Cargando…

Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy

OBJECTIVE: Pre- and postoperative comparative evaluation of neurophysiological tests and clinical trials. Analysis of the diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials (MEP) induced by a magnetic field after supraspinal stimulation. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of electromyography (EM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bryndal, Aleksandra, Wojtysiak, Magdalena, Moskal, Jakub, Lipiec-Kowalska, Joanna, Borowczyk, Martyna, Tańska, Magdalena, Grochulska, Agnieszka, Huber, Juliusz, Majchrzycki, Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4576493
_version_ 1783419909140643840
author Bryndal, Aleksandra
Wojtysiak, Magdalena
Moskal, Jakub
Lipiec-Kowalska, Joanna
Borowczyk, Martyna
Tańska, Magdalena
Grochulska, Agnieszka
Huber, Juliusz
Majchrzycki, Marian
author_facet Bryndal, Aleksandra
Wojtysiak, Magdalena
Moskal, Jakub
Lipiec-Kowalska, Joanna
Borowczyk, Martyna
Tańska, Magdalena
Grochulska, Agnieszka
Huber, Juliusz
Majchrzycki, Marian
author_sort Bryndal, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Pre- and postoperative comparative evaluation of neurophysiological tests and clinical trials. Analysis of the diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials (MEP) induced by a magnetic field after supraspinal stimulation. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of electromyography (EMG) and MEP is achieved. METHODS: EMG, ENG, M-wave, F-wave, and MEP tests were performed on 35 patients with confirmed cervical radiculopathy in pre- and postoperative evaluations. The clinical trial consisted of evaluation of muscle strength, a sensory perception test and evaluation of tendon reflexes and pain severity. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the resting EMG and MEP tests is 24%-67% and 6%-27%, while their specificity is 43%-80% and 86%-100%, respectively. The postoperative evaluation revealed a statistically significant reduction in pain severity (p=0001), an increase in muscle strength in DP (p=0.0431), BB (p=0,0431), and TB (p=0.0272), and improvement of touch sensation in terms of dermatomal innervation in C5 (p=0.0001) and C6 (p=0.0044). CONCLUSIONS: Tests comparing MRI sensitivity to neurophysiological tests show that neuroimaging is more sensitive in diagnostics of patients with cervical radiculopathy; however, clinical neurophysiology tests are more specific in reference to clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6526546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65265462019-06-13 Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy Bryndal, Aleksandra Wojtysiak, Magdalena Moskal, Jakub Lipiec-Kowalska, Joanna Borowczyk, Martyna Tańska, Magdalena Grochulska, Agnieszka Huber, Juliusz Majchrzycki, Marian Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: Pre- and postoperative comparative evaluation of neurophysiological tests and clinical trials. Analysis of the diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials (MEP) induced by a magnetic field after supraspinal stimulation. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of electromyography (EMG) and MEP is achieved. METHODS: EMG, ENG, M-wave, F-wave, and MEP tests were performed on 35 patients with confirmed cervical radiculopathy in pre- and postoperative evaluations. The clinical trial consisted of evaluation of muscle strength, a sensory perception test and evaluation of tendon reflexes and pain severity. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the resting EMG and MEP tests is 24%-67% and 6%-27%, while their specificity is 43%-80% and 86%-100%, respectively. The postoperative evaluation revealed a statistically significant reduction in pain severity (p=0001), an increase in muscle strength in DP (p=0.0431), BB (p=0,0431), and TB (p=0.0272), and improvement of touch sensation in terms of dermatomal innervation in C5 (p=0.0001) and C6 (p=0.0044). CONCLUSIONS: Tests comparing MRI sensitivity to neurophysiological tests show that neuroimaging is more sensitive in diagnostics of patients with cervical radiculopathy; however, clinical neurophysiology tests are more specific in reference to clinical trials. Hindawi 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6526546/ /pubmed/31198784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4576493 Text en Copyright © 2019 Aleksandra Bryndal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bryndal, Aleksandra
Wojtysiak, Magdalena
Moskal, Jakub
Lipiec-Kowalska, Joanna
Borowczyk, Martyna
Tańska, Magdalena
Grochulska, Agnieszka
Huber, Juliusz
Majchrzycki, Marian
Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
title Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
title_full Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
title_fullStr Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
title_short Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
title_sort motor evoked potentials after supraspinal stimulation in pre- and postoperative evaluations of patients with cervical radiculopathy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4576493
work_keys_str_mv AT bryndalaleksandra motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT wojtysiakmagdalena motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT moskaljakub motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT lipieckowalskajoanna motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT borowczykmartyna motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT tanskamagdalena motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT grochulskaagnieszka motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT huberjuliusz motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy
AT majchrzyckimarian motorevokedpotentialsaftersupraspinalstimulationinpreandpostoperativeevaluationsofpatientswithcervicalradiculopathy