Cargando…

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION: The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was mainly developed for the purposes of prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, its widespread use suggests that it may play a role in a preoperative workup prior to endoscopic radical prostatectomy (ERP). AIM: To evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozikowski, Mieszko, Zagożdżon, Bartłomiej, Gola, Magdalena, Dobruch, Jakub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118993
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.83869
_version_ 1783420149525643264
author Kozikowski, Mieszko
Zagożdżon, Bartłomiej
Gola, Magdalena
Dobruch, Jakub
author_facet Kozikowski, Mieszko
Zagożdżon, Bartłomiej
Gola, Magdalena
Dobruch, Jakub
author_sort Kozikowski, Mieszko
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was mainly developed for the purposes of prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, its widespread use suggests that it may play a role in a preoperative workup prior to endoscopic radical prostatectomy (ERP). AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of PI-RADS in predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) and its influence on surgical planning of ERP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis involved data of 154 consecutive prostate cancer patients, in whom multiparametric 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was performed before ERP. Standard descriptive assessment of mpMRI images was compared with the PI-RADS system with respect to prostate cancer staging and subsequent potential surgical template adjustment. RESULTS: PI-RADS significantly outperformed the standard way of mpMRI reporting in staging (AUC = 0.615 vs. 0.552, p = 0.036) with PI-RADS 5 established as the best threshold. After reevaluation of imaging, the initial surgical plan was modified based on mpMRI in terms of feasibility and extent of neurovascular bundle preservation during ERP on 96 (31.2%) sides, while on the remaining 212 (68.8%) sides the templates were left unchanged. Decisions based on mpMRI were not associated with increased risk of a positive surgical margin (PSM). CONCLUSIONS: The PI-RADS outperforms the standard staging method using mpMRI and may assist the decision-making process regarding the extent of resection during ERP without increasing the risk of PSM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6528114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65281142019-05-22 Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy Kozikowski, Mieszko Zagożdżon, Bartłomiej Gola, Magdalena Dobruch, Jakub Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was mainly developed for the purposes of prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, its widespread use suggests that it may play a role in a preoperative workup prior to endoscopic radical prostatectomy (ERP). AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of PI-RADS in predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) and its influence on surgical planning of ERP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis involved data of 154 consecutive prostate cancer patients, in whom multiparametric 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was performed before ERP. Standard descriptive assessment of mpMRI images was compared with the PI-RADS system with respect to prostate cancer staging and subsequent potential surgical template adjustment. RESULTS: PI-RADS significantly outperformed the standard way of mpMRI reporting in staging (AUC = 0.615 vs. 0.552, p = 0.036) with PI-RADS 5 established as the best threshold. After reevaluation of imaging, the initial surgical plan was modified based on mpMRI in terms of feasibility and extent of neurovascular bundle preservation during ERP on 96 (31.2%) sides, while on the remaining 212 (68.8%) sides the templates were left unchanged. Decisions based on mpMRI were not associated with increased risk of a positive surgical margin (PSM). CONCLUSIONS: The PI-RADS outperforms the standard staging method using mpMRI and may assist the decision-making process regarding the extent of resection during ERP without increasing the risk of PSM. Termedia Publishing House 2019-03-26 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6528114/ /pubmed/31118993 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.83869 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Fundacja Videochirurgii http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kozikowski, Mieszko
Zagożdżon, Bartłomiej
Gola, Magdalena
Dobruch, Jakub
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
title Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
title_full Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
title_short Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
title_sort prostate imaging reporting and data system in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118993
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.83869
work_keys_str_mv AT kozikowskimieszko prostateimagingreportinganddatasysteminprostatecancerstagingandplanningforradicalprostatectomy
AT zagozdzonbartłomiej prostateimagingreportinganddatasysteminprostatecancerstagingandplanningforradicalprostatectomy
AT golamagdalena prostateimagingreportinganddatasysteminprostatecancerstagingandplanningforradicalprostatectomy
AT dobruchjakub prostateimagingreportinganddatasysteminprostatecancerstagingandplanningforradicalprostatectomy