Cargando…

First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression

PURPOSE: In the randomized phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure vs gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We report post hoc analyse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuler, Martin, Tan, Eng-Huat, O’Byrne, Kenneth, Zhang, Li, Boyer, Michael, Mok, Tony, Hirsh, Vera, Yang, James Chih-Hsin, Lee, Ki Hyeong, Lu, Shun, Shi, Yuankai, Kim, Sang-We, Laskin, Janessa, Kim, Dong-Wan, Arvis, Catherine Dubos, Kölbeck, Karl, Massey, Dan, Märten, Angela, Paz-Ares, Luis, Park, Keunchil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x
_version_ 1783420039208108032
author Schuler, Martin
Tan, Eng-Huat
O’Byrne, Kenneth
Zhang, Li
Boyer, Michael
Mok, Tony
Hirsh, Vera
Yang, James Chih-Hsin
Lee, Ki Hyeong
Lu, Shun
Shi, Yuankai
Kim, Sang-We
Laskin, Janessa
Kim, Dong-Wan
Arvis, Catherine Dubos
Kölbeck, Karl
Massey, Dan
Märten, Angela
Paz-Ares, Luis
Park, Keunchil
author_facet Schuler, Martin
Tan, Eng-Huat
O’Byrne, Kenneth
Zhang, Li
Boyer, Michael
Mok, Tony
Hirsh, Vera
Yang, James Chih-Hsin
Lee, Ki Hyeong
Lu, Shun
Shi, Yuankai
Kim, Sang-We
Laskin, Janessa
Kim, Dong-Wan
Arvis, Catherine Dubos
Kölbeck, Karl
Massey, Dan
Märten, Angela
Paz-Ares, Luis
Park, Keunchil
author_sort Schuler, Martin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In the randomized phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure vs gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We report post hoc analyses of tolerability-guided dose adjustment for afatinib and summarize the clinical characteristics of patients who continued afatinib/gefitinib beyond initial radiological progression in LUX-Lung 7. METHODS: Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day or gefitinib 250 mg/day until investigator-assessed progression or beyond if beneficial. In case of selected treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the afatinib dose could be reduced by 10-mg decrements to minimum 20 mg (only dose interruptions were permitted with gefitinib). RESULTS: All randomized patients were treated (afatinib, n = 160; gefitinib, n = 159). Sixty-three patients had afatinib dose reduction (< 40 mg/day; 47 within first 6 months). Dose reduction decreased TRAE incidence/severity (before vs after; all grade/grade 3: 100.0%/63.5% vs 90.5%/23.8%). There was no evidence of significant difference in PFS for patients who received < 40 mg/day vs ≥ 40 mg/day for the first 6 months [median: 12.8 vs 11.0 months; hazard ratio 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.90–2.00)]. Twenty-four and 26 patients continued afatinib and gefitinib, respectively, beyond progression in target lesions; median time from nadir of target lesion diameters to initial progression was 6.7 months and 5.6 months. Of these patients, ~ 70% had objective response or non-complete response/non-progressive disease in non-target lesions at initial progression. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-defined dose adjustment of afatinib may allow patients to remain on treatment longer, maximizing clinical benefit even in the presence of radiological progression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6527523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65275232019-06-07 First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression Schuler, Martin Tan, Eng-Huat O’Byrne, Kenneth Zhang, Li Boyer, Michael Mok, Tony Hirsh, Vera Yang, James Chih-Hsin Lee, Ki Hyeong Lu, Shun Shi, Yuankai Kim, Sang-We Laskin, Janessa Kim, Dong-Wan Arvis, Catherine Dubos Kölbeck, Karl Massey, Dan Märten, Angela Paz-Ares, Luis Park, Keunchil J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article - Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: In the randomized phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure vs gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We report post hoc analyses of tolerability-guided dose adjustment for afatinib and summarize the clinical characteristics of patients who continued afatinib/gefitinib beyond initial radiological progression in LUX-Lung 7. METHODS: Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day or gefitinib 250 mg/day until investigator-assessed progression or beyond if beneficial. In case of selected treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the afatinib dose could be reduced by 10-mg decrements to minimum 20 mg (only dose interruptions were permitted with gefitinib). RESULTS: All randomized patients were treated (afatinib, n = 160; gefitinib, n = 159). Sixty-three patients had afatinib dose reduction (< 40 mg/day; 47 within first 6 months). Dose reduction decreased TRAE incidence/severity (before vs after; all grade/grade 3: 100.0%/63.5% vs 90.5%/23.8%). There was no evidence of significant difference in PFS for patients who received < 40 mg/day vs ≥ 40 mg/day for the first 6 months [median: 12.8 vs 11.0 months; hazard ratio 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.90–2.00)]. Twenty-four and 26 patients continued afatinib and gefitinib, respectively, beyond progression in target lesions; median time from nadir of target lesion diameters to initial progression was 6.7 months and 5.6 months. Of these patients, ~ 70% had objective response or non-complete response/non-progressive disease in non-target lesions at initial progression. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-defined dose adjustment of afatinib may allow patients to remain on treatment longer, maximizing clinical benefit even in the presence of radiological progression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6527523/ /pubmed/30783814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article - Clinical Oncology
Schuler, Martin
Tan, Eng-Huat
O’Byrne, Kenneth
Zhang, Li
Boyer, Michael
Mok, Tony
Hirsh, Vera
Yang, James Chih-Hsin
Lee, Ki Hyeong
Lu, Shun
Shi, Yuankai
Kim, Sang-We
Laskin, Janessa
Kim, Dong-Wan
Arvis, Catherine Dubos
Kölbeck, Karl
Massey, Dan
Märten, Angela
Paz-Ares, Luis
Park, Keunchil
First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
title First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
title_full First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
title_fullStr First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
title_full_unstemmed First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
title_short First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
title_sort first-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with egfr mutation-positive nsclc (lux-lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
topic Original Article - Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x
work_keys_str_mv AT schulermartin firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT tanenghuat firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT obyrnekenneth firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT zhangli firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT boyermichael firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT moktony firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT hirshvera firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT yangjameschihhsin firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT leekihyeong firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT lushun firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT shiyuankai firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT kimsangwe firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT laskinjanessa firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT kimdongwan firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT arviscatherinedubos firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT kolbeckkarl firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT masseydan firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT martenangela firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT pazaresluis firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression
AT parkkeunchil firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression