofstudiesofvolarlockingplatefixationofdistalradiusfracturesconventionalversusminimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesis