Cargando…

Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique

This study explores the potential application of hyperspectral imaging (HSI; 430–1,010 nm) coupled with different linear and nonlinear models for rapid nondestructive evaluation of thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances (TBARS) value in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fillets during 12 days of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoshnoudi‐Nia, Sara, Moosavi‐Nasab, Marzieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1043
_version_ 1783419935486115840
author Khoshnoudi‐Nia, Sara
Moosavi‐Nasab, Marzieh
author_facet Khoshnoudi‐Nia, Sara
Moosavi‐Nasab, Marzieh
author_sort Khoshnoudi‐Nia, Sara
collection PubMed
description This study explores the potential application of hyperspectral imaging (HSI; 430–1,010 nm) coupled with different linear and nonlinear models for rapid nondestructive evaluation of thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances (TBARS) value in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fillets during 12 days of cold storage (4 ± 2°C). HSI data and TBARS value of fillets were obtained in the laboratory. The primary prediction models were established based on linear partial least squares regression (PLSR) and least squares support vector machine (LS‐SVM). In full spectral range, the prediction capability of LS‐SVM ([Formula: see text]  = 0.829; RMSEP = 0.128 mg malondialdehyde [MDA]/kg) was better than PLSR ([Formula: see text]  = 0.748; RMSEP = 0.155 mg MDA/kg) model and LS‐SVM model exhibited satisfactory prediction performance ([Formula: see text]  > 0.82). To simplify the calibration models, a combination of uninformative variable elimination and backward regression (UB) was used as variable selection. Nine wavelengths were selected. Various chemometric analysis methods including linear PLSR and multiple linear regression and nonlinear LS‐SVM and back‐propagation artificial neural network (BP‐ANN) were compared. The simplified models showed better capability than those were built based on the whole dataset in prediction of TBARS values. Moreover, the nonlinear models were preferred over linear models. Among the four chemometric algorithms, the best and weakest models were LS‐SVM and PLSR model, respectively. UB‐LS‐SVM model was the optimal models for predicting TBARS value in rainbow trout fillets ([Formula: see text]  = 0.831; RMSEP = 0.125 mg MDA/kg). The establishing of lipid‐oxidation prediction model in rainbow trout fish was complicated, due to the fluctuations of TBARS values during storage. Therefore, further researches are needed to improve the prediction results and applicability of HIS technique for prediction of TBARS value in rainbow trout fish.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6526668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65266682019-05-28 Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique Khoshnoudi‐Nia, Sara Moosavi‐Nasab, Marzieh Food Sci Nutr Original Research This study explores the potential application of hyperspectral imaging (HSI; 430–1,010 nm) coupled with different linear and nonlinear models for rapid nondestructive evaluation of thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances (TBARS) value in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fillets during 12 days of cold storage (4 ± 2°C). HSI data and TBARS value of fillets were obtained in the laboratory. The primary prediction models were established based on linear partial least squares regression (PLSR) and least squares support vector machine (LS‐SVM). In full spectral range, the prediction capability of LS‐SVM ([Formula: see text]  = 0.829; RMSEP = 0.128 mg malondialdehyde [MDA]/kg) was better than PLSR ([Formula: see text]  = 0.748; RMSEP = 0.155 mg MDA/kg) model and LS‐SVM model exhibited satisfactory prediction performance ([Formula: see text]  > 0.82). To simplify the calibration models, a combination of uninformative variable elimination and backward regression (UB) was used as variable selection. Nine wavelengths were selected. Various chemometric analysis methods including linear PLSR and multiple linear regression and nonlinear LS‐SVM and back‐propagation artificial neural network (BP‐ANN) were compared. The simplified models showed better capability than those were built based on the whole dataset in prediction of TBARS values. Moreover, the nonlinear models were preferred over linear models. Among the four chemometric algorithms, the best and weakest models were LS‐SVM and PLSR model, respectively. UB‐LS‐SVM model was the optimal models for predicting TBARS value in rainbow trout fillets ([Formula: see text]  = 0.831; RMSEP = 0.125 mg MDA/kg). The establishing of lipid‐oxidation prediction model in rainbow trout fish was complicated, due to the fluctuations of TBARS values during storage. Therefore, further researches are needed to improve the prediction results and applicability of HIS technique for prediction of TBARS value in rainbow trout fish. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6526668/ /pubmed/31139402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1043 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Khoshnoudi‐Nia, Sara
Moosavi‐Nasab, Marzieh
Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique
title Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique
title_full Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique
title_fullStr Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique
title_short Comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique
title_sort comparison of various chemometric analysis for rapid prediction of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in rainbow trout fillets by hyperspectral imaging technique
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1043
work_keys_str_mv AT khoshnoudiniasara comparisonofvariouschemometricanalysisforrapidpredictionofthiobarbituricacidreactivesubstancesinrainbowtroutfilletsbyhyperspectralimagingtechnique
AT moosavinasabmarzieh comparisonofvariouschemometricanalysisforrapidpredictionofthiobarbituricacidreactivesubstancesinrainbowtroutfilletsbyhyperspectralimagingtechnique