Cargando…

Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients treated with Jones Jig appliance or with maxillary first premolar extractions. METHODS: The sample consisted of 88 lateral cephalograms of 44 patients, divided into two groups. Grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pupulim, Daniela Cubas, Henriques, José Fernando Castanha, Janson, Guilherme, Henriques, Fernanda Pinelli, Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore, Garib, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31116288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.2.056-065.oar
_version_ 1783419951273476096
author Pupulim, Daniela Cubas
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Janson, Guilherme
Henriques, Fernanda Pinelli
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Garib, Daniela
author_facet Pupulim, Daniela Cubas
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Janson, Guilherme
Henriques, Fernanda Pinelli
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Garib, Daniela
author_sort Pupulim, Daniela Cubas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients treated with Jones Jig appliance or with maxillary first premolar extractions. METHODS: The sample consisted of 88 lateral cephalograms of 44 patients, divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 21 patients treated with Jones Jig appliance, with a mean initial age of 12.88 ± 1.23 years and final mean age of 17.18 ± 1.37 years, and a mean treatment time of 4.29 years. Group 2 comprised 23 patients treated with maxillary first premolar extractions, with a mean initial age of 13.59 ± 1.91 years and mean final age of 16.39 ± 1.97 years, and a mean treatment time of 2.8 years. Intergroup treatment changes were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Class II correction in G2 (maxillary first premolar extractions) presented significantly greater maxillary retrusion, reduction of anteroposterior apical base discrepancy, smaller increase in the lower anterior face height and significantly greater overjet reduction than G1 (Jones Jig). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with maxillary first premolar extractions produced greater overjet reduction, but the two treatment protocols produced similar changes in the soft tissue profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6526763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65267632019-05-29 Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions Pupulim, Daniela Cubas Henriques, José Fernando Castanha Janson, Guilherme Henriques, Fernanda Pinelli Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore Garib, Daniela Dental Press J Orthod Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients treated with Jones Jig appliance or with maxillary first premolar extractions. METHODS: The sample consisted of 88 lateral cephalograms of 44 patients, divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 21 patients treated with Jones Jig appliance, with a mean initial age of 12.88 ± 1.23 years and final mean age of 17.18 ± 1.37 years, and a mean treatment time of 4.29 years. Group 2 comprised 23 patients treated with maxillary first premolar extractions, with a mean initial age of 13.59 ± 1.91 years and mean final age of 16.39 ± 1.97 years, and a mean treatment time of 2.8 years. Intergroup treatment changes were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Class II correction in G2 (maxillary first premolar extractions) presented significantly greater maxillary retrusion, reduction of anteroposterior apical base discrepancy, smaller increase in the lower anterior face height and significantly greater overjet reduction than G1 (Jones Jig). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with maxillary first premolar extractions produced greater overjet reduction, but the two treatment protocols produced similar changes in the soft tissue profile. Dental Press International 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6526763/ /pubmed/31116288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.2.056-065.oar Text en © 2019 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pupulim, Daniela Cubas
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Janson, Guilherme
Henriques, Fernanda Pinelli
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Garib, Daniela
Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions
title Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions
title_full Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions
title_fullStr Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions
title_short Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions
title_sort comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of class ii malocclusion treatment with jones jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31116288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.2.056-065.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT pupulimdanielacubas comparisonofdentoskeletalandsofttissueeffectsofclassiimalocclusiontreatmentwithjonesjigapplianceandwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractions
AT henriquesjosefernandocastanha comparisonofdentoskeletalandsofttissueeffectsofclassiimalocclusiontreatmentwithjonesjigapplianceandwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractions
AT jansonguilherme comparisonofdentoskeletalandsofttissueeffectsofclassiimalocclusiontreatmentwithjonesjigapplianceandwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractions
AT henriquesfernandapinelli comparisonofdentoskeletalandsofttissueeffectsofclassiimalocclusiontreatmentwithjonesjigapplianceandwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractions
AT freitaskarinamariasalvatore comparisonofdentoskeletalandsofttissueeffectsofclassiimalocclusiontreatmentwithjonesjigapplianceandwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractions
AT garibdaniela comparisonofdentoskeletalandsofttissueeffectsofclassiimalocclusiontreatmentwithjonesjigapplianceandwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractions