Cargando…

National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg

OBJECTIVES: In Luxembourg, the frequency of CT and MRI examinations per inhabitant is among the highest in Europe. A national audit was conducted to evaluate the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations according to the national referral guidelines for medical imaging. METHODS: Three hundred and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouëtté, Aurélien, Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra, Ducou Le Pointe, Hubert, Grieten, Martijn, de Kerviler, Eric, Rausin, Léon, Bouëtté, Jean-Christophe, Majerus, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31111303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0731-9
_version_ 1783420070493421568
author Bouëtté, Aurélien
Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra
Ducou Le Pointe, Hubert
Grieten, Martijn
de Kerviler, Eric
Rausin, Léon
Bouëtté, Jean-Christophe
Majerus, Patrick
author_facet Bouëtté, Aurélien
Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra
Ducou Le Pointe, Hubert
Grieten, Martijn
de Kerviler, Eric
Rausin, Léon
Bouëtté, Jean-Christophe
Majerus, Patrick
author_sort Bouëtté, Aurélien
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In Luxembourg, the frequency of CT and MRI examinations per inhabitant is among the highest in Europe. A national audit was conducted to evaluate the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations according to the national referral guidelines for medical imaging. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-eight CT and 330 MRI requests corresponding to already performed examinations were provided by all radiology departments in Luxembourg. Four external radiologists evaluated the clinical elements for justification present in each request. They consensually assessed the appropriateness of each requested examination with regard to the national referral guidelines and their clinical experience. RESULTS: The appropriateness rate (AR) was higher for MRI requests than for CT requests (79% vs. 61%; p < 0.001). AR was higher for requests referred by medical specialists rather than by general practitioners, both for CT requests (70% vs. 37%; p < 0.001) and MRI requests (83% vs. 64%; p = 0.002). For CT, AR was higher when the requests concerned paediatric rather than adult patients (82% vs. 58%; p < 0.001), when the radiology departments were equipped with both CT and MRI units rather than with only CT units (65% vs. 47%, p = 0.004) and when the requests concerned head-neck (79%), chest (77%) and chest-abdominal-pelvic (81%) areas rather than spinal (28%), extremity (51%) and abdominal-pelvic (63%) areas (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The appropriateness of CT and MRI in Luxembourg is not satisfactory and collective efforts to improve should be continued. The focus should be on general practitioners and on spinal CT examinations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13244-019-0731-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6527721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65277212019-05-21 National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg Bouëtté, Aurélien Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra Ducou Le Pointe, Hubert Grieten, Martijn de Kerviler, Eric Rausin, Léon Bouëtté, Jean-Christophe Majerus, Patrick Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: In Luxembourg, the frequency of CT and MRI examinations per inhabitant is among the highest in Europe. A national audit was conducted to evaluate the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations according to the national referral guidelines for medical imaging. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-eight CT and 330 MRI requests corresponding to already performed examinations were provided by all radiology departments in Luxembourg. Four external radiologists evaluated the clinical elements for justification present in each request. They consensually assessed the appropriateness of each requested examination with regard to the national referral guidelines and their clinical experience. RESULTS: The appropriateness rate (AR) was higher for MRI requests than for CT requests (79% vs. 61%; p < 0.001). AR was higher for requests referred by medical specialists rather than by general practitioners, both for CT requests (70% vs. 37%; p < 0.001) and MRI requests (83% vs. 64%; p = 0.002). For CT, AR was higher when the requests concerned paediatric rather than adult patients (82% vs. 58%; p < 0.001), when the radiology departments were equipped with both CT and MRI units rather than with only CT units (65% vs. 47%, p = 0.004) and when the requests concerned head-neck (79%), chest (77%) and chest-abdominal-pelvic (81%) areas rather than spinal (28%), extremity (51%) and abdominal-pelvic (63%) areas (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The appropriateness of CT and MRI in Luxembourg is not satisfactory and collective efforts to improve should be continued. The focus should be on general practitioners and on spinal CT examinations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13244-019-0731-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6527721/ /pubmed/31111303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0731-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bouëtté, Aurélien
Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra
Ducou Le Pointe, Hubert
Grieten, Martijn
de Kerviler, Eric
Rausin, Léon
Bouëtté, Jean-Christophe
Majerus, Patrick
National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg
title National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg
title_full National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg
title_fullStr National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg
title_full_unstemmed National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg
title_short National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg
title_sort national audit on the appropriateness of ct and mri examinations in luxembourg
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31111303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0731-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bouetteaurelien nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg
AT karoussouschreineralexandra nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg
AT ducoulepointehubert nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg
AT grietenmartijn nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg
AT dekervilereric nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg
AT rausinleon nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg
AT bouettejeanchristophe nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg
AT majeruspatrick nationalauditontheappropriatenessofctandmriexaminationsinluxembourg