Cargando…
Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin
This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1030 |
_version_ | 1783419936636403712 |
---|---|
author | Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge Abdel Massih, Marleen Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert Assogba, Mahunan François Covo, Melvina Scippo, Marie‐Louise Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph Anihouvi, Victor Mahillon, Jacques |
author_facet | Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge Abdel Massih, Marleen Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert Assogba, Mahunan François Covo, Melvina Scippo, Marie‐Louise Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph Anihouvi, Victor Mahillon, Jacques |
author_sort | Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from different processing sites and markets for microbial characterization using standard methods. The aerobic mesophilic bacteria (AMB) density varied from 2.9 to 9.5 Log(10) CFU/g. Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, yeasts, and molds were present in 63.9%, 27.8%, 55.6%, 58.3%, 61.1%, and 77.8% of samples, respectively, while no Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus were found. The majority (66.7%) of SF samples and 22.2% of SDF samples were not compliant with the acceptable limit of <7.0 Log(10) CFU/g recommended by the Health Protection Agency for AMB, whereas the Enterobacteriaceae counts exceeded the recommended level of 4.0 Log(10) CFU/g for 50% of SF and 5.6% of SDF samples. Likewise, 38.9% of SF samples were not compliant for E. coli. Microbiological hazard analysis of practices allowed to identify the sensitive steps where hygiene measures need to be emphasized for an improved quality control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6526674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65266742019-05-28 Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge Abdel Massih, Marleen Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert Assogba, Mahunan François Covo, Melvina Scippo, Marie‐Louise Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph Anihouvi, Victor Mahillon, Jacques Food Sci Nutr Original Research This study aimed to assess the microbiological status of smoked fish (SF) and smoked–dried fish (SDF) processed in Benin, and to identify the contamination factors associated with these products. A total of 66 fish samples, including fresh fish and processed fish, were randomly collected from different processing sites and markets for microbial characterization using standard methods. The aerobic mesophilic bacteria (AMB) density varied from 2.9 to 9.5 Log(10) CFU/g. Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, yeasts, and molds were present in 63.9%, 27.8%, 55.6%, 58.3%, 61.1%, and 77.8% of samples, respectively, while no Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus were found. The majority (66.7%) of SF samples and 22.2% of SDF samples were not compliant with the acceptable limit of <7.0 Log(10) CFU/g recommended by the Health Protection Agency for AMB, whereas the Enterobacteriaceae counts exceeded the recommended level of 4.0 Log(10) CFU/g for 50% of SF and 5.6% of SDF samples. Likewise, 38.9% of SF samples were not compliant for E. coli. Microbiological hazard analysis of practices allowed to identify the sensitive steps where hygiene measures need to be emphasized for an improved quality control. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6526674/ /pubmed/31139396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1030 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Anihouvi, Dona Gildas Hippolyte Kpoclou, Yénoukounmè Euloge Abdel Massih, Marleen Iko Afé, Ogouyôm Herbert Assogba, Mahunan François Covo, Melvina Scippo, Marie‐Louise Hounhouigan, Djidjoho Joseph Anihouvi, Victor Mahillon, Jacques Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin |
title | Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin |
title_full | Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin |
title_fullStr | Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin |
title_short | Microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in Benin |
title_sort | microbiological characteristics of smoked and smoked–dried fish processed in benin |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anihouvidonagildashippolyte microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT kpoclouyenoukounmeeuloge microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT abdelmassihmarleen microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT ikoafeogouyomherbert microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT assogbamahunanfrancois microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT covomelvina microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT scippomarielouise microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT hounhouigandjidjohojoseph microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT anihouvivictor microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin AT mahillonjacques microbiologicalcharacteristicsofsmokedandsmokeddriedfishprocessedinbenin |