Cargando…

Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction

OBJECTIVE: Prediction errors are increased among patients presenting for cataract surgery post laser vision correction (LVC) as biometric relationships are altered. We investigated the prediction errors of five formulae among these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intended refractive error was ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chean, Chung Shen, Aw Yong, Boon Kang, Comely, Samuel, Maleedy, Deena, Kaye, Stephen, Batterbury, Mark, Romano, Vito, Arbabi, Esmaeil, Hu, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000242
_version_ 1783420297853009920
author Chean, Chung Shen
Aw Yong, Boon Kang
Comely, Samuel
Maleedy, Deena
Kaye, Stephen
Batterbury, Mark
Romano, Vito
Arbabi, Esmaeil
Hu, Victor
author_facet Chean, Chung Shen
Aw Yong, Boon Kang
Comely, Samuel
Maleedy, Deena
Kaye, Stephen
Batterbury, Mark
Romano, Vito
Arbabi, Esmaeil
Hu, Victor
author_sort Chean, Chung Shen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Prediction errors are increased among patients presenting for cataract surgery post laser vision correction (LVC) as biometric relationships are altered. We investigated the prediction errors of five formulae among these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intended refractive error was calculated as a sphero-cylinder and as a spherical equivalent for analysis. For determining the difference between the intended and postoperative refractive error, data were transformed into components of Long's formalism, before changing into sphero-cylinder notation. These differences in refractive errors were compared between the five formulae and to that of a control group using a Kruskal-Wallis test. An F-test was used to compare the variances of the difference distributions. RESULTS: 22 eyes post LVC and 19 control eyes were included for analysis. Comparing both groups, there were significant differences in the postoperative refractive error (p=0.038). The differences between the intended and postoperative refractive error were greater in post LVC eyes than control eyes (p=0.012), irrespective of the calculation method for the intended refractive error (p<0.01). The mean difference between the intended and postoperative refractive error was relatively small, but its variance was significantly greater among post LVC eyes than control eyes (p<0.01). Among post LVC eyes, there were no significant differences between the mean intended target refraction and between the intended and postoperative refractive error using five biometry formulae (p=0.76). CONCLUSION: Biometry calculations were less precise for patients who had LVC than patients without LVC. No particular biometry formula appears to be superior among patients post LVC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6528761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65287612019-06-07 Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction Chean, Chung Shen Aw Yong, Boon Kang Comely, Samuel Maleedy, Deena Kaye, Stephen Batterbury, Mark Romano, Vito Arbabi, Esmaeil Hu, Victor BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Prediction errors are increased among patients presenting for cataract surgery post laser vision correction (LVC) as biometric relationships are altered. We investigated the prediction errors of five formulae among these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intended refractive error was calculated as a sphero-cylinder and as a spherical equivalent for analysis. For determining the difference between the intended and postoperative refractive error, data were transformed into components of Long's formalism, before changing into sphero-cylinder notation. These differences in refractive errors were compared between the five formulae and to that of a control group using a Kruskal-Wallis test. An F-test was used to compare the variances of the difference distributions. RESULTS: 22 eyes post LVC and 19 control eyes were included for analysis. Comparing both groups, there were significant differences in the postoperative refractive error (p=0.038). The differences between the intended and postoperative refractive error were greater in post LVC eyes than control eyes (p=0.012), irrespective of the calculation method for the intended refractive error (p<0.01). The mean difference between the intended and postoperative refractive error was relatively small, but its variance was significantly greater among post LVC eyes than control eyes (p<0.01). Among post LVC eyes, there were no significant differences between the mean intended target refraction and between the intended and postoperative refractive error using five biometry formulae (p=0.76). CONCLUSION: Biometry calculations were less precise for patients who had LVC than patients without LVC. No particular biometry formula appears to be superior among patients post LVC. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6528761/ /pubmed/31179392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000242 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chean, Chung Shen
Aw Yong, Boon Kang
Comely, Samuel
Maleedy, Deena
Kaye, Stephen
Batterbury, Mark
Romano, Vito
Arbabi, Esmaeil
Hu, Victor
Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction
title Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction
title_full Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction
title_fullStr Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction
title_full_unstemmed Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction
title_short Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction
title_sort refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000242
work_keys_str_mv AT cheanchungshen refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT awyongboonkang refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT comelysamuel refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT maleedydeena refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT kayestephen refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT batterburymark refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT romanovito refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT arbabiesmaeil refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection
AT huvictor refractiveoutcomesfollowingcataractsurgeryinpatientswhohavehadmyopiclaservisioncorrection