Cargando…

Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications

Over the last 30 years, robotic surgery has evolved into the preferred surgical approach for many operative cases. Robotics has been associated with lower pain scales, shorter hospitalizations, and improved cosmesis (1, 2). However, its acceptance in pediatrics have been hampered by longer operative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kim, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00187
_version_ 1783420085610741760
author Kim, Christina
author_facet Kim, Christina
author_sort Kim, Christina
collection PubMed
description Over the last 30 years, robotic surgery has evolved into the preferred surgical approach for many operative cases. Robotics has been associated with lower pain scales, shorter hospitalizations, and improved cosmesis (1, 2). However, its acceptance in pediatrics have been hampered by longer operative times, smaller working space, and limited fine surgical instruments. Many find these challenges even more pronounced when performing robotic surgery in infants (i.e., children <1 year old). Although the data in infants is less robust, many studies have shown benefits similar to the adult population. Specifically, multiple reports of robotic surgery in infants have shown lower postoperative analgesic use. Additionally, hospital stays are shorter, which may lead to quicker return to work for parents and guardians. Multiple reports have shown low complication rates of robotic surgery in infants. When complications have occurred, they are usually Clavien Grade 1 and 2, with occasional grade 3. Often the complications are not from the robotic technique, but are linked to other factors such as the ureteral stents (3, 4). Most importantly, the success rates of surgery are comparable to open surgery. This chapter will review indications for the most common urologic robotic surgeries performed in infants. Also, we will review reported results and complications of robotic surgery in children, with specific attention to the infant population. However, data focused only on infants is limited. Many studies have some infant patients, but their results are often mixed with all pediatric patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6527797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65277972019-05-28 Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications Kim, Christina Front Pediatr Pediatrics Over the last 30 years, robotic surgery has evolved into the preferred surgical approach for many operative cases. Robotics has been associated with lower pain scales, shorter hospitalizations, and improved cosmesis (1, 2). However, its acceptance in pediatrics have been hampered by longer operative times, smaller working space, and limited fine surgical instruments. Many find these challenges even more pronounced when performing robotic surgery in infants (i.e., children <1 year old). Although the data in infants is less robust, many studies have shown benefits similar to the adult population. Specifically, multiple reports of robotic surgery in infants have shown lower postoperative analgesic use. Additionally, hospital stays are shorter, which may lead to quicker return to work for parents and guardians. Multiple reports have shown low complication rates of robotic surgery in infants. When complications have occurred, they are usually Clavien Grade 1 and 2, with occasional grade 3. Often the complications are not from the robotic technique, but are linked to other factors such as the ureteral stents (3, 4). Most importantly, the success rates of surgery are comparable to open surgery. This chapter will review indications for the most common urologic robotic surgeries performed in infants. Also, we will review reported results and complications of robotic surgery in children, with specific attention to the infant population. However, data focused only on infants is limited. Many studies have some infant patients, but their results are often mixed with all pediatric patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6527797/ /pubmed/31139606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00187 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Kim, Christina
Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications
title Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications
title_full Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications
title_fullStr Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications
title_short Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications
title_sort robotic urologic surgery in infants: results and complications
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00187
work_keys_str_mv AT kimchristina roboticurologicsurgeryininfantsresultsandcomplications