Cargando…
First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression
PURPOSE: In the randomized phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure vs gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We report post hoc analyse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x |
_version_ | 1783420039208108032 |
---|---|
author | Schuler, Martin Tan, Eng-Huat O’Byrne, Kenneth Zhang, Li Boyer, Michael Mok, Tony Hirsh, Vera Yang, James Chih-Hsin Lee, Ki Hyeong Lu, Shun Shi, Yuankai Kim, Sang-We Laskin, Janessa Kim, Dong-Wan Arvis, Catherine Dubos Kölbeck, Karl Massey, Dan Märten, Angela Paz-Ares, Luis Park, Keunchil |
author_facet | Schuler, Martin Tan, Eng-Huat O’Byrne, Kenneth Zhang, Li Boyer, Michael Mok, Tony Hirsh, Vera Yang, James Chih-Hsin Lee, Ki Hyeong Lu, Shun Shi, Yuankai Kim, Sang-We Laskin, Janessa Kim, Dong-Wan Arvis, Catherine Dubos Kölbeck, Karl Massey, Dan Märten, Angela Paz-Ares, Luis Park, Keunchil |
author_sort | Schuler, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In the randomized phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure vs gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We report post hoc analyses of tolerability-guided dose adjustment for afatinib and summarize the clinical characteristics of patients who continued afatinib/gefitinib beyond initial radiological progression in LUX-Lung 7. METHODS: Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day or gefitinib 250 mg/day until investigator-assessed progression or beyond if beneficial. In case of selected treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the afatinib dose could be reduced by 10-mg decrements to minimum 20 mg (only dose interruptions were permitted with gefitinib). RESULTS: All randomized patients were treated (afatinib, n = 160; gefitinib, n = 159). Sixty-three patients had afatinib dose reduction (< 40 mg/day; 47 within first 6 months). Dose reduction decreased TRAE incidence/severity (before vs after; all grade/grade 3: 100.0%/63.5% vs 90.5%/23.8%). There was no evidence of significant difference in PFS for patients who received < 40 mg/day vs ≥ 40 mg/day for the first 6 months [median: 12.8 vs 11.0 months; hazard ratio 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.90–2.00)]. Twenty-four and 26 patients continued afatinib and gefitinib, respectively, beyond progression in target lesions; median time from nadir of target lesion diameters to initial progression was 6.7 months and 5.6 months. Of these patients, ~ 70% had objective response or non-complete response/non-progressive disease in non-target lesions at initial progression. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-defined dose adjustment of afatinib may allow patients to remain on treatment longer, maximizing clinical benefit even in the presence of radiological progression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6527523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65275232019-06-07 First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression Schuler, Martin Tan, Eng-Huat O’Byrne, Kenneth Zhang, Li Boyer, Michael Mok, Tony Hirsh, Vera Yang, James Chih-Hsin Lee, Ki Hyeong Lu, Shun Shi, Yuankai Kim, Sang-We Laskin, Janessa Kim, Dong-Wan Arvis, Catherine Dubos Kölbeck, Karl Massey, Dan Märten, Angela Paz-Ares, Luis Park, Keunchil J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article - Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: In the randomized phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure vs gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We report post hoc analyses of tolerability-guided dose adjustment for afatinib and summarize the clinical characteristics of patients who continued afatinib/gefitinib beyond initial radiological progression in LUX-Lung 7. METHODS: Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day or gefitinib 250 mg/day until investigator-assessed progression or beyond if beneficial. In case of selected treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the afatinib dose could be reduced by 10-mg decrements to minimum 20 mg (only dose interruptions were permitted with gefitinib). RESULTS: All randomized patients were treated (afatinib, n = 160; gefitinib, n = 159). Sixty-three patients had afatinib dose reduction (< 40 mg/day; 47 within first 6 months). Dose reduction decreased TRAE incidence/severity (before vs after; all grade/grade 3: 100.0%/63.5% vs 90.5%/23.8%). There was no evidence of significant difference in PFS for patients who received < 40 mg/day vs ≥ 40 mg/day for the first 6 months [median: 12.8 vs 11.0 months; hazard ratio 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.90–2.00)]. Twenty-four and 26 patients continued afatinib and gefitinib, respectively, beyond progression in target lesions; median time from nadir of target lesion diameters to initial progression was 6.7 months and 5.6 months. Of these patients, ~ 70% had objective response or non-complete response/non-progressive disease in non-target lesions at initial progression. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-defined dose adjustment of afatinib may allow patients to remain on treatment longer, maximizing clinical benefit even in the presence of radiological progression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6527523/ /pubmed/30783814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Clinical Oncology Schuler, Martin Tan, Eng-Huat O’Byrne, Kenneth Zhang, Li Boyer, Michael Mok, Tony Hirsh, Vera Yang, James Chih-Hsin Lee, Ki Hyeong Lu, Shun Shi, Yuankai Kim, Sang-We Laskin, Janessa Kim, Dong-Wan Arvis, Catherine Dubos Kölbeck, Karl Massey, Dan Märten, Angela Paz-Ares, Luis Park, Keunchil First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression |
title | First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression |
title_full | First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression |
title_fullStr | First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression |
title_full_unstemmed | First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression |
title_short | First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression |
title_sort | first-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with egfr mutation-positive nsclc (lux-lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression |
topic | Original Article - Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schulermartin firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT tanenghuat firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT obyrnekenneth firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT zhangli firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT boyermichael firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT moktony firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT hirshvera firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT yangjameschihhsin firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT leekihyeong firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT lushun firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT shiyuankai firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT kimsangwe firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT laskinjanessa firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT kimdongwan firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT arviscatherinedubos firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT kolbeckkarl firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT masseydan firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT martenangela firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT pazaresluis firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression AT parkkeunchil firstlineafatinibvsgefitinibforpatientswithegfrmutationpositivensclcluxlung7impactofafatinibdoseadjustmentandanalysisofmodeofinitialprogressionforpatientswhocontinuedtreatmentbeyondprogression |