Cargando…
Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)
AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify and compare the gut microbial community of wild and captive Tor tambroides through 16S rDNA metagenetic sequencing followed by functions prediction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The library of 16S rDNA V3‐V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.734 |
_version_ | 1783420252504195072 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Chun K. Natrah, Ikhsan Suyub, Iswan B. Edward, Marilyn J. Kaman, Nazrien Samsudin, Anjas A. |
author_facet | Tan, Chun K. Natrah, Ikhsan Suyub, Iswan B. Edward, Marilyn J. Kaman, Nazrien Samsudin, Anjas A. |
author_sort | Tan, Chun K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify and compare the gut microbial community of wild and captive Tor tambroides through 16S rDNA metagenetic sequencing followed by functions prediction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The library of 16S rDNA V3‐V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. The sequencing data were analyzed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). The most abundant bacterial phyla in both wild and captive T. tambroides were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Cetobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcaceae family, Bacteroides spp., Phosphate solubilizing bacteria PSB‐M‐3, and Vibrio spp. were five most abundant OTU in wild T. tambroides as compared to Cetobacterium spp., Citrobacter spp., Aeromonadaceae family, Peptostreptococcaceae family and Turicibacter spp. in captive T. tambroides. CONCLUSION: In this study, the specimens of the wild T. tambroides contain more diverse gut microbiota than of the captive ones. The results suggested that Cetobacterium spp. is one of the core microbiota in guts of T. tambroides. Besides, high abundant Bacteroides spp., Citrobacter spp., Turicibacter spp., and Bacillus spp. may provide important functions in T. tambroides guts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this study provide significant information of T. tambroides gut microbiota for further understanding of their physiological functions including growth and disease resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6528585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65285852019-05-28 Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) Tan, Chun K. Natrah, Ikhsan Suyub, Iswan B. Edward, Marilyn J. Kaman, Nazrien Samsudin, Anjas A. Microbiologyopen Original Articles AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify and compare the gut microbial community of wild and captive Tor tambroides through 16S rDNA metagenetic sequencing followed by functions prediction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The library of 16S rDNA V3‐V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. The sequencing data were analyzed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). The most abundant bacterial phyla in both wild and captive T. tambroides were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Cetobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcaceae family, Bacteroides spp., Phosphate solubilizing bacteria PSB‐M‐3, and Vibrio spp. were five most abundant OTU in wild T. tambroides as compared to Cetobacterium spp., Citrobacter spp., Aeromonadaceae family, Peptostreptococcaceae family and Turicibacter spp. in captive T. tambroides. CONCLUSION: In this study, the specimens of the wild T. tambroides contain more diverse gut microbiota than of the captive ones. The results suggested that Cetobacterium spp. is one of the core microbiota in guts of T. tambroides. Besides, high abundant Bacteroides spp., Citrobacter spp., Turicibacter spp., and Bacillus spp. may provide important functions in T. tambroides guts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this study provide significant information of T. tambroides gut microbiota for further understanding of their physiological functions including growth and disease resistance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6528585/ /pubmed/30353678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.734 Text en © 2018 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tan, Chun K. Natrah, Ikhsan Suyub, Iswan B. Edward, Marilyn J. Kaman, Nazrien Samsudin, Anjas A. Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) |
title | Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) |
title_full | Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) |
title_short | Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) |
title_sort | comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive malaysian mahseer (tor tambroides) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanchunk comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides AT natrahikhsan comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides AT suyubiswanb comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides AT edwardmarilynj comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides AT kamannazrien comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides AT samsudinanjasa comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides |