Cargando…

Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)

AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify and compare the gut microbial community of wild and captive Tor tambroides through 16S rDNA metagenetic sequencing followed by functions prediction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The library of 16S rDNA V3‐V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Chun K., Natrah, Ikhsan, Suyub, Iswan B., Edward, Marilyn J., Kaman, Nazrien, Samsudin, Anjas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.734
_version_ 1783420252504195072
author Tan, Chun K.
Natrah, Ikhsan
Suyub, Iswan B.
Edward, Marilyn J.
Kaman, Nazrien
Samsudin, Anjas A.
author_facet Tan, Chun K.
Natrah, Ikhsan
Suyub, Iswan B.
Edward, Marilyn J.
Kaman, Nazrien
Samsudin, Anjas A.
author_sort Tan, Chun K.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify and compare the gut microbial community of wild and captive Tor tambroides through 16S rDNA metagenetic sequencing followed by functions prediction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The library of 16S rDNA V3‐V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. The sequencing data were analyzed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). The most abundant bacterial phyla in both wild and captive T. tambroides were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Cetobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcaceae family, Bacteroides spp., Phosphate solubilizing bacteria PSB‐M‐3, and Vibrio spp. were five most abundant OTU in wild T. tambroides as compared to Cetobacterium spp., Citrobacter spp., Aeromonadaceae family, Peptostreptococcaceae family and Turicibacter spp. in captive T. tambroides. CONCLUSION: In this study, the specimens of the wild T. tambroides contain more diverse gut microbiota than of the captive ones. The results suggested that Cetobacterium spp. is one of the core microbiota in guts of T. tambroides. Besides, high abundant Bacteroides spp., Citrobacter spp., Turicibacter spp., and Bacillus spp. may provide important functions in T. tambroides guts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this study provide significant information of T. tambroides gut microbiota for further understanding of their physiological functions including growth and disease resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6528585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65285852019-05-28 Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides) Tan, Chun K. Natrah, Ikhsan Suyub, Iswan B. Edward, Marilyn J. Kaman, Nazrien Samsudin, Anjas A. Microbiologyopen Original Articles AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify and compare the gut microbial community of wild and captive Tor tambroides through 16S rDNA metagenetic sequencing followed by functions prediction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The library of 16S rDNA V3‐V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. The sequencing data were analyzed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). The most abundant bacterial phyla in both wild and captive T. tambroides were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Cetobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcaceae family, Bacteroides spp., Phosphate solubilizing bacteria PSB‐M‐3, and Vibrio spp. were five most abundant OTU in wild T. tambroides as compared to Cetobacterium spp., Citrobacter spp., Aeromonadaceae family, Peptostreptococcaceae family and Turicibacter spp. in captive T. tambroides. CONCLUSION: In this study, the specimens of the wild T. tambroides contain more diverse gut microbiota than of the captive ones. The results suggested that Cetobacterium spp. is one of the core microbiota in guts of T. tambroides. Besides, high abundant Bacteroides spp., Citrobacter spp., Turicibacter spp., and Bacillus spp. may provide important functions in T. tambroides guts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this study provide significant information of T. tambroides gut microbiota for further understanding of their physiological functions including growth and disease resistance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6528585/ /pubmed/30353678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.734 Text en © 2018 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tan, Chun K.
Natrah, Ikhsan
Suyub, Iswan B.
Edward, Marilyn J.
Kaman, Nazrien
Samsudin, Anjas A.
Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)
title Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)
title_full Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)
title_fullStr Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)
title_short Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides)
title_sort comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive malaysian mahseer (tor tambroides)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.734
work_keys_str_mv AT tanchunk comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides
AT natrahikhsan comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides
AT suyubiswanb comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides
AT edwardmarilynj comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides
AT kamannazrien comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides
AT samsudinanjasa comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivemalaysianmahseertortambroides