Cargando…
Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is a standard treatment for stage T1a esophageal cancer, with esophagectomy or radical radiation therapy (RT) performed for stage T1b lesions. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes of each modality for clinical stage T1 esophageal cancer. METHODS: In to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30600672 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18254 |
_version_ | 1783420344475844608 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Andrew J. Choi, Seo Hee Byun, Hwa Kyung Kim, Hyun Ju Choi, Jinhyun Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Sang Kil Park, Kyung Ran Lee, Chang Geol |
author_facet | Yang, Andrew J. Choi, Seo Hee Byun, Hwa Kyung Kim, Hyun Ju Choi, Jinhyun Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Sang Kil Park, Kyung Ran Lee, Chang Geol |
author_sort | Yang, Andrew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is a standard treatment for stage T1a esophageal cancer, with esophagectomy or radical radiation therapy (RT) performed for stage T1b lesions. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes of each modality for clinical stage T1 esophageal cancer. METHODS: In total, 179 patients with clinical T1N0M0-stage esophageal cancer treated from 2006 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixty-two patients with clinical T1a-stage cancer underwent endoscopic resection. Among 117 patients with clinical T1b-stage cancer, 82 underwent esophagectomy, and 35 received chemoradiotherapy or RT. We compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for each treatment modality. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 1 to 120 months). The 5-year OS and RFS rates for patients with stage T1a cancer receiving endoscopic resection were 100% and 85%, respectively. For patients with stage T1b, the 5-year OS and RFS rates were 78% and 77%, respectively, for the esophagectomy group; 80% and 44%, respectively, for the RT alone group; and 96% and 80%, respectively, for the chemoradiation group. The esophagectomy group showed significantly higher RFS than the RT alone group (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in RFS between the esophagectomy and chemoradiation groups (p=0.922). Grade 4 or higher treatment-related complications occurred in four patients who underwent esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection appeared to be an adequate treatment for patients with T1a-stage esophageal cancer. The multidisciplinary approach involving chemoradiation was comparable to esophagectomy in terms of survival outcome without serious complications for T1b-stage esophageal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6529170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65291702019-05-30 Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer Yang, Andrew J. Choi, Seo Hee Byun, Hwa Kyung Kim, Hyun Ju Choi, Jinhyun Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Sang Kil Park, Kyung Ran Lee, Chang Geol Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is a standard treatment for stage T1a esophageal cancer, with esophagectomy or radical radiation therapy (RT) performed for stage T1b lesions. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes of each modality for clinical stage T1 esophageal cancer. METHODS: In total, 179 patients with clinical T1N0M0-stage esophageal cancer treated from 2006 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixty-two patients with clinical T1a-stage cancer underwent endoscopic resection. Among 117 patients with clinical T1b-stage cancer, 82 underwent esophagectomy, and 35 received chemoradiotherapy or RT. We compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for each treatment modality. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 1 to 120 months). The 5-year OS and RFS rates for patients with stage T1a cancer receiving endoscopic resection were 100% and 85%, respectively. For patients with stage T1b, the 5-year OS and RFS rates were 78% and 77%, respectively, for the esophagectomy group; 80% and 44%, respectively, for the RT alone group; and 96% and 80%, respectively, for the chemoradiation group. The esophagectomy group showed significantly higher RFS than the RT alone group (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in RFS between the esophagectomy and chemoradiation groups (p=0.922). Grade 4 or higher treatment-related complications occurred in four patients who underwent esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection appeared to be an adequate treatment for patients with T1a-stage esophageal cancer. The multidisciplinary approach involving chemoradiation was comparable to esophagectomy in terms of survival outcome without serious complications for T1b-stage esophageal cancer. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2019-05 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6529170/ /pubmed/30600672 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18254 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Andrew J. Choi, Seo Hee Byun, Hwa Kyung Kim, Hyun Ju Choi, Jinhyun Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Sang Kil Park, Kyung Ran Lee, Chang Geol Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer |
title | Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer |
title_full | Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer |
title_short | Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer |
title_sort | management of clinical t1n0m0 esophageal cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6529170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30600672 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangandrewj managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT choiseohee managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT byunhwakyung managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT kimhyunju managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT choijinhyun managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT leeyongchan managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT leesangkil managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT parkkyungran managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer AT leechanggeol managementofclinicalt1n0m0esophagealcancer |