Cargando…
Bayesian optimization for conformer generation
Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7 |
_version_ | 1783420196734631936 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Lucian Hutchison, Geoffrey R. Morris, Garrett M. |
author_facet | Chan, Lucian Hutchison, Geoffrey R. Morris, Garrett M. |
author_sort | Chan, Lucian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method called the Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation, and torsion fingerprint deviation are used to quantify the performance of the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates [Formula: see text] (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires [Formula: see text] energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite using evaluating fewer conformers, 20–40% of the time BOA finds lower-energy conformations than a systematic Confab search for molecules with four or more rotatable bonds. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6528340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65283402019-05-28 Bayesian optimization for conformer generation Chan, Lucian Hutchison, Geoffrey R. Morris, Garrett M. J Cheminform Research Article Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method called the Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation, and torsion fingerprint deviation are used to quantify the performance of the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates [Formula: see text] (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires [Formula: see text] energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite using evaluating fewer conformers, 20–40% of the time BOA finds lower-energy conformations than a systematic Confab search for molecules with four or more rotatable bonds. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6528340/ /pubmed/31115707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chan, Lucian Hutchison, Geoffrey R. Morris, Garrett M. Bayesian optimization for conformer generation |
title | Bayesian optimization for conformer generation |
title_full | Bayesian optimization for conformer generation |
title_fullStr | Bayesian optimization for conformer generation |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayesian optimization for conformer generation |
title_short | Bayesian optimization for conformer generation |
title_sort | bayesian optimization for conformer generation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0354-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanlucian bayesianoptimizationforconformergeneration AT hutchisongeoffreyr bayesianoptimizationforconformergeneration AT morrisgarrettm bayesianoptimizationforconformergeneration |