Cargando…

Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin

This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte, Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge, Abdel Massih, Marleen, Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert, Assogba, Mahunan François, Covo, Melvina, Scippo, Marie‐Louise, Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph, Anihouvi, Victor, Mahillon, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1030
_version_ 1783419936636403712
author Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte
Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge
Abdel Massih, Marleen
Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert
Assogba, Mahunan François
Covo, Melvina
Scippo, Marie‐Louise
Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph
Anihouvi, Victor
Mahillon, Jacques
author_facet Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte
Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge
Abdel Massih, Marleen
Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert
Assogba, Mahunan François
Covo, Melvina
Scippo, Marie‐Louise
Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph
Anihouvi, Victor
Mahillon, Jacques
author_sort Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from different processing sites and markets for microbial characterization using standard methods. The aerobic mesophilic bacteria (AMB) density varied from 2.9 to 9.5 Log(10) CFU/g. Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, yeasts, and molds were present in 63.9%, 27.8%, 55.6%, 58.3%, 61.1%, and 77.8% of samples, respectively, while no Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus were found. The majority (66.7%) of SF samples and 22.2% of SDF samples were not compliant with the acceptable limit of <7.0 Log(10) CFU/g recommended by the Health Protection Agency for AMB, whereas the Enterobacteriaceae counts exceeded the recommended level of 4.0 Log(10) CFU/g for 50% of SF and 5.6% of SDF samples. Likewise, 38.9% of SF samples were not compliant for E. coli. Microbiological hazard analysis of practices allowed to identify the sensitive steps where hygiene measures need to be emphasized for an improved quality control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6526674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65266742019-05-28 Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge Abdel Massih, Marleen Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert Assogba, Mahunan François Covo, Melvina Scippo, Marie‐Louise Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph Anihouvi, Victor Mahillon, Jacques Food Sci Nutr Original Research This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from different processing sites and markets for microbial characterization using standard methods. The aerobic mesophilic bacteria (AMB) density varied from 2.9 to 9.5 Log(10) CFU/g. Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, yeasts, and molds were present in 63.9%, 27.8%, 55.6%, 58.3%, 61.1%, and 77.8% of samples, respectively, while no Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus were found. The majority (66.7%) of SF samples and 22.2% of SDF samples were not compliant with the acceptable limit of <7.0 Log(10) CFU/g recommended by the Health Protection Agency for AMB, whereas the Enterobacteriaceae counts exceeded the recommended level of 4.0 Log(10) CFU/g for 50% of SF and 5.6% of SDF samples. Likewise, 38.9% of SF samples were not compliant for E. coli. Microbiological hazard analysis of practices allowed to identify the sensitive steps where hygiene measures need to be emphasized for an improved quality control. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6526674/ /pubmed/31139396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1030 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte
Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge
Abdel Massih, Marleen
Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert
Assogba, Mahunan François
Covo, Melvina
Scippo, Marie‐Louise
Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph
Anihouvi, Victor
Mahillon, Jacques
Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin
title Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin
title_full Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin
title_fullStr Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin
title_full_unstemmed Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin
title_short Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin
title_sort microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in benin
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1030
work_keys_str_mv AT anihouvidonagildashippolyte microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT kpoclouyenoukounmeeuloge microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT abdelmassihmarleen microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT ikoafeogouyomherbert microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT assogbamahunanfrancois microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT covomelvina microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT scippomarielouise microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT hounhouigandjidjohojoseph microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT anihouvivictor microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin
AT mahillonjacques microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin