Cargando…

Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

The study question was whether the use of high-viscosity glass-ionomer with chlorhexidine (HVGIC/CHX) for the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) prepared cavities could achieve a higher restoration survival percentage and be more effective for preventing dentine carious lesions adjacent to the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mobarak, Enas H., Shabayek, Mohamed M., El-Deeb, Heba A., Mulder, Jan, Hassan, Fayez M., Van der Sanden, Wil J.M., Frencken, Jo E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.015
_version_ 1783419861866643456
author Mobarak, Enas H.
Shabayek, Mohamed M.
El-Deeb, Heba A.
Mulder, Jan
Hassan, Fayez M.
Van der Sanden, Wil J.M.
Frencken, Jo E.
author_facet Mobarak, Enas H.
Shabayek, Mohamed M.
El-Deeb, Heba A.
Mulder, Jan
Hassan, Fayez M.
Van der Sanden, Wil J.M.
Frencken, Jo E.
author_sort Mobarak, Enas H.
collection PubMed
description The study question was whether the use of high-viscosity glass-ionomer with chlorhexidine (HVGIC/CHX) for the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) prepared cavities could achieve a higher restoration survival percentage and be more effective for preventing dentine carious lesions adjacent to the restoration than the use of HVGIC without CHX. The study followed a split-mouth, quadruple-blind, randomized controlled clinical design and lasted 2 years. Patients with at least two small- to medium-sized occlusal cavities were included. The occlusal cavities were prepared according to the ART method and restored with HVGIC/CHX (test) and HVGIC (control). A replica of all restorations available and digital photographs were fabricated at baseline and after 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 years and evaluated by two examiners using the ART and Federation Dentaire International (FDI) restoration assessment criteria. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to test for significance between the survival percentages. A total of 100 subjects with an average age of 14.4 years participated. According to the ART restoration assessment criteria, the 2-year survival percentages of ART/HVGIC/CHX (96.8%) and ART/HVGIC (94.8%) did not differ significantly and no significant difference was found between the test (97.9%) and control (96.9%) groups according to the FDI restoration assessment criteria. Eight and five occlusal restorations failed according to the ART and FDI restoration criteria, respectively. No dentine carious lesions along the restoration margin were observed. The 2-year survival of ART restorations in both groups was high. The development of carious dentine lesions adjacent to the restoration was not observed in either treatment group. There is no evidence for modifying HVGIC by incorporating chlorhexidine in order to prevent dentine carious lesion development or to improve the survival of ART restorations in occlusal surfaces in permanent teeth. HVGIC without chlorhexidine can be used successfully to restore occlusal ‘ART-prepared’ cavities in permanent teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6526224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65262242019-05-28 Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial Mobarak, Enas H. Shabayek, Mohamed M. El-Deeb, Heba A. Mulder, Jan Hassan, Fayez M. Van der Sanden, Wil J.M. Frencken, Jo E. J Adv Res Original Article The study question was whether the use of high-viscosity glass-ionomer with chlorhexidine (HVGIC/CHX) for the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) prepared cavities could achieve a higher restoration survival percentage and be more effective for preventing dentine carious lesions adjacent to the restoration than the use of HVGIC without CHX. The study followed a split-mouth, quadruple-blind, randomized controlled clinical design and lasted 2 years. Patients with at least two small- to medium-sized occlusal cavities were included. The occlusal cavities were prepared according to the ART method and restored with HVGIC/CHX (test) and HVGIC (control). A replica of all restorations available and digital photographs were fabricated at baseline and after 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 years and evaluated by two examiners using the ART and Federation Dentaire International (FDI) restoration assessment criteria. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to test for significance between the survival percentages. A total of 100 subjects with an average age of 14.4 years participated. According to the ART restoration assessment criteria, the 2-year survival percentages of ART/HVGIC/CHX (96.8%) and ART/HVGIC (94.8%) did not differ significantly and no significant difference was found between the test (97.9%) and control (96.9%) groups according to the FDI restoration assessment criteria. Eight and five occlusal restorations failed according to the ART and FDI restoration criteria, respectively. No dentine carious lesions along the restoration margin were observed. The 2-year survival of ART restorations in both groups was high. The development of carious dentine lesions adjacent to the restoration was not observed in either treatment group. There is no evidence for modifying HVGIC by incorporating chlorhexidine in order to prevent dentine carious lesion development or to improve the survival of ART restorations in occlusal surfaces in permanent teeth. HVGIC without chlorhexidine can be used successfully to restore occlusal ‘ART-prepared’ cavities in permanent teeth. Elsevier 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6526224/ /pubmed/31193330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.015 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Mobarak, Enas H.
Shabayek, Mohamed M.
El-Deeb, Heba A.
Mulder, Jan
Hassan, Fayez M.
Van der Sanden, Wil J.M.
Frencken, Jo E.
Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
title Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Survival of occlusal ART restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: A 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort survival of occlusal art restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer with and without chlorhexidine: a 2-year split-mouth quadruple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.015
work_keys_str_mv AT mobarakenash survivalofocclusalartrestorationsusinghighviscosityglassionomerwithandwithoutchlorhexidinea2yearsplitmouthquadrupleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT shabayekmohamedm survivalofocclusalartrestorationsusinghighviscosityglassionomerwithandwithoutchlorhexidinea2yearsplitmouthquadrupleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT eldeebhebaa survivalofocclusalartrestorationsusinghighviscosityglassionomerwithandwithoutchlorhexidinea2yearsplitmouthquadrupleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT mulderjan survivalofocclusalartrestorationsusinghighviscosityglassionomerwithandwithoutchlorhexidinea2yearsplitmouthquadrupleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT hassanfayezm survivalofocclusalartrestorationsusinghighviscosityglassionomerwithandwithoutchlorhexidinea2yearsplitmouthquadrupleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vandersandenwiljm survivalofocclusalartrestorationsusinghighviscosityglassionomerwithandwithoutchlorhexidinea2yearsplitmouthquadrupleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT frenckenjoe survivalofocclusalartrestorationsusinghighviscosityglassionomerwithandwithoutchlorhexidinea2yearsplitmouthquadrupleblindrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial