Cargando…

Bayesian optimization for conformer generation

Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Lucian, Hutchison, Geoffrey R., Morris, Garrett M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7
_version_ 1783420196734631936
author Chan, Lucian
Hutchison, Geoffrey R.
Morris, Garrett M.
author_facet Chan, Lucian
Hutchison, Geoffrey R.
Morris, Garrett M.
author_sort Chan, Lucian
collection PubMed
description Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method called the Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation, and torsion fingerprint deviation are used to quantify the performance of the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates [Formula: see text]  (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires [Formula: see text] energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite using evaluating fewer conformers, 20–40% of the time BOA finds lower-energy conformations than a systematic Confab search for molecules with four or more rotatable bonds. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6528340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65283402019-05-28 Bayesian optimization for conformer generation Chan, Lucian Hutchison, Geoffrey R. Morris, Garrett M. J Cheminform Research Article Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method called the Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation, and torsion fingerprint deviation are used to quantify the performance of the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates [Formula: see text]  (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires [Formula: see text] energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite using evaluating fewer conformers, 20–40% of the time BOA finds lower-energy conformations than a systematic Confab search for molecules with four or more rotatable bonds. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6528340/ /pubmed/31115707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chan, Lucian
Hutchison, Geoffrey R.
Morris, Garrett M.
Bayesian optimization for conformer generation
title Bayesian optimization for conformer generation
title_full Bayesian optimization for conformer generation
title_fullStr Bayesian optimization for conformer generation
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian optimization for conformer generation
title_short Bayesian optimization for conformer generation
title_sort bayesian optimization for conformer generation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chanlucian bayesianoptimizationforconformergeneration
AT hutchisongeoffreyr bayesianoptimizationforconformergeneration
AT morrisgarrettm bayesianoptimizationforconformergeneration