Cargando…

Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India

PURPOSE: Biomarker—estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) —discordance plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Rates of discordance have been previously reported around 12%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gogia, Ajay, Deo, S. V. Suryanarayana, Sharma, Dayanand, Phulia, Rakesh K., Thulkar, Sanjay, Malik, Prabhat S., Mathur, Sandeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30951390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00184
_version_ 1783420290443771904
author Gogia, Ajay
Deo, S. V. Suryanarayana
Sharma, Dayanand
Phulia, Rakesh K.
Thulkar, Sanjay
Malik, Prabhat S.
Mathur, Sandeep
author_facet Gogia, Ajay
Deo, S. V. Suryanarayana
Sharma, Dayanand
Phulia, Rakesh K.
Thulkar, Sanjay
Malik, Prabhat S.
Mathur, Sandeep
author_sort Gogia, Ajay
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Biomarker—estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) —discordance plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Rates of discordance have been previously reported around 12% to 35%, 30% to 50%, and 5% to 15%, respectively, in Western literature. Data are sparse regarding the same from developing countries, such as India. METHODS: We performed an ambispective review of paired biomarker status in patients with breast cancer—stage I, II, and III as per American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition—who developed metastasis at recurrence (N = 103 patients). Biomarker status and clinical and radiologic parameters were documented at baseline and subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: Discordance was present in 21.3% for ER, 29.1% for PR, and 15.5% for HER2/neu receptor. In our cohort, 7.8% had positive to negative ER and 13.6% negative to positive. Whereas 21.4% had positive to negative PR, 7.8% had negative to positive PR. Approximately 6.8% had positive to negative HER2/neu receptor and 8.7% negative to positive. In our cohort, 41 patients (40%) had single-site metastasis—bone, 15.5%; lung, 11.7%; nonregional lymph node, 7.8%; liver, 3.9%; and brain, 0.97%. More than one site of metastasis was present in 62 patients (60%). The most common sites of metastasis were visceral—lung and liver—followed by bone, nonregional lymph node, skin, and brain. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that metastatic disease evolution in breast cancer is characterized by change in the tumor biology, which leads to discordance in receptor status. Repeat biomarker studies at metastatic recurrence is warranted, especially if treatment plans include hormone and targeted therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6528736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65287362019-05-22 Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India Gogia, Ajay Deo, S. V. Suryanarayana Sharma, Dayanand Phulia, Rakesh K. Thulkar, Sanjay Malik, Prabhat S. Mathur, Sandeep J Glob Oncol Original Report PURPOSE: Biomarker—estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) —discordance plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Rates of discordance have been previously reported around 12% to 35%, 30% to 50%, and 5% to 15%, respectively, in Western literature. Data are sparse regarding the same from developing countries, such as India. METHODS: We performed an ambispective review of paired biomarker status in patients with breast cancer—stage I, II, and III as per American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition—who developed metastasis at recurrence (N = 103 patients). Biomarker status and clinical and radiologic parameters were documented at baseline and subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: Discordance was present in 21.3% for ER, 29.1% for PR, and 15.5% for HER2/neu receptor. In our cohort, 7.8% had positive to negative ER and 13.6% negative to positive. Whereas 21.4% had positive to negative PR, 7.8% had negative to positive PR. Approximately 6.8% had positive to negative HER2/neu receptor and 8.7% negative to positive. In our cohort, 41 patients (40%) had single-site metastasis—bone, 15.5%; lung, 11.7%; nonregional lymph node, 7.8%; liver, 3.9%; and brain, 0.97%. More than one site of metastasis was present in 62 patients (60%). The most common sites of metastasis were visceral—lung and liver—followed by bone, nonregional lymph node, skin, and brain. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that metastatic disease evolution in breast cancer is characterized by change in the tumor biology, which leads to discordance in receptor status. Repeat biomarker studies at metastatic recurrence is warranted, especially if treatment plans include hormone and targeted therapy. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6528736/ /pubmed/30951390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00184 Text en © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Report
Gogia, Ajay
Deo, S. V. Suryanarayana
Sharma, Dayanand
Phulia, Rakesh K.
Thulkar, Sanjay
Malik, Prabhat S.
Mathur, Sandeep
Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_full Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_fullStr Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_full_unstemmed Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_short Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_sort discordance in biomarker expression in breast cancer after metastasis: single center experience in india
topic Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30951390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00184
work_keys_str_mv AT gogiaajay discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT deosvsuryanarayana discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT sharmadayanand discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT phuliarakeshk discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT thulkarsanjay discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT malikprabhats discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT mathursandeep discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia