Cargando…

Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin

This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte, Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge, Abdel Massih, Marleen, Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert, Assogba, Mahunan François, Covo, Melvina, Scippo, Marie‐Louise, Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph, Anihouvi, Victor, Mahillon, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1030
Descripción
Sumario:This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from different processing sites and markets for microbial characterization using standard methods. The aerobic mesophilic bacteria (AMB) density varied from 2.9 to 9.5 Log(10) CFU/g. Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, yeasts, and molds were present in 63.9%, 27.8%, 55.6%, 58.3%, 61.1%, and 77.8% of samples, respectively, while no Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus were found. The majority (66.7%) of SF samples and 22.2% of SDF samples were not compliant with the acceptable limit of <7.0 Log(10) CFU/g recommended by the Health Protection Agency for AMB, whereas the Enterobacteriaceae counts exceeded the recommended level of 4.0 Log(10) CFU/g for 50% of SF and 5.6% of SDF samples. Likewise, 38.9% of SF samples were not compliant for E. coli. Microbiological hazard analysis of practices allowed to identify the sensitive steps where hygiene measures need to be emphasized for an improved quality control.