Cargando…
Overemphasized “g”
In this paper I argue that the emphasis on “g” has become a hindrance to the study of broadly defined human cognitive abilities. Abilities captured by the first- and second-stratum factors in the Cattel-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory have been neglected. The focus has been on a narrow range of cognitive...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5040033 |
_version_ | 1783419885016055808 |
---|---|
author | Stankov, Lazar |
author_facet | Stankov, Lazar |
author_sort | Stankov, Lazar |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper I argue that the emphasis on “g” has become a hindrance to the study of broadly defined human cognitive abilities. Abilities captured by the first- and second-stratum factors in the Cattel-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory have been neglected. The focus has been on a narrow range of cognitive processes that excludes those common to some sensory modalities and a host of new tasks and constructs that have become available through recent conceptual analyses and technological developments. These new areas have emerged from psychology itself (complex problem solving tasks and emotional intelligence) and from disciplines related to psychology like education and economics (economic games and cognitive biases in decision-making). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6526399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65263992019-05-29 Overemphasized “g” Stankov, Lazar J Intell Commentary In this paper I argue that the emphasis on “g” has become a hindrance to the study of broadly defined human cognitive abilities. Abilities captured by the first- and second-stratum factors in the Cattel-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory have been neglected. The focus has been on a narrow range of cognitive processes that excludes those common to some sensory modalities and a host of new tasks and constructs that have become available through recent conceptual analyses and technological developments. These new areas have emerged from psychology itself (complex problem solving tasks and emotional intelligence) and from disciplines related to psychology like education and economics (economic games and cognitive biases in decision-making). MDPI 2017-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6526399/ /pubmed/31162424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5040033 Text en © 2017 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Stankov, Lazar Overemphasized “g” |
title | Overemphasized “g” |
title_full | Overemphasized “g” |
title_fullStr | Overemphasized “g” |
title_full_unstemmed | Overemphasized “g” |
title_short | Overemphasized “g” |
title_sort | overemphasized “g” |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5040033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stankovlazar overemphasizedg |