Cargando…
Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots
BACKGROUND: Plant roots are complex, three-dimensional structures that play a central role in anchorage, water and nutrient acquisition, storage and interaction with rhizosphere microbes. Studying the development of the plant root system architecture is inherently difficult as soil is not a transpar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0438-4 |
_version_ | 1783420165081268224 |
---|---|
author | Corona-Lopez, Diego D. J. Sommer, Sarah Rolfe, Stephen A. Podd, Frank Grieve, Bruce D. |
author_facet | Corona-Lopez, Diego D. J. Sommer, Sarah Rolfe, Stephen A. Podd, Frank Grieve, Bruce D. |
author_sort | Corona-Lopez, Diego D. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Plant roots are complex, three-dimensional structures that play a central role in anchorage, water and nutrient acquisition, storage and interaction with rhizosphere microbes. Studying the development of the plant root system architecture is inherently difficult as soil is not a transparent medium. RESULTS: This study uses electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to visualise oilseed rape root development in horticultural compost. The development of healthy, control plants and those infected with the gall-forming pathogen, Plasmodiophora brassicae—the causative agent of clubroot disease—were compared. EIT measurements were used to quantify the development of the root system and distinguish between control and infected plants at the onset of gall formation, approximately 20 days after inoculation. Although clear and stark differences between healthy and infected plants were obtained by careful (and hence laborious) packing of the growth medium in layers within the pots; clubroot identification is still possible without a laborious vessel filling protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the utility of EIT as a low-cost, non-invasive, non-destructive method for characterising root system architecture and plant-pathogen interactions in opaque growth media. As such it offers advantages over other root characterisation techniques and has the potential to act as a low-cost tool for plant phenotyping. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-019-0438-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6528207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65282072019-05-28 Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots Corona-Lopez, Diego D. J. Sommer, Sarah Rolfe, Stephen A. Podd, Frank Grieve, Bruce D. Plant Methods Research BACKGROUND: Plant roots are complex, three-dimensional structures that play a central role in anchorage, water and nutrient acquisition, storage and interaction with rhizosphere microbes. Studying the development of the plant root system architecture is inherently difficult as soil is not a transparent medium. RESULTS: This study uses electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to visualise oilseed rape root development in horticultural compost. The development of healthy, control plants and those infected with the gall-forming pathogen, Plasmodiophora brassicae—the causative agent of clubroot disease—were compared. EIT measurements were used to quantify the development of the root system and distinguish between control and infected plants at the onset of gall formation, approximately 20 days after inoculation. Although clear and stark differences between healthy and infected plants were obtained by careful (and hence laborious) packing of the growth medium in layers within the pots; clubroot identification is still possible without a laborious vessel filling protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the utility of EIT as a low-cost, non-invasive, non-destructive method for characterising root system architecture and plant-pathogen interactions in opaque growth media. As such it offers advantages over other root characterisation techniques and has the potential to act as a low-cost tool for plant phenotyping. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-019-0438-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6528207/ /pubmed/31139239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0438-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Corona-Lopez, Diego D. J. Sommer, Sarah Rolfe, Stephen A. Podd, Frank Grieve, Bruce D. Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots |
title | Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots |
title_full | Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots |
title_fullStr | Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots |
title_short | Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots |
title_sort | electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0438-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coronalopezdiegodj electricalimpedancetomographyasatoolforphenotypingplantroots AT sommersarah electricalimpedancetomographyasatoolforphenotypingplantroots AT rolfestephena electricalimpedancetomographyasatoolforphenotypingplantroots AT poddfrank electricalimpedancetomographyasatoolforphenotypingplantroots AT grievebruced electricalimpedancetomographyasatoolforphenotypingplantroots |